Bledisloe II - Have a stab at the teams.

phoenetia

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-time="1472426592" data-cid="610344" data-author="taniwharugby">I see a clip about of Phipps chucking Fekitoa's boot away is doing the rounds! :mocking: Thought was funny! :good1:</blockquote>Saw that this morning - kinda funny in a "petulant little man child" way. The message from Cheika was probably "Rip their fking heads off and throw em to the stands". I doubt theres any accolades for boots. <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-time="1472427352" data-cid="610348" data-author="MajorRage">Frank's should have been cited and shld be out for a few weeks. It's as simple as that. The north are going nuts, and rightly.</blockquote>Agree - annoyingly, it not only feeds into that "ABs get preferential treatment" narrative which the North constantly bang on about, it gives it some credibility (more so than spear-gate I'd say). I reckon that clip will get airtime the next time we front up against the English.

phoenetia

dupe post

mariner4life

I fucking hate that chucking the boot away rubbish. It's childish. Typical fucking halfback.
 
Just read the G&G thread, it's delicious. Our very own Nick is balls deep in the oh poor us whinging as well. Have a cry fluffybunnies.

NTA

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="phoenetia" data-cid="610351" data-time="1472427587">
<div>
Agree - annoyingly, it not only feeds into that "ABs get preferential treatment" narrative which the North constantly bang on about, it gives it some credibility (more so than spear-gate I'd say). I reckon that clip will get airtime the next time we front up against the English.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
BOD was retweeting about it with the reverse angle, which is even worse than the first angle. So there's that.
 
 
In any case, the ARU has it at their option to get it reviewed I think? The match review official can either refer an incident on his own, or from either team.
 
Douglas didn't make a big deal out of it at the time, because he looked to care more about getting the ball. Rumour is he didn't want to make a big deal of it after the match either. I have no way of verifying or disproving that rumour. 
 
However, the ARU would be doing a poor job of player welfare if they DIDN'T refer the incident.

taniwharugby

isn't there that time period it must be done within, like when a Frenchmen gouged McCaw in the RWC final, time had passed so no citing...
 
I agree with all above, it looks very bad, and I think it aint gonna go away, these things need to be done by correct process (which by SANZAR rules, it has) rather than trial by social media

antipodean

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MajorRage" data-cid="610348" data-time="1472427352">
<div>
Frank's should have been cited and shld be out for a few weeks. It's as simple as that. 
The north are going nuts, and rightly.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Disagree.
 
At best it's a penalty. I'm always reticent to jump on a twitter/ reddit jerkathon on the basis of a single frame. I don't see why a player should be thrown under the bus to assuage the drooling retards. Is anyone having a cry about this?
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/JWCFQvv.jpg" alt="JWCFQvv.jpg">
 
Poite should have immediately penalised Franks for playing the head of an opponent. Kane Douglas's lack of reaction to that as opposed to his clear annoyance at Franks applying pressure to his neck in the same maul is telling. So is that the Wallabies didn't refer it to the citing commissioner.

NTA

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="610359" data-time="1472429207">
<div>
isn't there that time period it must be done within, like when a Frenchmen gouged McCaw in the RWC final?
 
I agree with all above, it looks very bad, and I think it aint gonna go away
</div>
</blockquote>
 
I think its 48 hours after full time. So expires tonight?
 
 
 
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="610355" data-time="1472428368">
<div>
Our very own Nick is balls deep in the oh poor us whinging as well. Have a cry fluffybunnys. 
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Not as deep as some, but yeah, I'll say things there I won't say here - the reasons why are pretty fucking obvious.

Crazy Horse

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="610362" data-time="1472429395">
<div>
Not as deep as some, but yeah, I'll say things there I won't say here - the reasons why are pretty fucking obvious.
</div>
</blockquote>
Because you would get shot down with irrefutable and reasoned arguments on here?

