Bledisloe 2

Mackerzzzz

That's bells hand isn't it?

canefan

That's some go-go gadget shit if he's scored that

Amazing control and no aussie there to strip it out

nostrildamus

wow that will be contentious.

broughie

Looks to me that the Ozzie hand was keeping the ball in contact with Whitelocks hand and that should be a try. Fricken excellent.

African Monkey

@gt12 Pretty hard to overturn at the same time.

gt12

I wouldn’t give that.

My Jinx is still working!

Stargazer

No clear separation. Should be a try.

Nepia

I'm confused, how did Whitelock still have control of that? I could only see two Oz hands.

Chris

That is remarkable by Whitelock .

nostrildamus

I was just going to say BBBR was more visible than Sam in general play!

canefan

wow that will be contentious.

At least Richie was made to wait before the conversion was taken.....

ACT Crusader

Whitelock with a Spider-Man effort

Chris

I'm confused, how did Whitelock still have control of that? I could only see two Oz hands.

One hand was Whitelocks.

bayimports

I'm confused, how did Whitelock still have control of that? I could only see two Oz hands.

his taped hand stayed on the side

taniwharugby

So that's on the refs initial call really...

canefan

I'm confused, how did Whitelock still have control of that? I could only see two Oz hands.

One hand was Whitelock's

nostrildamus

@nostrildamus said in Bledisloe 2:

wow that will be contentious.

At least Richie was made to wait before the conversion was taken.....

yes and the ref was probably in a better position than the camera...

Mackerzzzz

Tmo correct. No clear evidence. But for me bell grounded it not sam

antipodean

Nothing contentious about it if the TMO can see Whitelock never releases the ball, ergo he has possession and grounds the ball.

gt12

Regardless of the final decision, I really like them taking the Wobs on around the ruck for multiple phases like that.

The Silver Fern