Wallabies vs France 1
-
-
@akan004 said in Wallabies vs France 1:
The initial error from the French was to not go for a much further kick to touch after they got the penalty at the end. Far less pressure trying to close out a game in your opposition half than in your own. Dumb play.
Yep, that was an atrocious kick for touch. Worse than most penalty kicks for touch in League, and that's saying something...
-
@antipodean said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@derpus said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.
Can only play what's there.
My point was the Wallabies required an act of self sabotage from a fifth choice halfback and a fullback from ProD2.
Just nice that another team decided to self-sabotage against us, rather than the flipside which happens far more frequently.
-
Typical first game of the season feel to this game. Thought the Wallabies were surprised by the physical nature of the French but also liked the way the Wallabies attempted to chug it up the middle to try and create space out wide (hope Foster was watching). Is this part of Rennie's plan?
Slipper is my favourite Wob. One of the best props who never takes a step backwards. -
@nepia said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@kiwimurph said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@nepia he said the gamble part was Tate McDermott the replacement 9 running down the sideline - not the lock.
Ah right, I muddled up the names while watching the vid - I thought the giant lock was McDermott and the halfback had some bogan name like Marshall or Cowan.
But, I agree with @antipodean that still, what part of it is a gamble?
I did too! I thought he said McDermott was 6 foot nine! Maybe he said 5 foot 9 (that would be closer).
-
@mikey07 said in Wallabies vs France 1:
I went to bed at halftime how did France butcher that winning position.
i think they really did tire, weren't so good defensively out wide and the collective Wallabies bench did good for once (how often does that happen?)
Strange game in the end though. The practical, determined, dominant France that started was not the France that ended. -
@barbarian said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@antipodean said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@derpus said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@antipodean And it Latu, Arnold, Skelton, Kerevi, JOC etc were in the team we would've fucking steamrolled them.
Can only play what's there.
My point was the Wallabies required an act of self sabotage from a fifth choice halfback and a fullback from ProD2.
Just nice that another team decided to self-sabotage against us, rather than the flipside which happens far more frequently.
I think the real positives are the backrow combination looks willing and balanced. And ample evidence that Test rugby really is beyond Banks and Gordon.
-
@kiwimurph I don't get the "Main Channel" argument - GEM is serving HD content into basically everywhere and SD if you live in the sticks.
Maybe because I just watch streaming via Stan
-
-
@kiwimurph said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@nta I know some Foxtel set ups you can't get Gem directly and you have to watch through app - it's certainly more difficult to watch Gem than 9 - even if only slightly.
Oh right - I'd forgotten about the Fox thing.
I've seen a few boomers
complain about it on other sites because apparently tuning in Digital TV is difficult. -
Aussie jersey colour looks out of the NFJ era. More orange than yellow.
-
@billy-tell said in Wallabies vs France 1:
Aussie jersey colour looks out of the NFJ era. More orange than yellow.
-
@nta said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@kiwimurph said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@nta I know some Foxtel set ups you can't get Gem directly and you have to watch through app - it's certainly more difficult to watch Gem than 9 - even if only slightly.
Oh right - I'd forgotten about the Fox thing.
I've seen a few boomers
complain about it on other sites because apparently tuning in Digital TV is difficult.Much easier to stumble on the game and watch it if it's on 9 than Gem.
-
@nostrildamus said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@mikey07 said in Wallabies vs France 1:
I went to bed at halftime how did France butcher that winning position.
i think they really did tire, weren't so good defensively out wide and the collective Wallabies bench did good for once (how often does that happen?)
Strange game in the end though. The practical, determined, dominant France that started was not the France that ended.It was France B (or C) which started the game. The substitutes were of level "France D" (France E or F as far the props are concerned with a ProD2 LHP and a THP who is not even the regular starter in his club).
-
@machpants said in Wallabies vs France 1:
Celebrating the mighty Wallabies win!
Given NZ is listed as a state in the Australian constitution (still), I think we can share some of that celebration!
#6.
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
ul.constitution-contents { counter-reset: constitution-number; margin: 0 0 1em; padding: 0; } ul.constitution-contents > li { margin: 0 0 1em; } ul.constitution-contents, ul.constitution-contents ul, li.chapter ol { list-style: none; } li.chapter ol > li { margin: 0 0 0
The States shall mean such of the colonies of New South Wales, New Zealand, Queensland, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia, and South Australia, including the northern territory of South Australia, as for the time being are parts of the Commonwealth, and such colonies or territories as may be admitted into or established by the Commonwealth as States; and each of such parts of the Commonwealth shall be called a State. -
@nostrildamus said in Wallabies vs France 1:
@machpants said in Wallabies vs France 1:
Celebrating the mighty Wallabies win!
Given NZ is listed as a state in the Australian constitution (still), I think we can share some of that celebration!
#6.
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
ul.constitution-contents { counter-reset: constitution-number; margin: 0 0 1em; padding: 0; } ul.constitution-contents > li { margin: 0 0 1em; } ul.constitution-contents, ul.constitution-contents ul, li.chapter ol { list-style: none; } li.chapter ol > li { margin: 0 0 0
The States shall mean such of the colonies of New South Wales, New Zealand, Queensland, Tasmania, Victoria, Western Australia, and South Australia, including the northern territory of South Australia, as for the time being are parts of the Commonwealth, and such colonies or territories as may be admitted into or established by the Commonwealth as States; and each of such parts of the Commonwealth shall be called a State.West Island makes more sense.
Just watching a few highlights, the French midfield were very good defensively, but offered very little in attack. The French 10 was standing deeper than what Matt Giteau used to when he played 10 for the Caramilk Wallabies. Starting halfback for the French was very good. They could’ve done with him to close the match.
-
@act-crusader
Couilloud is ranked Nr.3 in France, behind Dupont and Serin.
Irribaren, who replaced him during the later stages, is not even the fourth best halfback in the country. Machenaud and Lucu (and Kockott and Parra, but these two are not in contention for Les Bleus) are rated higher than him.
