BOP v Canterbury (SF)
-
@Duluth said in BOP v Canterbury (SF):
Fihaki 2 tackles 3 misses. He has made 3m though
Doing the good work both sides of the ball!
-
For all the talk about Hoskins not being up to speed we are seeing the likes Fihaki who should’nt be anywhere near the ABs being selected
Beggars belief -
Poor hands by Christie. If BOP score next it could be curtains.
-
@Bovidae said in BOP v Canterbury (SF):
Fihaki confirming his AB XV selection.
Razors pet mate. He has been banging the table for him since he was in NZ20’s. Can’t give up on him now or else he will look silly. I just do not see what they see in him but hey, wtf do I know posting this from my couch.
-
And that should secure the result. Great effort to support rewarded with a try. Crusaders defence looking tired now.
-
@antipodean said in BOP v Canterbury (SF):
And that should secure the result. Great effort to support rewarded with a try. Crusaders defence looking tired now.
They were hitting hard when I started watching, but curiously sending in two guys to most narrow channel tackles and lots of wrestling after the tackled player should have been released. Coming back to bite them now.
-
-
@Bones said in BOP v Canterbury (SF):
@Frank said in BOP v Canterbury (SF):
Narawa should be ahead of Fihaki. Way ahead.
And Carter.
It’d be a long list
-
@Duluth said in BOP v Canterbury (SF):
@Bones said in BOP v Canterbury (SF):
@Frank said in BOP v Canterbury (SF):
Narawa should be ahead of Fihaki. Way ahead.
And Carter.
It’d be a long list
🤣
Yeah I was trying to keep it to just this game. -
TJ still manages to kiss Canterbury’s arse even though they’ve been dealt to.
-
-
@antipodean said in BOP v Canterbury (SF):
And that should secure the result. Great effort to support rewarded with a try. Crusaders defence looking tired now.
So is Canterburys
-
@Duluth said in BOP v Canterbury (SF):
TJ constantly getting BOP names wrong. He needs to be retired
Fixed
