• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

The Current State of Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.5k Posts 90 Posters 154.3k Views
The Current State of Rugby
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamusN Offline
    nostrildamus
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #1219

    @antipodean said in The Current State of Rugby:

    @nostrildamus said in The Current State of Rugby:

    @NTA said in The Current State of Rugby:

    @Kiwiwomble said in The Current State of Rugby:
    lol yeah do you know many ABs fans?

    😉

    easier to find than many Wallaby fans..

    I don't know about anyone else, but my social media is a completely Wallaby supporter free zone. No one, and that's not an exaggeration, has posted on Facebook about it. It's as if collectively they've decided to ignore it.

    To misquote Blam Blam Blam "There are no bad sports news, in Australia...there are no decent props, on our farms.."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #1220
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1221

    To me the RWC is highlighting a massive issue with how World Rugby "administers" the elite game.

    If you are a 6N/RC team, then the International game is fucking apples. Prime home and away fixturing, as many tests a year as you want. Inside windows, outside windows, doesn't matter.

    Everyone else? Fuck you.

    Look at that ridiculous stat that Samoa haven't played Argentina in like 20 years. How many tests have Fiji had in the last few years?
    Then you throw in the stories about the T2 sides sleeping in swags and cooking their own meals.

    World Rugby love to talk about "growing the game" but what do they do except serve shit teams up for ritual slaughter by their "betters" every four years, while basically ignoring them the rest of the time.

    taniwharugbyT Rancid SchnitzelR 2 Replies Last reply
    10
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by taniwharugby
    #1222

    @mariner4life they give them a rougher ride at the judiciary...

    Based off other tackles thus far, Deysel should be 3 or 4 weeks with a week off (i dont know his history) but easy player for them to make an example of, more so the resulting (potentially) injury

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by Rancid Schnitzel
    #1223

    @mariner4life said in The Current State of Rugby:

    To me the RWC is highlighting a massive issue with how World Rugby "administers" the elite game.

    If you are a 6N/RC team, then the International game is fucking apples. Prime home and away fixturing, as many tests a year as you want. Inside windows, outside windows, doesn't matter.

    Everyone else? Fuck you.

    Look at that ridiculous stat that Samoa haven't played Argentina in like 20 years. How many tests have Fiji had in the last few years?
    Then you throw in the stories about the T2 sides sleeping in swags and cooking their own meals.

    World Rugby love to talk about "growing the game" but what do they do except serve shit teams up for ritual slaughter by their "betters" every four years, while basically ignoring them the rest of the time.

    The hypocrisy is staggering. It used to be that we copped shit every 4 years for not doing enough for Islander sides that were coached by NZers, with players trained in NZ, and who in many cases were either born and/or raised in NZ. But yeah Romania is killing it these days. One of the things that greatly hindered rugby's growth back in the day was the almost fanatical desire of those in charge to not let any of the riff raff be involved. Unfortunately not much appears to have changed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #1224

    The moment that WR didn't step in to try stop the Saffa's going north highlights how little they give a fuck about "world" rugby.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    wrote on last edited by
    #1225

    this is an example of where both Otago and the Highlanders are when it comes to marketing, social media and fan engagement....ive seen loads of posts like this....what are they trying to achieve? is it really that hard to have "boys want to see you on the sideline saturday night!" with a link to tickets or the like.....just post some random pics without context like your Gran

    374be81f-de11-46c0-a81f-ab27a589467a-image.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #1226

    Whoever does the media for the Blues is doing a good job IMO

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Dan54D Offline
    Dan54D Offline
    Dan54
    wrote on last edited by
    #1227

    Just wondering, at test level and teams wasting time , players with 'injuries' etc, would the game be served by having a time limit on injury breaks. If a player needs longer than 30 seconds to be attended to he does it on sideline, and if it amore serious and he can't move or be moved in that time, stop clock and he HAS to be replaced for game. I have heard suggestions of stopping clock , but that could have games going for too long, as well as still allowing teams to piss around to get back breath.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • canefanC Offline
    canefanC Offline
    canefan
    replied to Dan54 on last edited by
    #1228

    @Dan54 said in The Current State of Rugby:

    Just wondering, at test level and teams wasting time , players with 'injuries' etc, would the game be served by having a time limit on injury breaks. If a player needs longer than 30 seconds to be attended to he does it on sideline, and if it amore serious and he can't move or be moved in that time, stop clock and he HAS to be replaced for game. I have heard suggestions of stopping clock , but that could have games going for too long, as well as still allowing teams to piss around to get back breath.

