• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
381 Posts 29 Posters 16.3k Views
Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Do not disturb
    B Do not disturb
    bayimports
    replied to bayimports on last edited by
    #224

    @bayimports said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @Donsteppa probably best to go back to boult now though

    upvoting myself, Maxi is Boults bunny, should have been done sooner

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #225

    @Crucial Yeah - we'll just have to squeeze three out of all of them.

    Santner is a T20 specialist, so having someone come at him might actually help - especially if it is an Aussie tailender.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by Chris B.
    #226

    Got 'eem!

    That was what we needed.

    Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.

    Pile in Little Kane.

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #227

    and again! Smith gone

    quality Southee

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #228

    On your bike, Steve!

    Pile in Little Kane - no point at all in holding back your best bowlers.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #229

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Got 'eem!

    That was what we needed.

    Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.

    Pile in Little Kane.

    You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.

    MajorRageM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #230

    @Chris-B that shot looked ugly

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    replied to NTA on last edited by JK
    #231

    @NTA said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Right, well... How you gonna fuck this one up?

    Hold my beer bat…

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #232

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Got 'eem!

    That was what we needed.

    Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.

    Pile in Little Kane.

    You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.

    Seems possible to me ...

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #233

    Your best bowler is Boult.

    You bowl him out now. No question!

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #234

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Your best bowler is Boult.

    You bowl him out now. No question!

    When he's bowling well he is our bowler, surely?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #235

    Wow.

    Dumb by Zampa. Gets out to Boult's last ball, when we've largely got Santner and Neesh left!

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #236

    Why are we now giving Bracewell another???

    FFS - are our strategist thick fluffybunnies?!!! 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #237

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Wow.

    Dumb by Zampa. Gets out to Boult's last ball, when we've largely got Santner and Neesh left!

    Don’t worry Bracewell is there to assist (the batsmen) too

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #238

    13 run final over is actually criminal on a slow as pitch that the batsmen have been getting hardly anything from 🙄

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT CrusaderA Do not disturb
    ACT Crusader
    replied to MajorRage on last edited by
    #239

    @MajorRage said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Got 'eem!

    That was what we needed.

    Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.

    Pile in Little Kane.

    You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.

    Seems possible to me ...

    Not even close…

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #240

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @MajorRage said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    Got 'eem!

    That was what we needed.

    Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.

    Pile in Little Kane.

    You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.

    Seems possible to me ...

    Not even close…

    looked so likely for so long. Aus are ridiculous like that

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    replied to ACT Crusader on last edited by
    #241

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    13 run final over is actually criminal on a slow as pitch that the batsmen have been getting hardly anything from 🙄

    Last couple of overs were piss poor and no idea why Bracewell got the 2nd to last and not Mitch or Satnav. Should never be someone a bit shit that the batsman have had a sighter at!

    Comms are saying there was a plumb lbw that would have saved 30 runs, but it looked like there was a big inside edge spike on snicko to me -but I need to see that again.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • canefanC Online
    canefanC Online
    canefan
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #242

    @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    @ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:

    13 run final over is actually criminal on a slow as pitch that the batsmen have been getting hardly anything from 🙄

    Last couple of overs were piss poor and no idea why Bracewell got the 2nd to last and not Mitch or Satnav. Should never be someone a bit shit that the batsman have had a sighter at!

    Comms are saying there was a plumb lbw that would have saved 30 runs, but it looked like there was a big inside edge spike on snicko to me -but I need to see that again.

    Is there nothing Bracewell can't do? Singlehandedly carry the opposition back into the game.... 🤦🤷

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DonsteppaD Online
    DonsteppaD Online
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #243

    Top order looking like a cat on a hot tin roof so far.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.