Blues vs Jags
-
<p>haha, love it, chcking for foul play by the guy on the deck...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ranger heavily involved in that passage</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tim" data-cid="569193" data-time="1459581473">
<div>
<p>Oh come on, winning the "Championship" means nothing. The shield is completely random.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Arguably keeping Counties in the top division year after year is as much of an achievement as winning with a star studded Canterbury side.</p> -
<p>holy shit, that was magic between Ranger & West!!</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Nepia" data-cid="569198" data-time="1459581713"><p>Arguably keeping Counties in the top division year after year is as much of an achievement as winning with a star studded Canterbury side.</p></blockquote>
<br>
Four titles in a row was pretty damn impressive. -
15-6 at the break, what's everyone complaining about?
-
<p>15-6 at the break</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crash" data-cid="569207" data-time="1459581877">
<div>
<p>Ranger just needs to keep building week on week - I'd love to see him Back in Black</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>hes gotta get game time too....</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Tim" data-cid="569201" data-time="1459581774">
<div>
<p>Four titles in a row was pretty damn impressive.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Meh, with those squads it should be every year, no losses and full bonus points (following the minimising of achievements mode established on the previous page ;)).</p> -
The Blues have been far from perfect, but given they got shat on by the ref for the first 20, I think they'll be pretty satisfied at the break. Need to score first in the 2nd 40 to break the Jags spirit.
-
<p>A lot to work on but it's hard when we seem to get these muppet refs week after week.</p>