Australia v India
-
-
@Donsteppa said in Australia v India:
Both sides this series have been guilty of winning a game, and then believing their own press for the next one.
Bingo.
I think Adelaide was such an odd result for India they could bounce back from it fairly easily.
-
-
@NTA said in Australia v India:
A small group ejected. Good. Even if it wasn't racial, the rest of the crowd is on Dickhead Notice.
Bans for all.
You want them all banned even though you don't know what they did, or even if they did it?
-
@Crazy-Horse "bans for all those found guilty"
Bloody lawyerville up in here 🙄
-
Some are calling for life bans on social media. I'd be happy with 5 years so they can be rehabilitated from stupidity.
@Crazy-Horse clause : IF FOUND GUILTY. 😉
-
@NTA said in Australia v India:
Some are calling for life bans on social media. I'd be happy with 5 years so they can be rehabilitated from stupidity.
@Crazy-Horse clause : IF FOUND GUILTY.
I am guessing they are just getting evicted at the most. It would be hard to convict them of anything. You would have to prove exactly who said what, who did what. You would need multiple witnesses prepared to give up their time for court.
-
Unless those who get accused make admissions they would probably be more likely to receive a ban. At the most I am guessing it would only need to be on the balance of probabilities to ban someone, to prosecute requires beyond a reasonable doubt and that can be pretty hard to reach.
-
@Crazy-Horse yep. I'm not in favour of prosecution - Venues NSW ban would be enough as it covers a fair few locations in and around Sydney.
-
-
-
@Rancid-Schnitzel convicts. Cant trust them. #neverforgetunderarm1981
-
-
-
@NTA said in Australia v India:
@NTA said in Australia v India:
The comments were something about how many wives Siraj had or somesuch.
*Wine - Siraj/Shiraz.
Lost in translation?
