NZ tour of India
-
The Hobart 1997 test ended with Doull and possibly O'Connor or Chris Drumm batting the final hour. It probably makes the list with an asterix as we only ended up in that situation due to some cavalier batting after a sporting deceleration by Mark Taylor.
-
@rotated said in NZ tour of India:
@donsteppa said in NZ tour of India:
That's the best 18* that Ravindra may ever score...
If he has got mettle like that he may well make many more runs for NZ.
We wasn't named in part for Rahul Dravid for nothing.
He and Latham need to run the net sessions and show everyone else how to ignore scoring zones and hang around.
Nice surprise to wake up to the draw I must say.
India handed us that draw then just fell short of clawing it back. They also made bad decisions particularly by not attacking earlier as if they thought the low run rate was going to rocket away like a T20.
There was no way that pitch was going to accommodate a win for us. It was going to be draw or loss so in that regard we did well.
Stole some points off India in the World Championship too.Now let's see Wags back. Roscoe find a groove and our middle order develop some steel.
-
@canefan said in NZ tour of India:
@shark said in NZ tour of India:
I'm torn. Ordinarily I'd want to see us go at this total. Any time. And if anything more so now as we're the fucking world champions and should live up to that. But I also get why an away draw is important in the TWC cycle. History will judge us if we bat out a draw. But I'm a bit put out that we're playing this safe.
Look at what happened in the first innings. Seems the pitch has the potential to surrender wickets fast
Can you tell me who's gonna win the Superbowl as well??
-
Draw is an outstanding result. Well done to the lads, and particularly the last pair - outstanding.
I miss elite umpires, but thank god for DRS. It's a 3 day game wihtout it.
That's one to savour
Edit: and refer my earlier nostrildamus comment about chasing 150 being tough, and 200+ being a miracle. We could have had a crack at 51/5, but couldn't quite finish them off. India 51/5 --> 234/7 --> no chance of a win.
-
@shark said in NZ tour of India:
@canefan said in NZ tour of India:
@shark said in NZ tour of India:
I'm torn. Ordinarily I'd want to see us go at this total. Any time. And if anything more so now as we're the fucking world champions and should live up to that. But I also get why an away draw is important in the TWC cycle. History will judge us if we bat out a draw. But I'm a bit put out that we're playing this safe.
Look at what happened in the first innings. Seems the pitch has the potential to surrender wickets fast
Can you tell me who's gonna win the Superbowl as well??
If you throw enough shit eventually something sticks to the wall
-
@canefan said in NZ tour of India:
@shark said in NZ tour of India:
@canefan said in NZ tour of India:
@shark said in NZ tour of India:
I'm torn. Ordinarily I'd want to see us go at this total. Any time. And if anything more so now as we're the fucking world champions and should live up to that. But I also get why an away draw is important in the TWC cycle. History will judge us if we bat out a draw. But I'm a bit put out that we're playing this safe.
Look at what happened in the first innings. Seems the pitch has the potential to surrender wickets fast
Can you tell me who's gonna win the Superbowl as well??
If you throw enough shit eventually something sticks to the wall
are you ... an opinion writer for NZ Herald?
-
@rotated said in NZ tour of India:
@donsteppa said in NZ tour of India:
That's the best 18* that Ravindra may ever score...
If he has got mettle like that he may well make many more runs for NZ.
We wasn't named in part for Rahul Dravid for nothing.
Rachin is a product of my old school and was seen as a bit of a prodigy when he was dominating at that level a few years ago.
It's awesome to see him come through the levels and survive that barrage last night in his first test. The kid is probably more suited to the top order but he will relish any opportunity at this point. He could become a real gold nugget for us if his bowling can match his batting.
-
@booboo said in NZ tour of India:
@cyclops said in NZ tour of India:
Wow, add that one to the list of great escapes!
Coney, Chats
Astle, Morrison
Astle, Allott
Greatbatch et al (Sneds)
Ish
Coney, Crowe (1983 v England)
Troupe, BoockPlease add.
