Wallabies v Springboks 1
-
@Frank said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
Not sure there should be an English language learner as a commentator.
Not a fan of SBW?
-
@nostrildamus
That's the joke. -
@mikey07 said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
@nostrildamus I’m only angry as the Aussies are the last part of my big multi payout.
You had the Aussies as part of your multi? Crickey.
-
Aussies need to bring Tate on. Need some zip around the ruck.
-
@Frank said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
@Bones said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
Bongi warming up in the background 🤣
Was this one of those specialist Rassie fake injuries? I didn't see the first half.
It's looking like it. Predictable.
-
Aussies look like an under 10s side where all the kids bunch towards the ball.
-
I’ve only started watching the last 15 mins of the first half ,
Aussies actually have shown a bit of grit in defence, but they have to do something constructive with the ball
-
@KiwiMurph said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
@W32 said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
Should be 50 nil. Boks can’t finish
Also known as Willie Le Roux...
Etzebeth says hold my beer and refuses to pass to Kolbe.
-
@Bones said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
@Frank said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
@Bones said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
Bongi warming up in the background 🤣
Was this one of those specialist Rassie fake injuries? I didn't see the first half.
It's looking like it. Predictable.
Why is Rassie such a fuckin cheat?
-
@Frank said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
@Bones said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
@Frank said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
@Bones said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
Bongi warming up in the background 🤣
Was this one of those specialist Rassie fake injuries? I didn't see the first half.
It's looking like it. Predictable.
Why is Rassie such a fuckin cheat?
Why not I guess? It's only cheating if you're not actually allowed to do it.
-
Can't complain about biased refereeing when you get calls like that in your favour. How did that constitute a mark?
-
@antipodean said in Wallabies v Springboks 1:
Can't complain about biased refereeing when you get calls like that in your favour. How did that constitute a mark?
Caught it, called mark then dropped it I thought?