SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues
-
Game over ..!
-
Blues back line is a group of guys looking to create something for themselves rather than working together
-
Blackadder is having a big game.
-
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta never has his position under threat.
Great.....
The fact they havent played Sullivan shows that the coaching at the Blues is still not quite right
Exactly.
Him or Kneepkens have not seen 1 minute....
-
@mattasaurus said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Blues back line is a group of guys looking to create something for themselves rather than working together
Exactly. Power players with not enough creative links in the mix.
-
-
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta never has his position under threat.
Great.....
The fact they havent played Sullivan shows that the coaching at the Blues is still not quite right
Exactly.
Him or Kneepkens have not seen 1 minute....
God, I forgot they have that guy. Why the fuck havent they given him a chance.
-
@machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
A player must not tackle an opponent who is not in possession of the ball.
Sanction: Penalty
The whole dangerous play section says penalty. Once that penalty is decided you decide if it warrants more.
To me that was a prime example of why tackles without the ball are considered dangerous. Plus the player was injured to the point that they couldn’t continue.
Deserved more than a penalty IMO -
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Perofeta never has his position under threat.
Great.....
The fact they havent played Sullivan shows that the coaching at the Blues is still not quite right
Exactly.
Him or Kneepkens have not seen 1 minute....
God, I forgot they have that guy. Why the fuck havent they given him a chance.
It's maddening.
-
-
@mattasaurus had a conversation with James Parsons earlier in the week , all he could talk about was the amount of breaks the Blues make and that they are creating opportunities.
I said that’s all very well , but good teams nail their opportunities, and the reason they don’t nail those opportunities goes back to poor pass technique and when to pass ..Conversation ended there
-
@machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@gt12 said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
Havili again, he’s good at 12, even if he doesn’t like it.
He's awesome, what's his preferred?
Fullback. Apparently he told Dagg that he doesn’t like the physicality at 12. He suits it though.
-
@steven-harris said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@mattasaurus had a conversation with James Parsons earlier in the week , all he could talk about was the amount of breaks the Blues make and that they are creating opportunities.
I said that’s all very well , but good teams nail their opportunities, and the reason they don’t nail those opportunities goes back to poor pass technique and when to pass ..Conversation ended there
Sounds like he is in a bubble and needs some feedback from outside.
-
@crucial said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
A player must not tackle an opponent who is not in possession of the ball.
Sanction: Penalty
The whole dangerous play section says penalty. Once that penalty is decided you decide if it warrants more.
To me that was a prime example of why tackles without the ball are considered dangerous. Plus the player was injured to the point that they couldn’t continue.
Deserved more than a penalty IMO@crucial said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
@machpants said in SRA Round 9: Crusaders v Blues:
A player must not tackle an opponent who is not in possession of the ball.
Sanction: Penalty
The whole dangerous play section says penalty. Once that penalty is decided you decide if it warrants more.
To me that was a prime example of why tackles without the ball are considered dangerous. Plus the player was injured to the point that they couldn’t continue.
Deserved more than a penalty IMOThe injury was caused by the way he landed not the contact. Penalty only for me. Unlucky though.
-
Thought Jordie would have had a shot a goal ..awh that’s right , that’s next year ..
-
