Australia v India
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@No-Quarter said in Australia v India:
India really needed to win that toss and put some runs on the board.
Yep - they're fucked.
Good start getting Warner but they're going to have to roll Aus for under 200 if they want to be in this game.
-
Warner going early always brings a smile to my face.
-
@mariner4life said in Australia v India:
Warner going early always brings a smile to my face.
Same here but it's catch 22 for me as I do like watching him bat.
-
-
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@MN5 he's nowhere near fully fit. If Pucovski was fit he might well have missed this game.
Indeed so why is he playing then ?
-
@MN5 said in Australia v India:
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@MN5 he's nowhere near fully fit. If Pucovski was fit he might well have missed this game.
Indeed so why is he playing then ?
as a kiwi cricket fan you should know this better than most. Guys get rushed back when the pool of other options is paddling depth
-
@mariner4life said in Australia v India:
@MN5 said in Australia v India:
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@MN5 he's nowhere near fully fit. If Pucovski was fit he might well have missed this game.
Indeed so why is he playing then ?
as a kiwi cricket fan you should know this better than most. Guys get rushed back when the pool of other options is paddling depth
Historically yes but we have loads of guys banging on the door of the test team at the moment ( apparently )
-
@MN5 said in Australia v India:
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@MN5 he's nowhere near fully fit. If Pucovski was fit he might well have missed this game.
Indeed so why is he playing then ?
Because the other option is Joe Burns....
-
@Hooroo said in Australia v India:
Did I just hear that right? India have used 20 players in this test series?
Not sure if correct but looks like they are debuting 3 players in this game and another two debuted in the last two games. So 20 players definitely seems about right.
-
@LABCAT said in Australia v India:
@Hooroo said in Australia v India:
Did I just hear that right? India have used 20 players in this test series?
Not sure if correct but looks like they are debuting 3 players in this game and another two debuted in the last two games. So 20 players definitely seems about right.
Incredible to still be in this series!
-
Not supporting India per se but definitely cheering some early wickets here!
-
@No-Quarter said in Australia v India:
Not supporting India per se but definitely cheering some early wickets here!
I'm the same as they are the under-dog in this with all their players out
-
Aus in a very NZ-like position of relying on the same two guys again
-
-
@Bovidae said in Australia v India:
What result in this test helps NZ more? I thought we needed to cheer for Aust.
For Australia with 4 tests remaining (this test + 3 in South Africa)
- win 3 out of 4 against India/South Africa; or draw vs India and win 2 against South Africa
For India with 5 tests remaining (this test + 4 vs England):
- win 4 out of 5 against Australia/England; or win 3 and draw 2)
-
It's complicated but Australia lose they will go below 70% so NZ would at least be in front of them. However they potentially have a 3 test tour to SA which is not confirmed or cancelled at this stage. If they lose this test I imagine that the chance of the SA series being cancelled will decrease quite a lot.
If Australia lose this test and do go to SA we will need SA to either win 1 test or draw 2.
India is a bit more simple as their series against England is definitely scheduled to go ahead. They need another 110 points from their next games so either 3 wins/2 draws or 4 wins will see them above NZ.
I think our best chance is an Indian win in this game.
