• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

All Blacks 2024

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
allblacks
7.4k Posts 135 Posters 648.3k Views
All Blacks 2024
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to Chris on last edited by
    #945

    @Chris Fair point, and we all love Whitelock, I personally would like to see us move on but as you said, on the other end of the argument, there are merits to it as well.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    ruggabee
    wrote on last edited by ruggabee
    #946

    You know I almost thought Razor would have registered enough credit in the bank (based off his resume & history of proven success at every level - when compared to Foster) so for people to question his decisions before the All Blacks have even played a single game yet seems odd to me. At least when Foster was appointed in 2020 most of us actually gave him a chance to prove us all wrong (based on results) in his first season - so we could then made a fair judgment of his decisions. Yet people on here are already spouting off on here with such conviction that this decision by Razor is objectively the wrong one when we haven't even seen the outcomes yet, lol.

    ChrisC mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
    3
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    replied to Mr Fish on last edited by
    #947

    @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    @Dan54 said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    @Windows97 said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    @Mr-Fish said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    > So the rules are all made up and don't really follow any rhyme or reason.

    Which sums up NZR at the moment quite succiently.

    Well it sums uo a forum, we don't really know what happened at negotiating times etc, but we can pretend.
    See Perenara's and BB were actually quite different, BB had signed with NZR before he went to Japan, where as TJ was wondering about going to league.

    Well, the rules are ostensibly quite clear - it's just that players are now negotiating their way out of having to follow them.

    Personally think evry rule should be reasonably flexible mate, well I think so anyway.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Windows97W Offline
    Windows97W Offline
    Windows97
    wrote on last edited by
    #948

    If your spending time now on a player that isn't going to be there in 4 years time then all you are doing is wasting time you could have spent developing another player.

    I think the rugby pubic would be more than understanding if we lose a few games but can see a clear developement pathway for new players.

    Bringing back old war horses and loosing will not go down well.

    I think Rassie said it right and it was something along the lines of "we'd love to have an 80% winning percentage, but in the years between the RWC you've got to select and take risks on young, new players". I presume so you can build the best team you can by the time the RWC rolls around.

    ChrisC A D 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #949

    So watching rugby live is the only way to properly watch rugby and analyse it?

    Windows97W 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to ruggabee on last edited by
    #950

    @ruggabee said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    You know I almost thought Razor would have registered enough credit in the bank (based off his resume & history of proven success at every level - when compared to Foster) so for people to question his desisions before the All Blacks have even played a single game yet seems odd to me. At least when Foster was appointed in 2020 most of us actually gave him a chance to prove us all wrong (based on results) in his first season - so we could then made a fair judgment of his decisions. Yet people on here are already spouting off on here with such conviction that this decision by Razor is objectively the wrong one when we haven't even seen the outcomes yet, lol.

    Yep well said.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #951

    im determined to reserve judgement until i see the first squad and first result

    the press is more likely to report on the contact with these old crusaders...and whilst im sure he is keeping tabs on them all....it doesn't mean he's not also in contact with all the young guys playing super rugby

    Razor has always struck me as a hard worker so i wouldnt be surprised to hear there is a lot of stuff not being reported

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Windows97W Offline
    Windows97W Offline
    Windows97
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #952

    @taniwharugby No not the only way, but you do pick up a lot of stuff (especially off the ball activity/movement and positional play) that the camera's misses.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Windows97 on last edited by Chris
    #953

    @Windows97 said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    Bringing back old war horses and loosing will not go down well.

    Yep SA was full of those in their last 2 WC winning squads not a heap of newbies,especially in the tight five.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Windows97W Offline
    Windows97W Offline
    Windows97
    wrote on last edited by
    #954

    Yeah you want your war horses in the RWC year - not in the year after the RWC.

    ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4lifeM Online
    mariner4life
    replied to ruggabee on last edited by
    #955

    @ruggabee said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    At least when Foster was appointed in 2020 most of us actually gave him a chance to prove us all wrong (based on results) in his first season - so we could then made a fair judgment of his decisions.

    lol you weren't here in late 2019 were you?

