QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes
-
@Crazy-Horse said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@hydro11 I don't care whether it was a try or not. I disagree with what he said being called 'classless'. The threshold for classless is a hell of a lot higher than that in my book.
He deflected the loss to the TMO to cover up for his own players who should have got the job done. Refusing to take responsibility and blaming other people or processes when you had every opportunity to get the outcome you wanted, meets my definition of classless.
-
@hydro11 said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Crazy-Horse said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@hydro11 I don't care whether it was a try or not. I disagree with what he said being called 'classless'. The threshold for classless is a hell of a lot higher than that in my book.
He deflected the loss to the TMO to cover up for his own players who should have got the job done. Refusing to take responsibility and blaming other people or processes when you had every opportunity to get the outcome you wanted, meets my definition of classless.
You are reading a hell of a lot into it.
-
@Crazy-Horse said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@hydro11 said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@Crazy-Horse said in QF: Brumbies v Hurricanes:
@hydro11 I don't care whether it was a try or not. I disagree with what he said being called 'classless'. The threshold for classless is a hell of a lot higher than that in my book.
He deflected the loss to the TMO to cover up for his own players who should have got the job done. Refusing to take responsibility and blaming other people or processes when you had every opportunity to get the outcome you wanted, meets my definition of classless.
You are reading a hell of a lot into it.
Especially when going off the twist of a Stuff article.
I really suspect that had you heard the words in context and tone it wouldn't be half as bad.I do get the point though that the failings fall on his shoulders
