• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
springboksireland
646 Posts 74 Posters 36.7k Views
RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Halfout on last edited by
    #111

    @Halfout said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @DaGrubster

    To be honest I think the concern is that a 7:1 split will encourage bigger NFL style forwards who will blow themselves out in 45/50 minutes, leading to bigger collisions and more head injuries, rather than SA not playing fair. I think it’s a justifiable concern at a time when the health of players and the potential financial impact for World Rugby and individual Unions are major worries.

    Wait a minute. Aren't SA gambling on getting through the game without a back even getting injured? Less time on the field should reduce injuries to forwards too.

    Maybe they've got it right in terms of safety?

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Billy Tell on last edited by
    #112

    @Billy-Tell said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    I’m picking Ireland. Reckon for once they will be the business at the RWC. If Ireland man up in the forwards and diffuse the bombs what else do SA have to offer?

    A pact.
    Amazingly advanced communication devices.
    Incredibly tolerant and forgiving fanbase.
    Spectators high on participation.

    One of the above might not be accurate.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dodge
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #113

    @Bones this is a brilliant point re injury. Fresh players get injured less.

    My objection isn’t 7-1 vs 6-2 or specifically size of players, It’s the number of subs full stop - nothing to do with injury, merely because rugby is interesting when players get tired.

    Haven’t seen it but sure it’s been discussed, Ross Tucker’s podcast and views on the injury side of this question is great.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #114

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    W32
    wrote on last edited by
    #115

    Really don’t know how this will go. The springboks have been trying to play a more high tempo game. Nienaber emphasized this after the last game. Think they will try the bludgeon helter skelter disruptive approach. And I don’t think SA are confident of a win at all. But Ireland are. Not sure that’s good for Ireland. But I would prefer to play France anyway.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • The IrishmanT Offline
    The IrishmanT Offline
    The Irishman
    wrote on last edited by
    #116

    You'd prefer to play France in a home tournament over a badly coached AB's team? Really?

    W S 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    W32
    replied to The Irishman on last edited by
    #117

    @The-Irishman yes. Don’t think the ABs can be crap for much longer… should start to rebound. Also think France are in decline

    S BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to W32 on last edited by
    #118

    @W32 rugby PTSD at play here 🙂

    W 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to The Irishman on last edited by
    #119

    @The-Irishman Ireland don't care who they play in the QF. Their battle will be in their heads.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    W32
    replied to stodders on last edited by
    #120

    @stodders lol. Maybe

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Darren
    replied to reprobate on last edited by
    #121

    @reprobate said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @game_film that interview is posted on another thread. it was very refreshing to hear someone say something sensible about dealing with rush defence finally, just a shame it wasn't a NZer.
    we still seem to think the best way to deal with it is a shitload of short kicks, combined with getting caught behind the advantage line. which is a particular fucking travesty when we have had the world's best passing halfback in the side for about a decade.

    I did notice us attacking the blind a lot more this year, one way to beat the rush defense is to avoid it I guess.

    And for the 7-1 Are forwards really that tired after 40 minutes anyway? Would have thought everyone is pretty fit nowadays.

    SmutsS P canefanC 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SmutsS Offline
    SmutsS Offline
    Smuts
    replied to Darren on last edited by
    #122

    @Darren said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @reprobate said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @game_film that interview is posted on another thread. it was very refreshing to hear someone say something sensible about dealing with rush defence finally, just a shame it wasn't a NZer.
    we still seem to think the best way to deal with it is a shitload of short kicks, combined with getting caught behind the advantage line. which is a particular fucking travesty when we have had the world's best passing halfback in the side for about a decade.

    I did notice us attacking the blind a lot more this year, one way to beat the rush defense is to avoid it I guess.

    And for the 7-1 Are forwards really that tired after 40 minutes anyway? Would have thought everyone is pretty fit nowadays.

    Maybe ask the AB pack that played at Twickenham?

