Australia v All Blacks - Bled I

[Steve]

@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@Stargazer said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

That try should have been given.

9.1 Foul Play
Obstruction

1. When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, neither player may charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.

it was simultaneous at worst. he was fair game for me.

[Chris]

Luke Jacobson putting in some decent clean out hits.

[sparky]

Lord Bledisloe staying in NZ for another year.

[canefan]

@Frank said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@sparky said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Great cameo by Rougard. He’s a keeper!

Another Frenchman.

Or Saffa? Rougaard...

[Stargazer]

@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@Frank said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@sparky said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Great cameo by Rougard. He’s a keeper!

Another Frenchman.

Or Saffa?

Only if of French heritage.

[booboo]

Subliminal advertising ...

Cadbury in the background of the coach's box ...

"Eddie's Favourites"

" Dark"

[nostrildamus]

Sam gets up like a granddad but still more effective now than Retallick IMO.

[sparky]

@Chris said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Luke Jacobson putting in some decent clean out hits.

He’ll be on the flight to France if he stays for.

[Steve]

@Chris said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Luke Jacobson putting in some decent clean out hits.

Would you say he has a "hard shoulder" on him?

[Stargazer]

Whittaker's is way better than Cadbury.

[NTA]

@antipodean said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@Stargazer said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

That try should have been given.

9.1 Foul Play
Obstruction

1. When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, neither player may charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.

Party pooper!

That's not relevant. A player touching the ball is fair game.

Then he needs to tackle him.
Pushing is not tackling.
And he was on the ground.
So he's not allowed to touch him.

Which penalty do you choose?

[Chris]

@Steve
Yep

[nostrildamus]

Did Wayne finally notice a dummy runner obstructing? Wow.

[booboo]

Did Barnesy suggest they chop a coldie?

[canefan]

@booboo said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Subliminal advertising ...

Cadbury in the background of the coach's box ...

"Eddie's Favourites"

" Dark"

[antipodean]

@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@antipodean said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@Stargazer said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

That try should have been given.

9.1 Foul Play
Obstruction

1. When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, neither player may charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.

Party pooper!

That's not relevant. A player touching the ball is fair game.

Then he needs to tackle him.

Wrong. Pushing a player with the ball isn't foul play.

Pushing is not tackling.
And he was on the ground.

No he wasn't.

[booboo]

@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@booboo said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Subliminal advertising ...

Cadbury in the background of the coach's box ...

"Eddie's Favourites"

" Dark"

Post of the night

[nostrildamus]

@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Pushing is not tackling.

It is according to vintage Quade Cooper.

[Canes4life]

Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.

[Tim]

Did enough when it mattered. Forwards were a bit off as a collective tonight. Need to be better against France.

Another hiding for Eddie.