The Cane vs Savea Debate
-
I prefer Cane at test level tbh. There's not as much space and things are a lot tighter at test level (obviously), hence why I feel that Cane's harder edge is more suited to the test arena. Savea's style is more suited to the more open domestic scene where he has more room to express himself and show off his skills more than Cane.
I prefer Savea as a bench option and hope we don't try and play both of the going forward. It's as if Hansen was too scared to hurt people's feelings in the public by trying to fit everyone in when it wasn't the best thing to do for the side. Hopefully this new coaching team do not make the same mistakes.
-
Cane is one of those undemonstrative players you notice most when he's not playing. He adds a hardness to the AB loose trio and his tackling and breakdown work is up there with the best there is. He's also bloody good when things aren't going well and seems to have a cool head in a crisis.
I want Ardie in the squad though and it's a hard pick between the two. Not too sure how Sam would go at 6 or 8 but would like to see Foster try and find a place for both of them in the starting lineup.
-
I didn't think that Savea played like at 7 in the North-South game.
I'm not saying he isn't a good openside but his game seems more suited to playing in the wide channels now, or using his speed off the scrum, rather than getting in those dark places at the breakdown. Savea did get that turnover near the NI line at the end of the game but that was more about desperate defending on the goal line.
-
-
@Stargazer said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
Tbh, I'm not convinced by either of them at 7; it's more that - at the moment - we're lacking a better option.
I think there are some decent options there that would do well. Not enough to force their way in if Sam and Ardie are fit but if our hand was forced I wouldn’t hesitate in giving Boshier a crack.
-
-
@Stargazer said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Crucial With "better option", I basically mean a McCaw level option. I haven't seen him, yet.
But yeah, for the future, I'd currently also look at Boshier, Papali'i and possibly Kirifi.
They don't turn up all that often.
-
It's always a funny debate. I like them both. Savea runs hard and has pace, Cane is a bit more technical and is better defensively.
I think people who watch rugby a bit more casually see Ardie run hard and think he's automatically better. I see people making the argument on Facebook all the time and if anyone disagrees they spam clown emojis and think they won the argument.
I don't think Cane has ever not played well in the black jersey, same with Ardie.
However, one thing Cane has over Ardie is his defensive work. We lack the physical presence when he isn't on the field e.g. RWC semi final.
-
@Yeetyaah Just as you claim that Cane is better on defence, you can claim Ardie is better on attack. We only lacked a certain physicality in the backrow when Ardie was playing at 7 instead of Cane, because we didn't have a hard-hitting 6. We won't miss it as much if all the promise of someone like Cullen Grace comes to fruition. Add a good no. 8, and it won't matter much.
Fingers crossed our options increase over the next few years.
-
@shark starting an anti Chiefs player thread ... who could have imagined this?
The first 20 minutes of the England semi is why Cane is Fosters captain.
TBH, I don't think Ardie was nearly as good this year as he was in the previous two years (and Cane took a while to get back up to speed) but I'd definitely include him as the impact loosie to come on and cause havoc. Essentially back to his role he performed before his form got awesome and Cane was out through head/injury.
-
Has anyone seen Ardie play well at openside this year? Can't even nail down the spot for the Hurricanes.
-
@antipodean He probably played at 8 because Evans was injured.
-
So all the support for Cane is based on how we can't be without his dominant defence. Is this first and foremost how we select our openside flankers now? Not their ability to win turnovers, their link play, and hell, their ability to simply catch a rugby ball?
-
@Stargazer said in The Cane vs Savea Debate:
@Yeetyaah Just as you claim that Cane is better on defence, you can claim Ardie is better on attack. We only lacked a certain physicality in the backrow when Ardie was playing at 7 instead of Cane, because we didn't have a hard-hitting 6. We won't miss it as much if all the promise of someone like Cullen Grace comes to fruition. Add a good no. 8, and it won't matter much.
Fingers crossed our options increase over the next few years.
Not dissing Grace, but we already have Frizell who is looking like Shag made the right selection, just a year too early.
-
@Crucial I was more thinking of the next few years. Grace is only 20 and already a hard hitter; with time, he will - hopefully - get better and even stronger. I think Frizell has been playing very well this year, so good to have them both and Grace showing a lot of promise.
-
I'm happy enough to have the extra bits savea provides if the 6 and 8 are bash brothers.
When your 6 and 8 are a journeyman lock and a guy 2 years past it, then savea becomes a luxury you can't afford.
Top level test rugby is trench warfare now. If you aren't winning collisions you are losing games. And that's both sides of the ball.
I will say that is impossible to express just how much I don't want to play both of them at the same time.
-
Also shark i get your point, but you are massively underselling cane to make it.
He's still very good on the ground, makes really fucking great reads on defence, and hits like a truck. That definitely makes a more than handy test loose forward.