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to W32 on last edited by
    #123

    @W32 said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @The-Irishman yes. Don’t think the ABs can be crap for much longer… should start to rebound.

    I've no doubt Foster is up to this challenge. Loves to prove the doubters wrong.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Darren
    replied to Smuts on last edited by
    #124

    @Smuts said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @Darren said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @reprobate said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @game_film that interview is posted on another thread. it was very refreshing to hear someone say something sensible about dealing with rush defence finally, just a shame it wasn't a NZer.
    we still seem to think the best way to deal with it is a shitload of short kicks, combined with getting caught behind the advantage line. which is a particular fucking travesty when we have had the world's best passing halfback in the side for about a decade.

    I did notice us attacking the blind a lot more this year, one way to beat the rush defense is to avoid it I guess.

    And for the 7-1 Are forwards really that tired after 40 minutes anyway? Would have thought everyone is pretty fit nowadays.

    Maybe ask the AB pack that played at Twickenham?

    I think that game was well over before subs came on
    And in the Auckland game, the AB's really won that in the first 15 minutes

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Halfout
    wrote on last edited by
    #125

    What’s giving me some optimism as an Irish fan is the fact that the SA management seem to be reacting to Ireland in terms of tactics and selection. They really seem to be talking themselves up, which is something that generally you’d expect the lesser team to be doing. Dare I say it, but they sound and are acting like we used to sound and act when we knew that we were the underdogs. Might as well enjoy it while we can.

    W BonesB The IrishmanT 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    W32
    replied to Halfout on last edited by
    #126

    @Halfout SA are the underdogs. Rated lower and have lost to Ireland lately. The definition of underdogs. What team talks themselves down?

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to Halfout on last edited by
    #127

    @Halfout huh? Didn't they even name their team first? That's an odd way to look at it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to Darren on last edited by
    #128

    @Darren said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @reprobate said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @game_film that interview is posted on another thread. it was very refreshing to hear someone say something sensible about dealing with rush defence finally, just a shame it wasn't a NZer.
    we still seem to think the best way to deal with it is a shitload of short kicks, combined with getting caught behind the advantage line. which is a particular fucking travesty when we have had the world's best passing halfback in the side for about a decade.

    I did notice us attacking the blind a lot more this year, one way to beat the rush defense is to avoid it I guess.

    And for the 7-1 Are forwards really that tired after 40 minutes anyway? Would have thought everyone is pretty fit nowadays.

    Most of the Bok props aren't.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • The IrishmanT Offline
    The IrishmanT Offline
    The Irishman
    replied to Halfout on last edited by
    #129

    @Halfout said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    What’s giving me some optimism as an Irish fan is the fact that the SA management seem to be reacting to Ireland in terms of tactics and selection. They really seem to be talking themselves up, which is something that generally you’d expect the lesser team to be doing. Dare I say it, but they sound and are acting like we used to sound and act when we knew that we were the underdogs. Might as well enjoy it while we can.

    Nah they are not talking themselves up, they are 100% confident in the belief in what they are doing and how they plan to execute it. I never remember an Ireland team in the past talking themselves up either to be honest, not sure were that is coming from. I have no doubt the South Africans believe they are the better team and are relishing showing that off in this match.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Darren on last edited by
    #130

    @Darren said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @reprobate said in RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland:

    @game_film that interview is posted on another thread. it was very refreshing to hear someone say something sensible about dealing with rush defence finally, just a shame it wasn't a NZer.
    we still seem to think the best way to deal with it is a shitload of short kicks, combined with getting caught behind the advantage line. which is a particular fucking travesty when we have had the world's best passing halfback in the side for about a decade.

    I did notice us attacking the blind a lot more this year, one way to beat the rush defense is to avoid it I guess.

    And for the 7-1 Are forwards really that tired after 40 minutes anyway? Would have thought everyone is pretty fit nowadays.

    Maximise optimal performance. And many of your forwards look like they prefer weights to cardio

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    2

RWC Week 3: Springboks v Ireland
Rugby Matches
springboksireland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.