Super Rugby 2024
-
@OomPB said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Machpants it's the area. They are working on it. May move to UJ (uni of Joburh). The Stormers have host some match esat Craven Stadium on Stellenbosch with great success while they replaced CT Stadium play area.
Ellis Park being huge kills the atmosphere even with a decent crowd. Same as our SR games in places like the Cake Tin and Eden Park, too big and feel empty even when there is 10k+ people
-
From the Blues Facebook re: preseason games in Japan -
-
@SBW1 said in Super Rugby 2024:
Really love to see the South African sides back in the comp, surely the addition of a few in the future isn't off the cards.
The Highlanders would love for that to happen too as it would give them a few more winable games, especially if some of the Aussie teams are given the heave hoe.
-
@SBW1 said in Super Rugby 2024:
Really love to see the South African sides back in the comp, surely the addition of a few in the future isn't off the cards.
I think that's got to be unlikely given they must enjoy their teams being somewhat competitive now?
-
@Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2024:
@Higgins there is also early talks that the struggling Rebels may not last until after 2025 due to financial issues. A merger with the Brumbies could be on the cards, a positive move if it happens IMO.
Terrible outcome. Pull home games from Canberra to play to even fewer supporters.
-
@antipodean Aus don’t have the depth for five teams so if it does happen it’s not the worst news.
-
@Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2024:
@antipodean Aus don’t have the depth for five teams so if it does happen it’s not the worst news.
Half-pregnant teams are not the answer.
-
@Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2024:
@antipodean Aus don’t have the depth for five teams so if it does happen it’s not the worst news.
It would be a must happen start. Sadly, Aust don't even have the depth to support 4 teams. I think with 3 teams they could do OK. It would take a few years though
And I would just drop the Rebels if possible. Not merge.
-
@Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2024:
@gt12 Aus having 5 teams isn’t the answer either.
Agreed. I'm not arguing for five teams.
-
if you blokes are so set on shrinking an already too small competition, why are the Highlanders never on the chopping block?
a record of 9-19 over the past 2 years is hardly high performance. Same number of wins as the Force, and 1 more than the Rebels. And they just lost their best player. -
@mariner4life said in Super Rugby 2024:
if you blokes are so set on shrinking an already too small competition, why are the Highlanders never on the chopping block?
a record of 9-19 over the past 2 years is hardly high performance. Same number of wins as the Force, and 1 more than the Rebels. And they just lost their best player.Because NZR aren't in the shit. And have enough players to support 5 teams. But the player allocation needs to be improved somehow
If they were (in the shit) and needed to drop one team the Highlanders would be the team to go. Based on population (but also performance)
And it's a small but very flawed competition. In part due to Aussie having too many teams. Without fixing this super rugby will slowly die. Say 5+3+2 still is 10 teams. It is better to have 10 even teams, say, playing two rounds than 12 uneven teams. Get the base right then look at adding more teams.
-
@mariner4life said in Super Rugby 2024:
if you blokes are so set on shrinking an already too small competition, why are the Highlanders never on the chopping block?
a record of 9-19 over the past 2 years is hardly high performance. Same number of wins as the Force, and 1 more than the Rebels. And they just lost their best player. -
@Winger said in Super Rugby 2024:
@mariner4life said in Super Rugby 2024:
if you blokes are so set on shrinking an already too small competition, why are the Highlanders never on the chopping block?
a record of 9-19 over the past 2 years is hardly high performance. Same number of wins as the Force, and 1 more than the Rebels. And they just lost their best player.Because NZR aren't in the shit. And have enough players to support 5 teams. But the player allocation needs to be improved somehow
If they were (in the shit) and needed to drop one team the Highlanders would be the team to go. Based on population (but also performance)
And it's a small but very flawed competition. In part due to Aussie having too many teams. Without fixing this super rugby will slowly die. Say 5+3+2 still is 10 teams. It is better to have 10 even teams, say, playing two rounds than 12 uneven teams. Get the base right then look at adding more teams.
Putting aside the issue of fewer teams for a competition, if you're going to advocate fewer teams for Aus, then MP needs to be removed.
-
More likely teams added like a team from Argentina,US team plus there is talk in the media of a SA team based in Perth
the Cheetahs,Pumas or a combined team from both of them.
All speculation but has some traction due to the potential to bring bigger markets in to the comp,TV rights sponsorship,fan base etc.
In the end they will have to grow SR and include more markets to sustain it. -
This post is deleted!
-