• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Chiefs vs Wales, June 14

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefswales
218 Posts 54 Posters 22.9k Views
Chiefs vs Wales, June 14
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DonsteppaD Online
    DonsteppaD Online
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    AWARD THAT ONE!!! <br><br>
    Dominic Bird running like Nonu Nonu Nonu out wide.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    wrote on last edited by
    #82

    <p>hahahhaha Dominic Bird sidesteps through Welsh defence like a giraffe and scores on the outside</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #83

    <p>Seriously?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>There's no clear and obvious grounding - but, there's no clear and obvious held up either.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Donald's should be a try every day of the week.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    <p>21-0 Chiefs</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    <p>Donald with the sideline conversion, so it's 21-0, 1minute to go</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #86

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Chris B." data-cid="587830" data-time="1465889012">
    <div>
    <p>Seriously?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>There's no clear and obvious grounding - but, <strong>there's no clear and obvious held up either</strong>.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Donald's should be a try every day of the week.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>That's only relevant if the ref had asked whether "there is a reason not to award the try". But that's not what the ref asked.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    <p>good Chiefs defensive holds some unimaginative Welsh attacking out, so it's 21-0 HT. Woohoo</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #88

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="587834" data-time="1465889191">
    <div>
    <p>That's only relevant if the ref had asked whether "there is a reason not to award the try". But that's not what the ref asked.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Try or no try?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>TRY!!!</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Online
    DonsteppaD Online
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="587834" data-time="1465889191"><p>That's only relevant if the ref had asked whether "there is a reason not to award the try". But that's not what the ref asked.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Ref asked the soft cautious question.... Still, happy with 21 - 0 at halftime

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #90

    Bloody hell Wales sort your shit out.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DonsteppaD Online
    DonsteppaD Online
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #91

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="587838" data-time="1465889333"><p>Bloody hell Wales sort your shit out.</p></blockquote>
    <br>
    Eh? Why? This is spot on so far......

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #92

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Donsteppa" data-cid="587839" data-time="1465889372"><p>Eh? Why? This is spot on so far......</p></blockquote>
    Admittedly I only just tuned in as I thought it was a 7.30 start so have no idea how the game is going, but I have Welsh grandparents so like to see them do well. 21-0 is not doing well!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #93

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Donsteppa" data-cid="587837" data-time="1465889281">
    <div>
    <p>Ref asked the soft cautious question.... Still, happy with 21 - 0 at halftime</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>In my mind, better than nine times out ten Donald's got that ball on the ground. It's far more likely that he has than he hasn't - why is the burden of proof on the try-scorer?</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • pooler fanP Offline
    pooler fanP Offline
    pooler fan
    wrote on last edited by
    #94

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="587842" data-time="1465889584"><p>Admittedly I only just tuned in as I thought it was a 7.30 start so have no idea how the game is going, but I have Welsh grandparents so like to see them do well. 21-0 is not doing well!</p></blockquote>
    Don't let gats know you're qualified, fancy a game Saturday ? 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #95

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Chris B." data-cid="587836" data-time="1465889270">
    <div>
    <p>Try or no try?</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>TRY!!!</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>No, no clear and obvious grounding (answer TMO).</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    <p>Brad Weber looking like he's almost having an adrenaline overdose! Hilarious.  :lol:</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #97

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Stargazer" data-cid="587847" data-time="1465889999">
    <div>
    <p>No, no clear and obvious grounding (answer TMO).</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Yeah - but where was the evidence that it was held up? The only thing lacking was a camera angle - the balance of likelihoods was a try - and very clearly in favour of a try.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Stupid decision in my opinion.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • kiwiinmelbK Online
    kiwiinmelbK Online
    kiwiinmelb
    wrote on last edited by
    #98

    only been watching for 10 minutes , chiefs look extra committed in defence

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TordahT Offline
    TordahT Offline
    Tordah
    wrote on last edited by
    #99

    <p>so weird, Chiefs commit many penalisable offences but nothing, then Elliot legitimiately jumps on a ball that's been left behind and he'S penalised for that. Frasier really is not a good referee</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by
    #100

    <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Chris B." data-cid="587849" data-time="1465890810">
    <div>
    <p>Yeah - but where was <strong>the evidence that it was held up</strong>? The only thing lacking was a camera angle - the balance of likelihoods was a try - and very clearly in favour of a try.</p>
    <p> </p>
    <p>Stupid decision in my opinion.</p>
    </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p> </p>
    <p>They don't need proof that it was held up. It needs to be clear and obvious that there was a grounding. If that isn't clear. there isn't a try. That's just the way it works. Would have preferred another outcome, but if they can't see a grounding, there isn't a try.</p>

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

Chiefs vs Wales, June 14
Rugby Matches
chiefswales
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.