'Not losing' like that is as good as winning.
Fuck test cricket is awesome.
x100, see I don't watch T20, and not even a 50 over fan although I do watch a little!!
And I like the list you got there Cyclops and will remember the Coney/Chats partnership forever, and even if during it at one stage Chats played a ball for a 4, and as he so unused to actually hitting the ball ,I think he ran past Coney twice who saw it was a boundary from the start, Chats never really looked but just ran like a rabbit, it really was funny to see! -
@nzzp said in NZ tour of India:
@canefan said in NZ tour of India:
@shark said in NZ tour of India:
@canefan said in NZ tour of India:
@shark said in NZ tour of India:
I'm torn. Ordinarily I'd want to see us go at this total. Any time. And if anything more so now as we're the fucking world champions and should live up to that. But I also get why an away draw is important in the TWC cycle. History will judge us if we bat out a draw. But I'm a bit put out that we're playing this safe.
Look at what happened in the first innings. Seems the pitch has the potential to surrender wickets fast
Can you tell me who's gonna win the Superbowl as well??
If you throw enough shit eventually something sticks to the wall
are you ... an opinion writer for NZ Herald?
I could get a secondary job....
-
@dan54 said in NZ tour of India:
@booboo said in NZ tour of India:
@cyclops said in NZ tour of India:
Wow, add that one to the list of great escapes!
Coney, Chats
Astle, Morrison
Astle, Allott
Greatbatch et al (Sneds)
Ish
Coney, Crowe (1983 v England)
Troupe, BoockPlease add.
'Not losing' like that is as good as winning.
Fuck test cricket is awesome.
x100, see I don't watch T20, and not even a 50 over fan although I do watch a little!!
And I like the list you got there Cyclops and will remember the Coney/Chats partnership forever, and even if during it at one stage Chats played a ball for a 4, and as he so unused to actually hitting the ball ,I think he ran past Coney twice who saw it was a boundary from the start, Chats never really looked but just ran like a rabbit, it really was funny to see!Chats always looked so scared of the ball. Which is not unreasonable since one almost killed him!
-
It was nice that Somerville and Ravindra got over the fact they were totally innocuous with the ball and provided us with some hugely valuable time at the crease instead.
That looks sarcastic when written down but I actually mean it. I’m thrilled that they played a part in us avoiding defeat like they did.
Not a test that Taylor or Nicholls will remember fondly, one or both need to seriously pull finger next time round. KW will be frustrated with his efforts too, some ammo for the bobs and vagene crowd who point out his record in India isn’t flash.
Roll on the next test, Wags in for……….one of the spinners, dunno who. If Jamieson and Southee fire again then Wags can surely only add to the perils for India.
The guts to see off a bowling unit of that calibre was most impressive. Excellent gutsy work there fellas.
-
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
Roll on the next test, Wags in for……….one of the spinners, dunno who. If Jamieson and Southee fire again then Wags can surely only add to the perils for India.
Patel was the most used of the spinners wasn't he? Also the only one to get wickets and the most expensive.
However going back to relying on our quicks to take wickets we could well afford Sommerville and Ravindra to pad out overs, provide options and backstop the batting. -
@crucial said in NZ tour of India:
@mn5 said in NZ tour of India:
Roll on the next test, Wags in for……….one of the spinners, dunno who. If Jamieson and Southee fire again then Wags can surely only add to the perils for India.
Patel was the most used of the spinners wasn't he? Also the only one to get wickets and the most expensive.
However going back to relying on our quicks to take wickets we could well afford Sommerville and Ravindra to pad out overs, provide options and backstop the batting.Wags can do that, he’s a stubborn prick with the bat although those two appear to have more credentials than he does. Like I said I was impressed they pulled finger but neither of them getting a single wicket is a bit alarming when he’s waiting in the wings.
