Otago v Auckland
-
Don't think it would have mattered when Hickey was blooded tbh. He lacks any sort of speed and athleticism to start at 10 in NZ rugby and stifles teams on attack in the process. I thought he'd suit European rugby more tbh.
-
@African-Monkey said in Otago v Auckland:
Don't think it would have mattered when Hickey was blooded tbh. He lacks any sort of speed and athleticism to start at 10 in NZ rugby and stifles teams on attack in the process. I thought he'd suit European rugby more tbh.
I thought Pivac was going to turn him into a halfback (he got ~20mins there in an NPC final). That probably didn't happen because there were no better options at ten back then
-
@Tim said in Otago v Auckland:
@Bones And dipshits here compare Bridge to Howlett.
You're a fucktard if you can't see the similarities.
I don't think anyone has claimed Bridge is as good as Howlett so you've completely got the wrong end of the stick given you seem to have assumed that, but there are similarities in many areas...postionally, physically, pace etc.
-
-
Calebs quads look massive in those white shorts π²
-
Surely Ruru was out in touch?
-
@nzzp said in Otago v Auckland:
Pass looked 'flat' but great line and try for AJ Lam
Marshy reckons it was fine, so means it was clearly forward.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Otago v Auckland:
@nzzp said in Otago v Auckland:
Pass looked 'flat' but great line and try for AJ Lam
Marshy reckons it was fine, so means it was clearly forward.
honeslty, looked forward in real time. Marsh is terrible.
-
@Steven-Harris said in Otago v Auckland:
@nzzp very slick, you just suspect if Auckland get in behind Otago, it could be a long afternoon for the southern boys
If our forwards get going, could be a long day out for Otago.
Edit: yes, I agree!