Article: The Original Rugby Championship - Six Nations 2016

MN5

Now that BOD has retired I think I'm ready for Ireland to be my second team again. Go the Celts!!!

mariner4life

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="KiwiMurph" data-cid="554463" data-time="1453866911">
<div>
For Aus I think it's on Bein Sports this year which is instead of Setanta I think?
</div>
</blockquote>
well, i guess I'm not watching it this year either. 
 
I think there are terribly timed replays on ESPN

Virgil

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="554456" data-time="1453864568">
<div>
C'mon Scotland, THIS is the year!!!!!
</div>
</blockquote>
 
To win a game?

MN5

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Virgil" data-cid="554469" data-time="1453867604">
To win a game?</blockquote> 
To win all their games, they're gonna do the Grand Slam, you read it here first.

Billy Tell

Looking very forward to this. I know the quality is not always as good as the 4N, but the centuries-old rivalries between the countries etc give it something extra. However, I think from a rugby point of view also an interesting tournament this year
 
?Can Scotland actually achieve something (which basically means finishing 4th or better for them, doing more than beating Italy, winning more than 1 game)
?How will France and England do under new coaches
?How good a coach is Schmidt really - he has lost his stalwart O'Connell, has a number of injuries, and the RWC fell apart vs Argentina
 
As always, every team (perhaps with the exception of Italy) has at least 1 Kiwi in their ranks, so a little of the local feel there too.

Disgusted of TW

England 23-man squad v Scotland
 
M Brown (Harlequins), A Goode (Saracens), J Nowell (Exeter Chiefs), A Watson (Bath), J Joseph (Bath), O Devoto (Bath), O Farrell (Saracens), G Ford (Bath), D Care (Harlequins), B Youngs (Leicester), J George (Saracens), D Hartley (Northampton, captain), J Marler (Harlequins), M Vunipola (Saracens), D Cole (Leicester), P Hill (Northampton), G Kruis (Saracens), J Launchbury (Wasps), C Lawes (Northampton), C Robshaw (Harlequins), J Haskell (Wasps), J Clifford (Harlequins), B Vunipola (Saracens).
 
Players released J Beaumont (Sale Sharks), L Cowan-Dickie (Exeter Chiefs), M Itoje (Saracens), M Kvesic (Gloucester), M Mullan (Wasps), H Thomas (Bath), E Daly (Wasps), S Hill (Exeter Chiefs), S Rokoduguni (Bath), M Yarde (Harlequins).

booboo

"Principality Stadium"? Since when? 
Will try and follow, but likely won't too closely, old age and family tend to restrict my rugby watching nowadays. But am interested this far out in potential 2017 Lions. So it's piqued my interest a touch more than normal.

booboo

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="KiwiMurph" data-cid="554463" data-time="1453866911">
For Aus I think it's on Bein Sports this year which is instead of Setanta I think?</blockquote>
 
Well that's another reason I won't watch it.

Catogrande

Looking at that England squad, we'd better wrap Jospeh up in cotton wool as he's the only 13 option. We have four blokes covering 10+12 (Ford, Farrell, Devoto and Goode), Three covering 15 (Brown, Watson and Goode). Four covering 11/14 (Nowell (injured), Watson, Brown and Joseph), but if Joseph goes down we're bollocked. I would have liked to see Daly there instead of either Goode or Devoto, purely for a what if scenario if nothing else.
 
Eddy for all his talk about an out and out 7 has ditched the only out and out 7 in the squad - very disappointing as it seems to point to more attritional play. So in the back row we have three 6s and an 8 plus Lawes who can cover 6 at a pinch. I get that Eddy thinks we can turn Clifford into a 7 but that doesn't happen overnight.
 
I have to say I'm slightly underwhelmed.

