Chiefs v Crusaders
-
@Steven-Harris said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
That’s a Red Card IMO
Might get mitigation for dropping player, but tough to argue, especially with Vaai leading with the point of the shoulder.
-
Barely a bump. Newell milking that.
-
-
-
@Machpants especially with contact already made, had time to drop himself
-
@KiwiMurph said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Shouldn't Newell be off for a HIA?
That’s a must when you moan about it
-
@Machpants said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Jeeze our players don't fucking learn about their tackle height, no excuse for that one
Vaai isn't usually a lazy player either, but that was yuck.
-
@Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@Steven-Harris said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
That’s a Red Card IMO
Might get mitigation for dropping player, but tough to argue, especially with Vaai leading with the point of the shoulder.
there is a technique issue with a few of our NZ tight fwds... they have been pinging these for a few years now ..... I would have thought this would be coached out of our fellas by now ....
-
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Barely a bump. Newell milking that.
Easy for you to say. You might feel differently if that was someone’s shoulder directly into your face at speed.
-
Brilliant from DMac.
-
Super impressed with Preston’s ability to get the ball away from off the ground
-
-
@gt12 yep, if it is.card worthy contact to head, then it is worth checking said head
-
@Steven-Harris said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
Super impressed with Preston’s ability to the the ball away from off the ground
Showed a nice box kick earlier too
-
@taniwharugby said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@gt12 yep, if it is.card worthy contact to head, then it is worth checking said head
You understand why the rule exists, right?
