• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Springboks vs All Blacks I

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
springboksallblacks
1.6k Posts 85 Posters 50.1k Views
Springboks vs All Blacks I
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to Bones on last edited by Smuts
    #1559

    @Bones nah cuz you’re all good. It’s a whole .6% higher - almost 1 whole take over a hundred put ins.

    Edit - sorry, I was wrong your math is shit.

    It’s 1/14 and 2/26.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Smuts on last edited by pakman
    #1560

    @Smuts said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    @pakman seems we had the same impression of the mauls.

    Read your scrum analysis above. Not sure I completely agree with your scoring but your scrum stood up very well in your 22 and was foxy in protecting possession outside of it. Overall though, giving up just a single penalty, winning all your put ins and making the scrum a mess on bok feeds is a big tactical success.

    Not sure how you can say your lineout was on top. If the Sanzaar stats can be believed you won 13 and lost 1 (stolen at the front?), Boks won 24 and lost 2 (Marx overthrows, iirc.)

    As an aside it’s very interesting seeing how many lineouts the ABs gave the boks. A lot of kicking to touch. Why the shift?

    On scrums, of my four stages Boks only had edge in second, with Eben and Du Toit behind starting front row. ABs had six put ins out of nine.

    On lineouts, ABs were winning their throw more easily and the sole 'miss' was when ball went through jumper's fingers but regathered by Scooter.

    Think we disrupted one of Boks and one was a 'no jump'.

    Seems part of ABs kicking strategy was to kick to touch. Not quite sure why.

    SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #1561

    @pakman definitely was a period early in second half when Bok lineout went to shit so stats were a bit surprising. Agree that we didn’t put as much pressure on your lineout as you did on a few of ours. Then again, you didn’t have that many.

    Understand what you’re saying about scrums I think. Just think you were under a lot more pressure than us most of the time. Like the reverse of LOs.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Smuts on last edited by
    #1562

    @Smuts Frans looked more uncomfortable than I’ve seen for a long time, which surprised me. I also expect that Kitshoff must be close to a Bomb Squad recall.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #1563

    Only three scrums in second half.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    wrote on last edited by
    #1564

    Screenshot 2024-09-04 at 21.22.03.png

    https://archive.ph/EHlvb. from this article.

    Seems they ranked all the refs through the RWC and Brace was dead last.

    MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to Jet on last edited by
    #1565

    @Jet said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    Screenshot 2024-09-04 at 21.22.03.png

    https://archive.ph/EHlvb. from this article.

    Seems they ranked all the refs through the RWC and Brace was dead last.

    (B)race to the bottom

    I’ll get my coat

    SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #1566

    @MiketheSnow we all need to emBrace shit reffing.

    Meet you outside.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jet
    replied to Smuts on last edited by
    #1567

    @Smuts said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    @MiketheSnow we all need to emBrace shit reffing.

    Meet you outside.

    It C’arley get any worse.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by
    #1568

    Sack them all. Should all be on the dole man.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    wrote on last edited by
    #1569

    They would all be better Gardeners.

    SmutsS nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #1570

    @Snowy or undertakers like his mate Nic

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #1571

    @Snowy yep, and living in Barnes!

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #1572

    @Snowy said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    They would all be better Gardeners.
    Wouldn't be able to keep rows or straight lines though...

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • LatsToTheMaxL Offline
    LatsToTheMaxL Offline
    LatsToTheMax
    replied to Jet on last edited by
    #1573

    @Jet said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    @Snowy said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    @Jet said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    Ryan was asked if he was happy with the refs performance.

    "It was a big test for Andrew Brace, Im sure he learned a few things, as did we".

    Slightly less subtle than the usual euphemisms we get.

    Whenever you see a coach (in this case Razor) say "discipline let us down", or mention "ref's interpretations", just read " that fluffybunny with the whistle didn't have a fucking clue".

    Sadly they aren't allowed to say that, so I will.

    One of my biggest bugbears in Rugby these days.

    "Discipline let us down"

    Translation: The refs perceptions/ interpretation of our discipline let us down. Video evidence shows our discipline was actually fine.

    "we have to be cleverer with the pictures we are showing the ref"

    Translation "we have to over exaggerate our clear releases etc, because this gobshite cant be trusted to officiate fairly".

    100%. I said this earlier. Are we getting shafted by the refs? Hell yeah. It's bleedin' f@cking obvious. Some of the RC and YC we cop are beyond ridiculous. But we need to be wiser to this. If we keep doing the same old shit, we'll continue to cop the same shitty calls. Take one step back on defence. Don't attempt to jackle, numbers to the ball and drive over. Tackle lower etc.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to DaGrubster on last edited by
    #1574

    @DaGrubster said in Springboks vs All Blacks I:

    The ball bounces on the ground which indicates clear seperation. He is in the act of scoring a try so yes he is travelling forward.

    No try

    There is also no evidence the ball was grounded on or over the line.

    So even if it wasn’t ruled a knock on because of some law, the fact remains that the ball was on the ground, the Bok player had been tackled and lying on the ground he still played the ball. Rugby is a game played on your feet….

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #1575

    1 Reply Last reply
    1

Springboks vs All Blacks I
Rugby Matches
springboksallblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.