-
@canes4life said in NZ tour of India:
@rotated said in NZ tour of India:
@donsteppa said in NZ tour of India:
That's the best 18* that Ravindra may ever score...
If he has got mettle like that he may well make many more runs for NZ.
We wasn't named in part for Rahul Dravid for nothing.
Rachin is a product of my old school and was seen as a bit of a prodigy when he was dominating at that level a few years ago.
It's awesome to see him come through the levels and survive that barrage last night in his first test. The kid is probably more suited to the top order but he will relish any opportunity at this point. He could become a real gold nugget for us if his bowling can match his batting.
Get him in the side if he is good enough. Later he can start in middle order in place of Nicholls or Ross. Gives him time to grow before longterm move to 3 or 4. If he is good enough of course
-
-
@canefan said in NZ tour of India:
@canes4life said in NZ tour of India:
@rotated said in NZ tour of India:
@donsteppa said in NZ tour of India:
That's the best 18* that Ravindra may ever score...
If he has got mettle like that he may well make many more runs for NZ.
We wasn't named in part for Rahul Dravid for nothing.
Rachin is a product of my old school and was seen as a bit of a prodigy when he was dominating at that level a few years ago.
It's awesome to see him come through the levels and survive that barrage last night in his first test. The kid is probably more suited to the top order but he will relish any opportunity at this point. He could become a real gold nugget for us if his bowling can match his batting.
Get him in the side if he is good enough. Later he can start in middle order in place of Nicholls or Ross. Gives him time to grow before longterm move to 3 or 4. If he is good enough of course
A first class batting average of 38 is pretty promising with room for improvement…….but fuck me, a bowling average of 58 ?!?!?! I’m surprised the cricket stats nerd in me missed that until now.
Let’s hope he does a Steve Smith and starts at the bottom before moving up the order and dominating
-
@bovidae said in NZ tour of India:
If you want balance in the bowling attack then Patel is the spinner who should miss out to Wags. Ravindra can provide the left-arm spin option.
That’s what I meant too. I wasn’t suggesting that Wags was left out. Rather that Patel gave his spot to Wags which strengthens the batting depth should we find ourselves batting last on a minefield again.
Wags should easily take the wickets that Patel did and I like the idea of batsmen having to adjust between overs from spin to barrage more than we could do in this last test. -
@crucial said in NZ tour of India:
@bovidae said in NZ tour of India:
If you want balance in the bowling attack then Patel is the spinner who should miss out to Wags. Ravindra can provide the left-arm spin option.
That’s what I meant too. I wasn’t suggesting that Wags was left out. Rather that Patel gave his spot to Wags which strengthens the batting depth should we find ourselves batting last on a minefield again.
Wags should easily take the wickets that Patel did and I like the idea of batsmen having to adjust between overs from spin to barrage more than we could do in this last test.Hmmmm, by this thinking does Johns son get a look in though ? Got the runs on the board at test level…..but not a spinner…..
-
@crucial said in NZ tour of India:
@bovidae said in NZ tour of India:
If you want balance in the bowling attack then Patel is the spinner who should miss out to Wags. Ravindra can provide the left-arm spin option.
That’s what I meant too. I wasn’t suggesting that Wags was left out. Rather that Patel gave his spot to Wags which strengthens the batting depth should we find ourselves batting last on a minefield again.
Wags should easily take the wickets that Patel did and I like the idea of batsmen having to adjust between overs from spin to barrage more than we could do in this last test.The Indians are scared of the angry man. Good to keep them on edge, and his bowling is more nuanced these days than simply battering them
-
Interesting from cricinfo
Since the start of 2013, India have won 19 tosses in Tests at home. Apart from the two weather-affected draws, they have won 16 matches, and only one by fewer than 100 runs. This Kanpur draw in the 19th is arguably the best performance by a side against arguably the biggest challenge in Test cricket today: to face India in India and lose the toss. It is hard enough to face India in India, but once they get the first use of the pitch, it is a nightmare, which shows in these numbers.
