World Test Championship
-
@MN5 said in World Test Championship:
Terrific article on the Black Caps and their recent success ( although nothing fern experts like us don’t already know )
Slack Caps no more: the numbers that tell the story of a meteoric rise
Just a jaw-dropping collection of stats.
Absolutely magnificent. Still hard to believe this is reality. NZ number one in tests is just insane.
-
-
-
-
@Cyclops said in World Test Championship:
Ashwin has 6 for the match so needs 4 of the remaining 7 to get the century/10 double.
Only happened four times - the first by Botham against India!
Would be a hell of an achievement. He's already got one - just needs 3/7 ... easy eh
Test matches | All-round records | 100 runs and 10 wickets in a match | ESPNcricinfo
Find records of 100 runs and 10 wickets in a match in Test matches only on ESPNcricinfo.
-
@nzzp said in World Test Championship:
@Cyclops said in World Test Championship:
Ashwin has 6 for the match so needs 4 of the remaining 7 to get the century/10 double.
Only happened four times - the first by Botham against India!
Would be a hell of an achievement. He's already got one - just needs 3/7 ... easy eh
Test matches | All-round records | 100 runs and 10 wickets in a match | ESPNcricinfo
Find records of 100 runs and 10 wickets in a match in Test matches only on ESPNcricinfo.
Should get it unless one of the other Indian bowlers catches fire. With two days left big victory is all but assured
-
@nzzp That was some performance by Botham. Fast bowler,13 wickets in Mumbai!
-
The Root LBW decision in the last over of the day was an absolute shocker. More plumb than a plumby thing. How DRS contrived that outcome I do not know. Even Root was wearing a sheepish grin afterwards.
-
@Catogrande Early Botham was some player. Before he got fat and generally bought his wickets. All bar 2 of his 13 wickets were recognised batsmen plus England were 57-5 when he came in. Great performance.
-
@dogmeat said in World Test Championship:
@Catogrande Early Botham was some player. Before he got fat and generally bought his wickets. All bar 2 of his 13 wickets were recognised batsmen plus England were 57-5 when he came in. Great performance.
Yeah Imrans overall stats remained better so I think history will judge him the better player......but Beefy was a deadset legend from about 1977 to 1982.
Ashwin is some cricketer though, him and Jadeja are both terrific all rounders, more so than the overrated Stokes.
-
@MN5 said in World Test Championship:
@dogmeat said in World Test Championship:
@Catogrande Early Botham was some player. Before he got fat and generally bought his wickets. All bar 2 of his 13 wickets were recognised batsmen plus England were 57-5 when he came in. Great performance.
Yeah Imrans overall stats remained better so I think history will judge him the better player......but Beefy was a deadset legend from about 1977 to 1982.
highlights the issue of trying to pick all time greats. Consistency vs incredible peaks; it's the Howlett vs Caucaunibuca discussion
-
@nzzp said in World Test Championship:
@MN5 said in World Test Championship:
@dogmeat said in World Test Championship:
@Catogrande Early Botham was some player. Before he got fat and generally bought his wickets. All bar 2 of his 13 wickets were recognised batsmen plus England were 57-5 when he came in. Great performance.
Yeah Imrans overall stats remained better so I think history will judge him the better player......but Beefy was a deadset legend from about 1977 to 1982.
highlights the issue of trying to pick all time greats. Consistency vs incredible peaks; it's the Howlett vs Caucaunibuca discussion
Yeah from the sounds of it Imran either bowled OR batted well in a test but rarely both ?