    The torches and pitchforks were out from day 1 (us Chiefs guys only had to dust them off from 2011)

    The AB coach is the shittest job in rugby, and surf jesus knew it when he took the job
    You are expected to win every test and every trophy available
    You are expected to pick the bet team every test
    You are expected to develop depth at the same time as playing the top team
    You are expected to not only win, but win by a lot, and play pretty rugby
    (add in, depending on who your assistants are, if you win it's because of their input, if you lose it's your fault)

    And anyone who thinks it isn't true doesn't spend any time on any rugby media at all

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    African Monkey
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #956

    @mariner4life Yeah Fozzie certainly got no free ride, he was abused from all angles before his first test in charge haha.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    ruggabee
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by ruggabee
    #957

    @mariner4life said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    @ruggabee said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    At least when Foster was appointed in 2020 most of us actually gave him a chance to prove us all wrong (based on results) in his first season - so we could then made a fair judgment of his decisions.

    lol you weren't here in late 2019 were you?

    The torches and pitchforks were out from day 1 (us Chiefs guys only had to dust them off from 2011)

    That was more people feeling disgruntled that Foster got the job due to cronyism/nepotism, at least the current coach got the job based on merit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Windows97 on last edited by
    #958

    @Windows97 only if you spend your time watching 1 player...

    They would have access to all the cameras giving them a far better ability to analyse players work on and off the ball, especially with the software they nno.dount have as well

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    replied to ruggabee on last edited by
    #959

    @ruggabee said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    Strange (especially - he's never been anything above average, even at Super level.)

    But for an injury, he would already be an AB. I agree with your point though.

    So Dane can expect a call soon? The options/depth/quality at hooker aren't any better than at lock.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ChrisC Offline
    ChrisC Offline
    Chris
    replied to Windows97 on last edited by
    #960

    @Windows97 said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    Yeah you want your war horses in the RWC year - not in the year after the RWC.

    Not the point more up sides to young players learning off Whitelock a real test lock than Vaai pretending to be one.
    Short sighted not looking at the potential overall long term benefits.

    F Windows97W 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to Windows97 on last edited by
    #961

    @Windows97 said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    If your spending time now on a player that isn't going to be there in 4 years time then all you are doing is wasting time you could have spent developing another player.

    I think the rugby pubic would be more than understanding if we lose a few games but can see a clear developement pathway for new players.

    Bringing back old war horses and loosing will not go down well.

    I think Rassie said it right and it was something along the lines of "we'd love to have an 80% winning percentage, but in the years between the RWC you've got to select and take risks on young, new players". I presume so you can build the best team you can by the time the RWC rolls around.

    Since when have we become SA and only cared about the RWC? Our expectations as a rugby nation has always been higher than theirs. The aim should still be to win ever test, that's what the ABs legacy is built on.

    While I don't necessarily agree with Whitelock coming back, surely people should be able to see the logic behind it.

    As for Rassie, this is the guy who picked two 37 year olds last year in Vermualen and Fourie, so he clearly values experience.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by Machpants
    #962

    I'd rather every single NZ eligible player was back here, bring them all back. Doesn't mean they have to start our even be in the abs squad. But the more here the merrier imo. As long as they're playing SR, and contributing to our scene

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #963

    The chat on here seems like a bit of an overreaction to Whitelock coming back to NZ.

    We could use the experience - especially at lock.

    Sounds good to me.

    Whitelock could be a nice bridge until the new brigade are ready/eligible (Holland, Hannah, Beehre etc etc)

    antipodeanA A 2 Replies Last reply
    9
  • antipodeanA Online
    antipodeanA Online
    antipodean
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #964

    @KiwiMurph said in All Blacks 2024 - looking forward:

    The chat on here seems like a bit of an overreaction to Whitelock coming back to NZ.

    alt text

    1 Reply Last reply
    4

All Blacks 2024
Sports Talk
allblacks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.