NTA

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crazy Horse" data-cid="610364" data-time="1472429930">
<div>
Because you would get shot down with irrefutable and reasoned arguments on here?
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Not exactly :)
 
 
 
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="antipodean" data-cid="610360" data-time="1472429234">
<div>
Disagree.
 
At best it's a penalty. I'm always reticent to jump on a twitter/ reddit jerkathon on the basis of a single frame. 
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Agree totally, and if you can give me video about Coleman going at that AB player's face, I'll certainly consider it in the same light as Franks having multiple attempts at Douglas' head. 
 
Because that is the issue with Franks - he goes left arm over the shoulder/neck and Poite warns him (which he doesn't hear because its loud). Its when he releases any firm hold, and just decides the face is the better target, that I have issue with

I agreed with Hansen overall: sometimes in a maul you can't see where your hands are going in the first instance. But this is not an accident. 
 
If the ARU aren't going to stick their oar in the water, and Douglas doesn't want to make a big deal out of it, then OK.

mariner4life

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="610362" data-time="1472429395">
<div>
I think its 48 hours after full time. So expires tonight?
 
 
 
 
Not as deep as some, but yeah, I'll say things there I won't say here - the reasons why are pretty fucking obvious.
</div>
</blockquote>
couple of those blokes have fully gone off the deep end. Beautiful.

NTA

Yeah. My line is like what I've said here: The ref was fucking awful. He gave us a warning after two unrelated incidents late in the game, but didn't warn the ABs for either infringement in their red zone. Didn't change the game, but the inconsistency is shit. Just look at the scrums alone: you know with Poite that if its your ball, you're basically getting a free ride. Then suddenly he's inventing or ignoring other stuff.
 
The lack of action on Douglas is fucked. I think beyond the incident itself, its a bit of bullshit if World Rugby are all "No Neck Rolls at RWC2015!" and then not picking the things they can easily pick as a marker for future things.
 
Imagine what happens if, two weeks from now, some Argie gets his hand in Read's face, and gets sat down for 6 weeks? Fark...
 
The systems we have aren't good enough, ultimately, and I've made that pretty clear on GAGR. In part because it pisses off the school ties when I tell them their systems are fucked ;)

antipodean

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="610366" data-time="1472430253">
<div>
Agree totally, and if you can give me video about Coleman going at that AB player's face, I'll certainly consider it in the same light as Franks having multiple attempts at Douglas' head. 
 
Because that is the issue with Franks - he goes left arm over the shoulder/neck and Poite warns him (which he doesn't hear because its loud). Its when he releases any firm hold, and just decides the face is the better target, that I have issue with
</div>
</blockquote>
 
What I see is Franks going over the shoulder and making incidental contact with the head, then playing the head for which he should have been penalised. Poite saw it, called for him to stop which he did.
 
Let me be clear about this:
<ul><li>He should have been penalised.</li>
<li>I don't think there was a gouge.</li>
<li>If the Wallabies believe there was contact with the area around the eye, let alone a gouge, they should have referred it to the citing commissioner - they didn't.</li>
</ul>

Hooroo

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="610367" data-time="1472430379">
<div>
couple of those blokes have fully gone off the deep end. Beautiful. 
</div>
</blockquote>
Any quoted posts would be greatly appreciated. Save me having to go have a looksy

No Quarter

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MajorRage" data-cid="610348" data-time="1472427352">
<div>
Frank's should have been cited and shld be out for a few weeks. It's as simple as that. 
The north are going nuts, and rightly.
</div>
</blockquote>
I guess they'll neatly overlook the fact that the Wallabies didn't even cite it after the match though. That wouldn't suit their THE ABS ARE THUGS narrative.

antipodean

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="610357" data-time="1472428872">
<div>
BOD was retweeting about it with the reverse angle, which is even worse than the first angle. So there's that.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Of course the fluffybunny was. He must wake up and immediately get on Google and type "nasty All Blacks".
 
