NZ tour of India
-
-
@chris-b said in NZ tour of India:
@damo said in NZ tour of India:
Amazing review. He didn't hesitate for a moment. I figured he must have hit it, but no - he just knew where the stumps end.
No use saving the review for the tail?
Yes but that kind of thinking normally takes a few moments consideration and consultation with the non-striker.
Mitchell reviewed almost immediately. That's normally a sign that a batsman just knows they aren't out.
-
-
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
@damo said in NZ tour of India:
Now we need to bat well.
The path to victory is clear. Bat for 2.5 days and declare 200-250 ahead. Then bowl India out in 4.5 sessions.
Fuck me. We’ll be doing incredibly well to avoid the follow on at this rate
Exactly. Not pass the follow on, get put in again, then bat well and set India a target on day 5.
What did you think I meant?
-
Looks like they expect Patel to do all the work with the bat as well. Somerville was clearly a selection to lengthen the batting...
I didn't think for a moment that Stead was serious about batting Mitchell at 3, given the history of Ravindra plus the option of asking Blundell to open, or Taylor and Nicholls to shift up one, but...
Taylor has gone a series too far.