SimonAdd

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">
Looking at that England squad, we'd better wrap Jospeh up in cotton wool as he's the only 13 option. We have four blokes covering 10+12 (Ford, Farrell, Devoto and Goode), Three covering 15 (Brown, Watson and Goode). Four covering 11/14 (Nowell (injured), Watson, Brown and Joseph), but if Joseph goes down we're bollocked. I would have liked to see Daly there instead of either Goode or Devoto, purely for a what if scenario if nothing else. 
Eddy for all his talk about an out and out 7 has ditched the only out and out 7 in the squad - very disappointing as it seems to point to more attritional play. So in the back row we have three 6s and an 8 plus Lawes who can cover 6 at a pinch. I get that Eddy thinks we can turn Clifford into a 7 but that doesn't happen overnight. 
I have to say I'm slightly underwhelmed.</blockquote>Agreed. I know there's more to openside play than just jackaling, but given what happened against Australia in the world cup you would have though it would be an issue Eddie would address more boldly. 
Kvesic leads the premiership with 15 steals in 12 games played. Haskell and Robshaw have 4, Clifford 3.

Catogrande

Simon, did you read Austin Healey's interview re the selections? Echo's what we're thinking. Writing in the Torygraph:-
 
I really wanted to be excited by his first squad, but, like many, I have been left underwhelmed. These things take time of course, but I thought Eddie would go for it from the off.
<blockquote>
I would rather lose at Murrayfield seeing new blood, new style and a new-looking team than the same old safe options.
</blockquote>
Indeed he was quick to point out that many of the issues that dogged Stuart Lancaster at both inside centre and the back row remain.
<blockquote>
The overall balance of the midfield also looks wrong to me if they go with the George Ford and Owen Farrell combination. We have seen them play together before and it did not workâ€¦
If they go with Chris Robshaw, Haskell and Billy Vunipola where is your third line-out jumper?
Haskell can barely jump, you would need a couple of forklifts to get Vunipola off the ground and, while Robshaw can be lifted, he is not going to get that high.
<div> </div>
</blockquote>

antipodean

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="555291" data-time="1454146176">
<div>
 
If they go with Chris Robshaw, Haskell and Billy Vunipola where is your third line-out jumper?
 
Haskell can barely jump, you would need a couple of forklifts to get Vunipola off the ground and, while Robshaw can be lifted, he is not going to get that high.
<div> </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
 
That looks like the Wallabies, but slow. Horribly unbalanced and giving away at other key facets of the game.
 
Dare I say it, his coaching career was made on the back of players like Finegan, Gregan, Larkham, Mortlock, George Smith and Joe Roff. Certainly not a bad coterie to base a gameplan around.

SimonAdd

I'm hoping that Eddie is just going with experience as a stopgap while he gets to know the players and brings the young blood through. 
But I can't help feeling that Itoje and Kvesic would be a better-balanced and more dynamic partnership on the flanks than Haskell and Robshaw, Devoto is a more varied 12 who would make more room for his outsides than Farrell, and George is a better ball-carrier with a more established set-piece partnership with Vunipola and Kruis than Hartley.

SimonAdd

Having said all that, I think Healey is a bit off the mark with the lineout. Robshaw and Haskell are decent enough jumpers - not true specialists like Croft, Wood or Itoje, but they'll do a job.

SimonAdd

Itoje having a stormer of a second half for Saracens vs Bath. Playing at lock but at 195cm and mobile with it, he looks like a blindside to me. Great carrying, big tackling, enormous work rate, 10 turnovers won this season and an genuine lineout option. Eddie has to look at him vs Italy, surely?

MiketheSnow

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="554476" data-time="1453870632">
<div>
To win all their games, they're gonna do the Grand Slam, you read it here first.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Ha ha

Derm McCrum

Keeping this updated as Round 1 draws near.
 
Ireland squad for first two rounds against Wales (h) and France (a) was named. Rory Best appointed by Schmidt as captain, following O'Connell's retirement from test rugby.
 
Schmidt has included four uncapped players in the squad for the first two rounds - Ulster's Stuart McCloskey (12), Connacht's Ultan Dillane (lock), Munster's newly residency- qualified backrower from SA, CJ Stander, and Leinster's newbie openside, Josh van der Flier. 
 
Bowe, Henderson, Tuohy, and O'Mahony unavailable due to long-term injury. Ross, Healy and Henry are recovering from injury but not available for the first two rounds.
 
