Auckland v Canterbury
-
-
@george33 said in Auckland v Canterbury:
Willie lose said during game ekuasi was 1.9metres so 6ft .3 so that pretty tall he only 19
It would be interesting to see an accurate height for Ekuasi. I've seen him listed as 1.83 m which looked about right for me compared to other players in his team.
Lose's facts are usually wrong.
-
-
@cgrant said in Auckland v Canterbury:
@george33 said in Auckland v Canterbury:
Willie lose said during game ekuasi was 1.9metres so 6ft .3 so that pretty tall he only 19
1,90 m is not very tall for a Nr. 8, just adequate.
He ain't finished growing yet, by all means write him off at 19. Meanwhile, Canterbury fans are comparing some kid to McCaw....
-
@kirwan said in Auckland v Canterbury:
@cgrant said in Auckland v Canterbury:
@george33 said in Auckland v Canterbury:
Willie lose said during game ekuasi was 1.9metres so 6ft .3 so that pretty tall he only 19
1,90 m is not very tall for a Nr. 8, just adequate.
He ain't finished growing yet, by all means write him off at 19. Meanwhile, Canterbury fans are comparing some kid to McCaw....
Tender Auckland spot hit there.
-
@chris said in Auckland v Canterbury:
@kirwan said in Auckland v Canterbury:
@cgrant said in Auckland v Canterbury:
@george33 said in Auckland v Canterbury:
Willie lose said during game ekuasi was 1.9metres so 6ft .3 so that pretty tall he only 19
1,90 m is not very tall for a Nr. 8, just adequate.
He ain't finished growing yet, by all means write him off at 19. Meanwhile, Canterbury fans are comparing some kid to McCaw....
Tender Auckland spot hit there.
Nope, pretty comfy over here on this side of the result
Just pointing out some hilarious double standards going on in this thread. Also worth pointing out that Jacobson is 1.91 and Read 1.93. 1.90 at 19 puts him in pretty good company.
-
-
@kiwimurph said in Auckland v Canterbury:
That must explain why Ardie is the AB number 8 - his renowned towering height.
1.88 according Mr Google (cough, cough bullshit). 2cm below adequate.
