SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues
-
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@steven-harris said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 problem is , they have field position, 2 scoring chances and a missed penalty..opportunities taken (0)
That one was them being stupid by not working around the ruck, pick n go’s are stupid against the Saders.
Exactly. Problem is Blues backs are bad.
-
Caleb looked very indecisive there and then went in too upright.
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@steven-harris said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 problem is , they have field position, 2 scoring chances and a missed penalty..opportunities taken (0)
That one was them being stupid by not working around the ruck, pick n go’s are stupid against the Saders.
Exactly. Problem is Blues backs are bad.
Yeah it’s as if they don’t want to get it out to them.
-
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@steven-harris said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 problem is , they have field position, 2 scoring chances and a missed penalty..opportunities taken (0)
That one was them being stupid by not working around the ruck, pick n go’s are stupid against the Saders.
Exactly. Problem is Blues backs are bad.
It’s pretty strange, the space is one out with the inside option. Putting big runners off Black with An inside option would give the backs a bit more of a chance.
WTF was that Perofeta?
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta never has his position under threat.
Great.....
The fact they havent played Sullivan shows that the coaching at the Blues is still not quite right
-
Game over ..!
-
Blues back line is a group of guys looking to create something for themselves rather than working together
-
Blackadder is having a big game.
-
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta never has his position under threat.
Great.....
The fact they havent played Sullivan shows that the coaching at the Blues is still not quite right
Exactly.
Him or Kneepkens have not seen 1 minute....
-
@mattasaurus said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Blues back line is a group of guys looking to create something for themselves rather than working together
Exactly. Power players with not enough creative links in the mix.
-
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta never has his position under threat.
Great.....
The fact they havent played Sullivan shows that the coaching at the Blues is still not quite right
Exactly.
Him or Kneepkens have not seen 1 minute....
God, I forgot they have that guy. Why the fuck havent they given him a chance.
-
@machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
A player must not tackle an opponent who is not in possession of the ball.
Sanction: Penalty
The whole dangerous play section says penalty. Once that penalty is decided you decide if it warrants more.
To me that was a prime example of why tackles without the ball are considered dangerous. Plus the player was injured to the point that they couldn’t continue.
Deserved more than a penalty IMO -
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta never has his position under threat.
Great.....
The fact they havent played Sullivan shows that the coaching at the Blues is still not quite right
Exactly.
Him or Kneepkens have not seen 1 minute....
God, I forgot they have that guy. Why the fuck havent they given him a chance.
It's maddening.
