• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

New Zealand v West Indies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
634 Posts 50 Posters 44.9k Views
New Zealand v West Indies
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #9

    @Rapido said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    I guess another factor is, with Jamieson's elevation. We probably won't play a spinner at home for next year or 2, injuries permitting, until Wagner retires. So now also 'at risk' is CdG. We could play a specialist batsman at 6, CdG's 4th seamer role no longer really required.

    I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that Stead said that it was unlikely they'd go into many tests without a spinner?

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Gunner on last edited by Rapido
    #10

    @Gunner said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Rapido said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    I guess another factor is, with Jamieson's elevation. We probably won't play a spinner at home for next year or 2, injuries permitting, until Wagner retires. So now also 'at risk' is CdG. We could play a specialist batsman at 6, CdG's 4th seamer role no longer really required.

    I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that Stead said that it was unlikely they'd go into many tests without a spinner?

    Well, they did in their last test. But I think that was only because Patel pulled up lame.

    I'm not comfortable with it. But if the 4 seamers are fit, they are un-droppable.
    I'm uncomfortable that it will makes us lions at home but pussies away (sub-continent).

    At this stage, I would read Stead's comment as a spinner in the squad.

    Really, best balance (on paper) now would be to find a spinner who can do (or almost do) CdG's role. cough, Santner, cough.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Rapido on last edited by Gunner
    #11

    @Rapido said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Gunner said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Rapido said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    I guess another factor is, with Jamieson's elevation. We probably won't play a spinner at home for next year or 2, injuries permitting, until Wagner retires. So now also 'at risk' is CdG. We could play a specialist batsman at 6, CdG's 4th seamer role no longer really required.

    I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that Stead said that it was unlikely they'd go into many tests without a spinner?

    Well, they did in their last test.

    I'm not comfortable with it. But if the 4 seamers are fit, they are un-droppable.
    I'm uncomfortable that it will makes us lions at home but pussies away (sub-continent).

    At this stage, I would read Stead's comment as a spinner in the squad.

    Really, best balance (on paper) now would be to find a spinner who can do (or almost do) CdG's role. cough, Santner, cough.

    No no no no no! At test level, he's shown he's not good enough with the bat or ball.

    I like the thinking though, finding someone capable will be the hard thing.

    Cole McConchie from Canterbury would be the only middle order bat that bowls decent spin that I can think of. Wouldn't have a clue if he's up to it, but based on averages - he goes at just under 32 with the bat and just over 32 with the ball...

    Edit - I see that McConchie is captain of the NZA team to play the Windies... lets hope he goes well.

    RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • RapidoR Offline
    RapidoR Offline
    Rapido
    replied to Gunner on last edited by Rapido
    #12

    @Gunner said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Rapido said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Gunner said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Rapido said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    I guess another factor is, with Jamieson's elevation. We probably won't play a spinner at home for next year or 2, injuries permitting, until Wagner retires. So now also 'at risk' is CdG. We could play a specialist batsman at 6, CdG's 4th seamer role no longer really required.

    I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that Stead said that it was unlikely they'd go into many tests without a spinner?

    Well, they did in their last test.

    I'm not comfortable with it. But if the 4 seamers are fit, they are un-droppable.
    I'm uncomfortable that it will makes us lions at home but pussies away (sub-continent).

    At this stage, I would read Stead's comment as a spinner in the squad.

    Really, best balance (on paper) now would be to find a spinner who can do (or almost do) CdG's role. cough, Santner, cough.

    No no no no no! At test level, he's shown he's not good enough with the bat or ball.

    I like the thinking though, finding someone capable will be the hard thing.

    Cole McConchie from Canterbury would be the only middle order bat that bowls decent spin that I can think of. Wouldn't have a clue if he's up to it, but based on averages - he goes at just under 32 with the bat and just over 32 with the ball...

    Edit - I see that McConchie is captain of the NZA team to play the Windies... lets hope he goes well.

    Yes, hence the coughs.
    McConchie will just be Santner-lite. I don't actually mind Santner if we accept his role, but his test batting worried me more than his bowling (if we're talking higher than 8 in the order, which we are if talking CdG substitue).

    To be honest. In the next covid effected year. I think just play each test as it comes. So ....

    • In NZ, except Hamilton, play no spinners.
    • If in subcontinent or UAE, have experienced players in Patel and Sommerville that have shown they won't be hopeless. Maybe even goodish.

    Then, further out than next year, options:

    • When Wagner retires, reintegrate Patel to being an all conditions spinner.
    • When CdG retires, hope we have by then someone who is good enough to bat top 6 and provide handy spin for home tests (Phillips or Ravindra). But use specialists for Asian tests.
    • Or just hope Ravindra is good enough to make top 5 soon anyway (poor start to season so far), and his spin (which was good at youth level) gets better at senior level.
    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Daryl Mitchell has been called into the test side to replace GdG.

    And Santner will captain the side in the last T20 game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    If you are like me and can't be bothered signing up to Spark Sport for this series, the 1st T20 game is live on TV1 on Friday.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Rapido on last edited by
    #15

    @Rapido said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Gunner said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Rapido said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Gunner said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Rapido said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    I guess another factor is, with Jamieson's elevation. We probably won't play a spinner at home for next year or 2, injuries permitting, until Wagner retires. So now also 'at risk' is CdG. We could play a specialist batsman at 6, CdG's 4th seamer role no longer really required.