Backs (16) -
 Keith Earls (Young Munster/Munster) <strike>Luke Fitzgerald (Blackrock College/Leinster)</strike> Robbie Henshaw (Buccaneers/Connacht) Paddy Jackson (Dungannon/Ulster) David Kearney (Lansdowne/Leinster) Rob Kearney (UCD/Leinster) Ian Madigan (Blackrock College/Leinster) Kieran Marmion (Corinthians/Connacht)
 <div style="font-family:Calibri, Arial, FreeSans, sans-serif;font-size:13px;margin:0px;color:rgb(62,62,62);">
<div style="font-family:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-style:inherit;margin:0px;"> </div>
</div>
Luke Marshall (Ballymena/Ulster) Stuart McCloskey (Ballynahinch/Ulster) * Conor Murray (Garryowen/Munster) Jared Payne (Ulster) Eoin Reddan (Lansdowne/Leinster) Jonathan Sexton (St. Mary's College/Leinster) Andrew Trimble (Ballymena/Ulster) Simon Zebo (Cork Constitution/Munster) Forwards (19) - Finlay Balham (Connacht) 
Rory Best (Banbridge/Ulster) (capt) Sean Cronin (St. Mary's College/Leinster) James Cronin (Dolphin/Munster) Ultan Dillane (Corinthians/Connacht) Tadhg Furlong (Clontarf/Leinster) Jamie Heaslip (Dublin University/Leinster) (vice-capt) Rob Herring (Ballynahinch/Ulster) Mike McCarthy (Lansdowne/Leinster) Jack McGrath (St. Mary's College/Leinster) <strike>Martin Moore (Lansdowne/Leinster)</strike> Sean O'Brien (UCD/Leinster) Tommy O'Donnell (UL Bohemians/Munster) Rhys Ruddock (St. Mary's College/Leinster) Donnacha Ryan (Shannon/Munster) CJ Stander (Munster) * Richardt Strauss (Old Wesley/Leinster) Devin Toner (Lansdowne/Leinster) Josh van der Flier (UCD/Leinster) * Nathan White (Connacht)

MiketheSnow

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MN5" data-cid="554476" data-time="1453870632">
<div>
To win all their games, they're gonna do the Grand Slam, you read it here first.
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Don't normally agree with Barnes, but spot on here
 
<a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/sport/rugbyunion/article4679276.ece'>http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/sport/rugbyunion/article4679276.ece</a>
 
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote">

Scotland favourites? Leave it out Eddie Jones, no oneâ€™s fooled

<div>
<div>Stuart Barnes</div>
<div>Published at 12:01AM, February 1 2016</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
The honeymoon is over for Eddie Jones. Itâ€™s time to take issue with the crazy comments that the roguish Australian with the winning smile has been making in the build up to Saturdayâ€™s Calcutta Cup match. Scotland, contrary to what Jones says, are not favourites. Nor should they be.
 
The bookmakers make England 9-4 to win the game. Four pounds back for every nine you invest if you back England at these prohibitive odds. There is a reason for the odds. Scotland have lost their past six games against England. They have drawn one and lost seven of the past eight. Scotland do not often beat England.
 
In fact Scotland do not win many RBS Six Nations games. In the 2011-15 World Cup cycle Scotland won three of their 20 fixtures. Favourites? You must be joking, Eddie. And there is quite a contrast with Englandâ€™s Six Nations record where Jones likes to talk about England being rated fourth in recent times. In the immediate past â€” the Stuart Lancaster era â€” England won 16 out of 20 games. Why else are Scotland favourites? The answer is, of course, the World Cup. Englandâ€™s head coach correctly points out that Scotland made it out of the pool stage whereas England did not. He does not remind people that Englandâ€™s pool had Wales and Australia swimming around shark-like in the deep end.
 
Scotland lost 34-16 to South Africa, the one top-tier team and scraped through after beating Samoa 36-33 in their final pool match. These are neither results nor performances to merit favouritism for Scotland. To nail his claim, Jones plays the narrowness of the quarter-final defeat by Australia as his trump. After all, they smashed England only a fortnight earlier didnâ€™t they?
 
Australia were superb that day against England. They toughed out victory against Wales then found it impossible to maintain their standards in a quarter-final they expected to win. Of Scotlandâ€™s three tries, one was a charge down, another an intercept. There was no David Pocock either and in the World Cup, Australia without Pocock were an altogether weaker team. That is not to denigrate the undoubted improvement in the quality of Scottish performances, but it is to gently remind English fans that Jones should not be allowed to get hold of reality and spin it until the facts fall over in a dizzy, distorted heap.
 