    Rugby could learn from football. Anyone who needs treatment has to go to the sideline and can't return until the next stoppage

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    wrote on last edited by
    #1229

    Can probably go in here...

    Guess it's been a little while.since we had calls for SA into the 6N...

    Irish pundit calls for Italy to be axed from Six Nations to make way for South Africa

    Irish pundit calls for Italy to be axed from Six Nations to make way for South Africa

    Irish TV commentator and rugby reporter Hugh Cahill has called for Italy to be axed from the Six Nations following their 96-17 defeat to the All Blacks in Lyon.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #1230

    @taniwharugby He knows rugby about as much as Christy Doran. Perhaps kick Italy out when Ireland can put 96 points on them...

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1231

    Get. Fucked

    I'm watching France v Italy

    The italian try has just been rubbed out by the TMO because someone got cleaned out in the chest, a fact all 4 officials agreed. The cleaned player dived forward in to the contact.

    But what really fucks me off is an at least 4 breakdowns in the passage of play all 4 officials allowed French players to pile in the side, collapse rucks and upset ball with no sanction. But hitting someone in the chest gets you rewarded.

    Fuck off

    1 Reply Last reply
    12
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #1232

    And no no one looks at the first Irish try which is the very definition of obstruction. The Irish player runs behind a lead runner. Said.lead runner bowls over the Scottish hooker, and the Irish runner runs through the hole that creates. Absolutely no review. At all.

    What even is this sport?

    A MajorRageM 2 Replies Last reply
    10
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1233

    @mariner4life said in The Current State of Rugby:

    And no no one looks at the first Irish try which is the very definition of obstruction. The Irish player runs behind a lead runner. Said.lead runner bowls over the Scottish hooker, and the Irish runner runs through the hole that creates. Absolutely no review. At all.

    What even is this sport?

    Yeah that was a shocker. How the TMO missed it is beyond me.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by mariner4life
    #1234

    Because I think that there is an unconscious bias in refereeing

    If the fancied team does something good, it's because they are so good at rugby

    If the unfancied team did something good, it's because they did something nefarious

    I see too many examples of it happening to not be at least a little true

    And I say that as a supporter of a team who gets those calls often

    voodooV gt12G 2 Replies Last reply
    10
  • voodooV Offline
    voodooV Offline
    voodoo
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1235

    @mariner4life said in The Current State of Rugby:

    Because I think that there is an unconscious bias in refereeing

    If the fancied team does something good, it's because they are so good at rugby

    If the unfancied team did something good, it's because they did something nefarious

    I see too many examples of it happening to not be at least a little true

    And I say that as a supporter of a team who gets those calls often

    I’d say it’s pretty indisputable right now

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
  • MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRageM Offline
    MajorRage
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1236

    @mariner4life the 2 Irish itv pundits BOD and Best both couldn’t believe it wasn’t looked at.

    When the TMO outright lied on the touch call, incompetence went out the window & there was genuine reason to believe in a fix.

    canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #1237

    @mariner4life said in The Current State of Rugby:

    Because I think that there is an unconscious bias in refereeing

    If the fancied team does something good, it's because they are so good at rugby

    If the unfancied team did something good, it's because they did something nefarious

    I see too many examples of it happening to not be at least a little true

    And I say that as a supporter of a team who gets those calls often

    If someone jumps up and down about it, we may get some benefit next week.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #1238

    @gt12 sad as it may be, we need to highlight these, wave oirnarms, fall over and exaggerate these illegal contacts, then they will be looked at closer, if they are pulled up or not...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

The Current State of Rugby
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.