Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
-
Great stuff, Guppy!
That drop of Neesh's could have been very costly, but his ass is saved!
I'd be bowling Boult, Henry and Southee for the next half dozen overs to get at least one more.
If that means Santner and Bracewell have to bowl three late, that's a risk we have to take.
-
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Great stuff, Guppy!
That drop of Neesh's could have been very costly, but his ass is saved!
I'd be bowling Boult, Henry and Southee for the next half dozen overs to get at least one more.
If that means Santner and Bracewell have to bowl three late, that's a risk we have to take.
Don’t forget Dazza.
-
@bayimports said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@Donsteppa probably best to go back to boult now though
upvoting myself, Maxi is Boults bunny, should have been done sooner
-
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Got 'eem!
That was what we needed.
Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.
Pile in Little Kane.
You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Got 'eem!
That was what we needed.
Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.
Pile in Little Kane.
You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.
Seems possible to me ...
-
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Your best bowler is Boult.
You bowl him out now. No question!
When he's bowling well he is our bowler, surely?