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/xFkHMqb.png" alt="xFkHMqb.png">

Tim

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Hooroo" data-cid="610378" data-time="1472431462">
<div>
Any quoted posts would be greatly appreciated. Save me having to go have a looksy
</div>
</blockquote>
 
 
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">NZRU has history with foul players getting away with shit at test level and lauding them for it. Meads, Loe and Bunce. Everyone remembers Michael Brial doing his nut at Bunce but few remember the incident which fuelled Brial's brain snap to try for the square up. Meads supposed hard man rips a bloke's leg off under a ruck and is lauded. Loe is just a dirty scum bag who only ever faced justice for gouging the eyes of his own player yet still gets airtime 
Then we have Paddy Obrien in terms of officials with such clean records of integrity and performance. Lets ask Stu Dickson about Paddy's integrity and Fiji about his "high" performance.
 
</blockquote>

mariner4life

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Hooroo" data-cid="610378" data-time="1472431462">
<div>
Any quoted posts would be greatly appreciated. Save me having to go have a looksy
</div>
</blockquote>
go, it's worth it. A couple keep egging each other on, and they get shriller, it's awesome.

mariner4life

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="NTA" data-cid="610372" data-time="1472430781">
<div>
Yeah. My line is like what I've said here: The ref was fucking awful. He gave us a warning after two unrelated incidents late in the game, but didn't warn the ABs for either infringement in their red zone. Didn't change the game, but the inconsistency is shit. Just look at the scrums alone: you know with Poite that if its your ball, you're basically getting a free ride. Then suddenly he's inventing or ignoring other stuff.
 
The lack of action on Douglas is fucked. I think beyond the incident itself, its a bit of bullshit if World Rugby are all "No Neck Rolls at RWC2015!" and then not picking the things they can easily pick as a marker for future things.
 
Imagine what happens if, two weeks from now, some Argie gets his hand in Read's face, and gets sat down for 6 weeks? Fark...
 
The systems we have aren't good enough, ultimately, and I've made that pretty clear on GAGR. In part because it pisses off the school ties when I tell them their systems are fucked ;)
</div>
</blockquote>
 
A lot of the reffing was mystifying, but please don't fall in to the trap of "we lost, so he was harsher on us" (i know you're not, but your getting dangerously close). There were more than a few things that happened that should have been in our favour, but we tend to ignore because the game was going our way. 
 
I'm not commenting on teh Douglas thing any more, because the officials obviously have more info than any of us, no governing body is going to ignore something that blatant for fear of the publicity. I suspect the twitter-based official appeal is pending anyway. I thought the Coles clean out penalty was soft as all fuck. 
 
It was a messy, niggly, shitty game, with a heap of off (and on) the ball stuff going on all over the park, and far, far too much mouth. And at the risk of upsetting Nick, i believe it was at the instigation of the Wallabies, and I'm disappointed in us for getting involved at all.

NTA

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="mariner4life" data-cid="610388" data-time="1472432220">
<div>
A lot of the reffing was mystifying, but please don't fall in to the trap of "we lost, so he was harsher on us" (i know you're not, but your getting dangerously close)
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Only because I see the things that went against us. And I'm not likely to replay the game at any point so fuck the ABs ;)
 
Agree about the Coles thing. It wasn't a "forearm", just a shitty cleanout that looked even worse on replay. Fardy was on the deck, and right next to an AB player, so what the fuck else was meant to happen? Coles not try to secure the ball?
 
But the ruck was messy as fuck all game, and particularly the number of "planes landing" from both sides. Poite let that happen because, judging by what I've seen of the T14, that's how the game is done in France.

No Quarter

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="610344" data-time="1472426592">
<div>
I see a clip about of Phipps chucking Fekitoa's boot away is doing the rounds! :mocking:
 
Thought was funny! :good1:
</div>
</blockquote>
 
<img src="https://memecrunch.com/meme/67N3T/austin-powers-who-throws-a-shoe-honestly/image.png?w=500&c=1" alt="image.png?w=500&c=1">

The Silver Fern

Bledisloe II - Have a stab at the teams.