Rugby Brain Injuries
-
@nzzp said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@rotated said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
The caution with which the NZRU took McCaw's headknocks in 2004 was seen as overly cautious at the time by many - but now would probably be seen as borderline negligent.
would it? From memory, he took most of the year off didn't he?
NZ has a pretty decent record in this space - not perfect by any stretch, but we haven't seen the 'George North' situation here
The part where he came back a week or two after being carted off against the Poms. It got worse after that and then he went on a long layoff. Now I think the minimum stand down is three weeks at least - probably more for something like that. The point wasn't to bag what they did, just to show how much more caution is taken these days. Ben Smith missed the Lions decider on a suspected concussion they couldn't diagnose which turned out to be an ear infection.
At the time the only criticism was that they were too careful!
-
problem is back in the day and even more recently they just werent aware of the ongoing long term risks, even now they are learning, which is why I guess they are erring on the side of caution (in most cases)
I know someone who played to a high level, suffered numerous concussions, but at the time, usually you just played on.
Now suffering dementia, while I dont think they have directly linked it to concussion, it's pretty likely.
So while we moan about rulings to save players heads and how that seems harsh, this is the reality our sport and other sports face.
-
Interesting that Steve Thompson can't remember any of the matches, but can remember the full contact training with 100 scrums, etc. Not saying anything untoward is going on, concussion / CTE seems to have varying affects over time like dementia. Scary for the guys involved.
From a logical standpoint though, they should be going after the clubs as much as the international unions, surely? How do they decide when the most damage occured?
I wouldn't mind seeing some of the clubs stripped of millions, particularly in France.
-
@nzzp I think this has a reasonably high chance of happening. 10pm BBC news report saying legal process kicks off next week in the UK.
Also wonder how much this will subconsciously affect someone like Cane who has a history of concussion. Alix Popham is a v fit 41. He will likely be in a care home by 50.
-
If there is culpability it may lay at the door of whomever got rid of the mandatory 3-week stand down.
HIA are effective for during the match decisions but there’s no healer like time.
-
@MiketheSnow was it North who had a couple several years back and appeared he went back on after being knocked out?
-
@taniwharugby said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@MiketheSnow was it North who had a couple several years back and appeared he went back on after being knocked out?
yep, pretty sure it was Wales he was playing for.
No consequence either at the time - that's the kind of thing that can get seriously expensive.
-
@taniwharugby said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@MiketheSnow was it North who had a couple several years back and appeared he went back on after being knocked out?
2015 by the look
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/66028990/george-north-should-not-have-stayed-on-the-pitch---world-rugby -
-
@Siam said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
At one of the semis in Paris in 2007, I somehow spent a lot of time on the concourse drinking and yarning with Steve. Nice bloke and very friendly.
I bet he doesn't remember me though.😒
Too soon...?
i LOLed
-
Still very early in the process but will be very interesting to see how the case develops.
I'm obviously not an expert in English law, but two things are going to be very interesting to keep an eye on.
The first is who the defendants are going to be in the suit and in what capacity. In this case the RFU is an employer (in the case of the international players) but also has an oversight function over the clubs. So it will be interesting to see the basis of their culpability. If it is based on their failure to conduct oversight then their liability would effectively be limitless (every player in England would effectively have claim against them).
The second issue would be fault/unlawfulness of their actions (or inaction). What did they reasonably know and when. The basic test for negligence is 1 - would the reasonable man have foreseen the risk 2 would the reasonable man have taken steps to mitigate the risk and 3 did the defendant take these steps to mitigate the risks? So saying "we didn't know because we didnt care to find out" wouldnt work, but we had reason to foresee the risk would.
All of the above are of course complicated OHS legislation, but it might be very difficult to prove when the damage occurred so it is not clear if OHS legislation would even apply.
Mike's point above basically comes down to consent. Here there are questions to consider. On policy grounds is this a risk we want people (especially minors) to be able to consent to? And secondly, was the consent given fairly ie what information was available when the consent was given.
-
@taniwharugby said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@MiketheSnow was it North who had a couple several years back and appeared he went back on after being knocked out?
The best back from the ‘Tyson Fury’ dead must be George Smith.
The authorities knew better by this point.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@taniwharugby said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@MiketheSnow was it North who had a couple several years back and appeared he went back on after being knocked out?
The best back from the ‘Tyson Fury’ dead must be George Smith.
Different code i know, but Dean Lonergan wins all contests about getting knocked out and playing on
-
@canefan said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@MiketheSnow said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@taniwharugby said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@MiketheSnow was it North who had a couple several years back and appeared he went back on after being knocked out?
The best back from the ‘Tyson Fury’ dead must be George Smith.
Different code i know, but Dean Lonergan wins all contests about getting knocked out and playing on
Jesus
Both arms in the air like a rear gunner in a Lancastar bomber and then legs like Shakin' Stevens.
Letting him back on the park is criminal in retrospect.
-
@canefan surely only a matter of time before league has a similar issue?
-
@MiketheSnow said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@taniwharugby said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@MiketheSnow was it North who had a couple several years back and appeared he went back on after being knocked out?
The best back from the ‘Tyson Fury’ dead must be George Smith.
The authorities knew better by this point.
First off, what a tough nugget Smith was. Second off fuck you, whoever it was sanctioned him going back on.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@canefan said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@MiketheSnow said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@taniwharugby said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@MiketheSnow was it North who had a couple several years back and appeared he went back on after being knocked out?
The best back from the ‘Tyson Fury’ dead must be George Smith.
Different code i know, but Dean Lonergan wins all contests about getting knocked out and playing on
Jesus
Both arms in the air like a rear gunner in a Lancastar bomber and then legs like Shakin' Stevens.
Letting him back on the park is criminal in retrospect.
He apparently never remembered a minute of the game after that, in what was a famous victory for the Kiwis. I met the man in a bar years ago, he was very gracious when I asked to shake his hand....
-
@taniwharugby said in Rugby Brain Injuries:
@canefan surely only a matter of time before league has a similar issue?
Absolutely. Their historic penchant for shoulder charges must see them as a higher risk code for brain injuries
VIDEO: Throwback to a shocking moment on the Rugby field in 1991 | Rugby Onslaught