Vern Cotter, Scotlandâ€™s coach, is the strong, silent Kiwi type and prefers action to words but even he made the point that Jones was clearly trying to lift the psychological pressure from himself. We were treated to Jones explaining how his team had only six training sessions together (the stability of Scotland was the silent given). He went as far as to describe the pressure on Scotland to perform as â€œenormousâ€. â€œThe bookies might have us as favourites but Scotland has to be.â€ What a load of nonsense.
 
Even if England opt for the most radical changes and suddenly announce half a dozen debutants, England would shade favouritism in Edinburgh. The gulf in size between these rugby nations is vast. Scotland have two professional clubs, while England have 12 in the top flight alone and you may have noticed that the English clubs are playing some pretty decent rugby while Glasgow Warriors, the Guinness PRO12 champions, are struggling.
 
The club/country performance is no guarantee of international excellence; consider the disparity between Wales as a European rugby force, but a higher tempo English club game cannot but help the national side. In Lancasterâ€™s four years he never went into a Six Nations with the clubs in such vibrant form.
 
Lancaster lost his job for failing to escape the World Cup pool stage. Selection crumbled under pressure and Ian Ritchie, the RFU chief executive, went to the vastly experienced Jones to ensure that this wouldnâ€™t happen again. So the argument that England failed to make the last eight is irrelevant because the prime reason for the failure has been removed. If the Australian cannot win where Lancaster did time and again, there had better be a good explanation.
 
The early excuses cut no ice. The likelihood of just about the most experienced selection possible from the initial squad of 33 makes the explanation of the brevity of time together fallacious at best. There is a new management and time will be taken for understanding to take hold; fair enough.
 
But Jones seems to have countered this by going for a squad of players whose prime asset is a back catalogue of Six Nations success. England may not have won the tournament under Lancaster but they won plenty of European games. Jones was surely not signed to replicate these feats.
 
If he has a late change of mind and sticks Maro Itoje, Jack Clifford and Elliot Daly into the starting XV, you could argue that the nature of the English performance in Edinburgh would need to be assessed on the quality of the performance as much as the result (although England would remain favourites whatever the starting selection).
 
If, as seems inevitable, Jones sticks the old Six Nations combinations back together, victory is a must. If Englandâ€™s set piece is strong, their defence rock solid and the attacking game shows signs of invention, a first win would earn praise. But if they scramble to victory, well, that wouldnâ€™t be so different to the previous regimeâ€™s first game. Jones, we presume, has not been signed for purposes of continuity.
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>

gollum

<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="SimonAdd" data-cid="555314" data-time="1454172214">
<div>
Itoje having a stormer of a second half for Saracens vs Bath. Playing at lock but at 195cm and mobile with it, he looks like a blindside to me. Great carrying, big tackling, enormous work rate, 10 turnovers won this season and an genuine lineout option. Eddie has to look at him vs Italy, surely?
</div>
</blockquote>
 
Yeah, I'm assuming Daly, Itoje, maybe Ksvic etc will all get a shot there. I can see why he's not used them first up, the Scotland match is huge profile so thats a massive amount of presure for young guys.
 
He is going to need to convert a couple of locks you'd assume as Launchberry is outstanding so nailed on for years, Kruis has been playing fantastically so he's in. And Ioje is a future superstar. And then there's Lawes. Both Itoje & Lawes look like they could play blindside or even 8 in Itoje's case. And carry a few more KGs

Catogrande

Lawes has been tried at blindside a few times and he hasn't really got it. He's too tall at about 6'7" and just not mobile/dynamic enough. For sure he's pretty dynamic for a lock but gets exposed in the back row. Takes too long to get down on the deck and too long to get back up again. Also, not sure he has the rugby nous to play there. itoje is different, he's a bit smaller at around 6'4" and has a lot more experience at 6. You're right though that they could both easily add a few kgs without losing their effectiveness. Itoje as an 8 could well work. After all we've got more than enough 6s thanks very much.

The Silver Fern

Article: The Original Rugby Championship - Six Nations 2016