Hurricanes vs Chiefs
-
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
That's moronic. Why wasn't it already a YC?
Advantage, so the penalty wasn't called.
Why does that matter? YC infringement is YC infringement.
It's not an infringement if it isn't called.
I've never heard that in my life. If a high tackle was made it shouldn't be carded it points are scored then right?
I suspect you're being deliberately obtuse, but I'll answer anyway: Until the penalty is awarded for offside, there's no infringement while advantage is in use, hence no sanction.
So because the try was scored, there's no infringement. That's what you're saying right? Not sure I'm the one being obtuse.
How long have you been watching rugby? Never noticed a team scoring and the commentary saying player X is lucky or otherwise they'd probably be facing a YC? Never seen a ref play advantage until today and decide the appropriate sanction when going back to the original offence?
There's no offence if the ref determines the non-offending team has gained an advantage. There's an entire section in the laws dealing with this.
-
Should have taken 3 Chiefs.
-
Ratima finding things difficult other than his try.
-
Did Cortez even touch that?
-
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
That's moronic. Why wasn't it already a YC?
Advantage, so the penalty wasn't called.
Why does that matter? YC infringement is YC infringement.
It's not an infringement if it isn't called.
I've never heard that in my life. If a high tackle was made it shouldn't be carded it points are scored then right?
I suspect you're being deliberately obtuse, but I'll answer anyway: Until the penalty is awarded for offside, there's no infringement while advantage is in use, hence no sanction.
So because the try was scored, there's no infringement. That's what you're saying right? Not sure I'm the one being obtuse.
How long have you been watching rugby? Never noticed a team scoring and the commentary saying player X is lucky or otherwise they'd probably be facing a YC? Never seen a ref play advantage until today and decide the appropriate sanction when going back to the original offence?
There's no offence if the ref determines the non-offending team has gained an advantage. There's an entire section in the laws dealing with this.
🤣 I've only been watching for 40 minutes Mr expert. So you've never seen anyone yellow carded for a previous infringement when a try has been scored? How long have you been watching rugby?
-
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
So you've never seen anyone yellow carded for a previous infringement when a try has been scored?
Pretty sure I have seen that, a lot.
-
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
That's moronic. Why wasn't it already a YC?
Advantage, so the penalty wasn't called.
Why does that matter? YC infringement is YC infringement.
It's not an infringement if it isn't called.
I've never heard that in my life. If a high tackle was made it shouldn't be carded it points are scored then right?
I suspect you're being deliberately obtuse, but I'll answer anyway: Until the penalty is awarded for offside, there's no infringement while advantage is in use, hence no sanction.
So because the try was scored, there's no infringement. That's what you're saying right? Not sure I'm the one being obtuse.
How long have you been watching rugby? Never noticed a team scoring and the commentary saying player X is lucky or otherwise they'd probably be facing a YC? Never seen a ref play advantage until today and decide the appropriate sanction when going back to the original offence?
There's no offence if the ref determines the non-offending team has gained an advantage. There's an entire section in the laws dealing with this.
🤣 I've only been watching for 40 minutes Mr expert. So you've never seen anyone yellow carded for a previous infringement when a try has been scored? How long have you been watching rugby?
Name an instance when someone has been YC for offside when the non-offending team scores a try.
-
One point game.
-
Better kick from DMac.
-
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@antipodean said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Bones said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
That's moronic. Why wasn't it already a YC?
Advantage, so the penalty wasn't called.
Why does that matter? YC infringement is YC infringement.
It's not an infringement if it isn't called.
I've never heard that in my life. If a high tackle was made it shouldn't be carded it points are scored then right?
I suspect you're being deliberately obtuse, but I'll answer anyway: Until the penalty is awarded for offside, there's no infringement while advantage is in use, hence no sanction.
So because the try was scored, there's no infringement. That's what you're saying right? Not sure I'm the one being obtuse.
How long have you been watching rugby? Never noticed a team scoring and the commentary saying player X is lucky or otherwise they'd probably be facing a YC? Never seen a ref play advantage until today and decide the appropriate sanction when going back to the original offence?
There's no offence if the ref determines the non-offending team has gained an advantage. There's an entire section in the laws dealing with this.
🤣 I've only been watching for 40 minutes Mr expert. So you've never seen anyone yellow carded for a previous infringement when a try has been scored? How long have you been watching rugby?
Name an instance when someone has been YC for offside when the non-offending team scores a try.
I can't think of specific examples but I've definitely seen this before.
-
Chiefs in front. I presume every Chiefs player should be in the ABs now
-
Great try. All Chiefs at the moment. Hurricanes defence can't stop their momentum.
-
It's just a couple of small errors from the Canes in bad positions and the Chiefs pouncing.
-
@Tim said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Duluth Sotutu will find it twice as hard to make the ABs now.
Let’s be serious we all know Grace will get selected
-
How was Ratima allowed to get up after being tackled
-
Kirifi wasn't even on the ball
-
Narawa putting his own team under pressure by aimlessly running sideways away from support. Gives the Canes an opportunity to swing momentum.
-
Think Finau put big hits on both Cameron and Love there.
-
Sititi is impressive
-
-
@KiwiMurph Needs to learn the defensive side of the game.
-
Does that make TJP equal highest try scorer in SR history?
-
Horrible defense.
-
Satiti pathetic attempt.
-
@Tim said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
Satiti pathetic attempt.
Sotutu back to number 4 in the pecking order!!!
-
@Tim said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@KiwiMurph Needs to learn the defensive side of the game.
Yeah i'm grading on a curve - 21 year old who has barely played Super
-
@Frank said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
@Tim said in Hurricanes vs Chiefs:
Satiti pathetic attempt.
Sotutu back to number 4 in the pecking order!!!
You seem obsessed with Sotutu
-
Nice kick from DMac
-
Highly entertaining 2nd 40
-
Chiefs defence is porous - far too many missed or ineffective first tackles.
-
Looked like Moorby knocked it on there? Idk
-
Defence wins big matches. Chiefs should just give up if that is their standard.
-
Barrett family are dumb as fuck
-
Nothing in that
-
Dunno how many times the Hurricanes' attack broke down and the Chiefs still failed to capitalise.
-
Brilliant TRY
-
Great reffing .. Hardy the gronk 🤦🏽♂️
-
Naholo may have passed Nanai Seturo in the national left wing pecking order
Post 165 of 238