Auckland v Canterbury

[Chris]

@akan004 said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@cgrant said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@akan004
He is rather big for an openside. But not as big as Dalton Papalii though. It looks like he has the same size as Richie McCaw in his early twenties.

Isn't he a no 8?

Kellow is a 7

[akan004]

@chris said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@akan004 said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@cgrant said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@akan004
He is rather big for an openside. But not as big as Dalton Papalii though. It looks like he has the same size as Richie McCaw in his early twenties.

Isn't he a no 8?

Kellow is a 7

Thought we were talking about the Auckland no 8.

[Chris]

@akan004 said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@chris said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@akan004 said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@cgrant said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@akan004
He is rather big for an openside. But not as big as Dalton Papalii though. It looks like he has the same size as Richie McCaw in his early twenties.

Isn't he a no 8?

Kellow is a 7

Thought we were talking about the Auckland no 8.

And Kellow and Segner

[Stargazer]

You guys are confusing me.

You could make it easier by using a player's name instead of "he".

[george33]

Willie lose said during game ekuasi was 1.9metres so 6ft .3 so that pretty tall he only 19

[Bovidae]

@george33 said in Auckland v Canterbury:

Willie lose said during game ekuasi was 1.9metres so 6ft .3 so that pretty tall he only 19

It would be interesting to see an accurate height for Ekuasi. I've seen him listed as 1.83 m which looked about right for me compared to other players in his team.

Lose's facts are usually wrong.

[george33]

@bovidae choat and Gibson aren't tall either tho he looked alot taller than them

[cgrant]

@george33 said in Auckland v Canterbury:

Willie lose said during game ekuasi was 1.9metres so 6ft .3 so that pretty tall he only 19

1,90 m is not very tall for a Nr. 8, just adequate.

[Kirwan]

@cgrant said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@george33 said in Auckland v Canterbury:

Willie lose said during game ekuasi was 1.9metres so 6ft .3 so that pretty tall he only 19

1,90 m is not very tall for a Nr. 8, just adequate.

He ain't finished growing yet, by all means write him off at 19. Meanwhile, Canterbury fans are comparing some kid to McCaw....

[Chris]

@kirwan said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@cgrant said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@george33 said in Auckland v Canterbury:

Willie lose said during game ekuasi was 1.9metres so 6ft .3 so that pretty tall he only 19

1,90 m is not very tall for a Nr. 8, just adequate.

He ain't finished growing yet, by all means write him off at 19. Meanwhile, Canterbury fans are comparing some kid to McCaw....

Tender Auckland spot hit there.

[Kirwan]

@chris said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@kirwan said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@cgrant said in Auckland v Canterbury:

@george33 said in Auckland v Canterbury:

Willie lose said during game ekuasi was 1.9metres so 6ft .3 so that pretty tall he only 19

1,90 m is not very tall for a Nr. 8, just adequate.

He ain't finished growing yet, by all means write him off at 19. Meanwhile, Canterbury fans are comparing some kid to McCaw....

Tender Auckland spot hit there.

Nope, pretty comfy over here on this side of the result

Just pointing out some hilarious double standards going on in this thread. Also worth pointing out that Jacobson is 1.91 and Read 1.93. 1.90 at 19 puts him in pretty good company.

[KiwiMurph]

That must explain why Ardie is the AB number 8 - his renowned towering height.

[Kirwan]

@kiwimurph said in Auckland v Canterbury:

That must explain why Ardie is the AB number 8 - his renowned towering height.

1.88 according Mr Google (cough, cough bullshit). 2cm below adequate.