    I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that Stead said that it was unlikely they'd go into many tests without a spinner?

    Well, they did in their last test.

    I'm not comfortable with it. But if the 4 seamers are fit, they are un-droppable.
    I'm uncomfortable that it will makes us lions at home but pussies away (sub-continent).

    At this stage, I would read Stead's comment as a spinner in the squad.

    Really, best balance (on paper) now would be to find a spinner who can do (or almost do) CdG's role. cough, Santner, cough.

    No no no no no! At test level, he's shown he's not good enough with the bat or ball.

    I like the thinking though, finding someone capable will be the hard thing.

    Cole McConchie from Canterbury would be the only middle order bat that bowls decent spin that I can think of. Wouldn't have a clue if he's up to it, but based on averages - he goes at just under 32 with the bat and just over 32 with the ball...

    Edit - I see that McConchie is captain of the NZA team to play the Windies... lets hope he goes well.

    Yes, hence the coughs.
    McConchie will just be Santner-lite. I don't actually mind Santner if we accept his role, but his test batting worried me more than his bowling (if we're talking higher than 8 in the order, which we are if talking CdG substitue).

    To be honest. In the next covid effected year. I think just play each test as it comes. So ....

    • In NZ, except Hamilton, play no spinners.
    • If in subcontinent or UAE, have experienced players in Patel and Sommerville that have shown they won't be hopeless. Maybe even goodish.

    Then, further out than next year, options:

    • When Wagner retires, reintegrate Patel to being an all conditions spinner.
    • When CdG retires, hope we have by then someone who is good enough to bat top 6 and provide handy spin for home tests (Phillips or Ravindra). But use specialists for Asian tests.
    • Or just hope Ravindra is good enough to make top 5 soon anyway (poor start to season so far), and his spin (which was good at youth level) gets better at senior level.

    Santner lite ????? Is that even humanly possible ?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    I see Rossco is 36, turning 37 at the end of this summer.

    I guess we're entering bonus territory with him now!

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Bovidae on last edited by
    #17

    @Bovidae said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    If you are like me and can't be bothered signing up to Spark Sport for this series, the 1st T20 game is live on TV1 on Friday.

    Oh I forgot the cricket was on spark now.

    How much to buy the series? Could look it up myself, but being lazy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #18

    @Chris-B said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    I see Rossco is 36, turning 37 at the end of this summer.

    I guess we're entering bonus territory with him now!

    I’d imagine Nicholls goes up a spot once the inevitable happens.

    Can anyone tell me what’s happening with Jimmy Neeshams career ?

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to MN5 on last edited by
    #19

    @MN5 said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Chris-B said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    I see Rossco is 36, turning 37 at the end of this summer.

    I guess we're entering bonus territory with him now!

    I’d imagine Nicholls goes up a spot once the inevitable happens.

    Can anyone tell me what’s happening with Jimmy Neeshams career ?

    1. If he can get back to scoring runs...
    2. No idea. Seems to be a limited overs specialist these days though doesn't he. Though he did do well when he was in the test team.
    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Gunner on last edited by MN5
    #20

    @Gunner said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @MN5 said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Chris-B said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    I see Rossco is 36, turning 37 at the end of this summer.

    I guess we're entering bonus territory with him now!

    I’d imagine Nicholls goes up a spot once the inevitable happens.

    Can anyone tell me what’s happening with Jimmy Neeshams career ?

    1. If he can get back to scoring runs...
    2. No idea. Seems to be a limited overs specialist these days though doesn't he. Though he did do well when he was in the test team.

    Seems to me Taylor retiring frees up Neesham as a potential replacement.

    Nichols is decent, he’ll be back.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    On Nicholls (and everyone else).

    I've long been an advocate that when it comes to test selecting, we should largely ignore performances against Australia.

    They pretty much invariably make the guys who didn't play seem better than they are.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Oh geez, I missed the part about Santner being called into the test squad before.

    Is Ian Foster selecting our cricket team now too?

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/black-caps/123502518/black-caps-vs-west-indies-mitchell-santner-daryl-mitchell-get-test-squad-callups-for-injured-duo

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #23

    @Gunner said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    Oh geez, I missed the part about Santner being called into the test squad before.

    Is Ian Foster selecting our cricket team now too?

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricket/black-caps/123502518/black-caps-vs-west-indies-mitchell-santner-daryl-mitchell-get-test-squad-callups-for-injured-duo

    Post of the year

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    So who sits out the first test?

    Surely be two of Young, Mitchell, Santner and Jamieson?

    nzzpN G 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #25

    @Chris-B said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    So who sits out the first test?

    Surely be two of Young, Mitchell, Santner and Jamieson?

    can't see Jamieson missing out

    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
    4
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #26

    @Chris-B surely Santner and Young.

    There can be no logical reason for picking Santner ahead of Jamieson. None. Zip. Nada.

    Chris B.C CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    I would have thought that Somerville was the obvious choice but Stead must want a left-arm orthodox.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5 Banned
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #28

    @nzzp said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    @Chris-B said in New Zealand v West Indies:

    So who sits out the first test?

    Surely be two of Young, Mitchell, Santner and Jamieson?

    can't see Jamieson missing out

    Mediocre spinner and occasionally decent batsman vs big tall scary paceman who started his career with a bang ?

    Well based on selection policy in sport this year Santner is a shoe in.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1

New Zealand v West Indies
Sports Talk
cricket
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.