• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #805

    @Crucial would many of those countries WANT to set up in NZ? little to no "home" support?

    and would brand new PI or american teams be more competitive than the aussie ones?

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #806

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Crucial would many of those countries WANT to set up in NZ? little to no "home" support?

    and would brand new PI or american teams be more competitive than the aussie ones?

    Yeah we aren’t big enough to support that. And it is no bluff by Oz, they cannot, politically, afford to get rid of any of their teams. It just about tore AR apart last time. Ane now they have 5 teams again, a few good games, and some big bucks backing for one team - that’s no bluff just shit for both countries if we go it alone.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #807

    this is going to damage both Unions pretty badly.

    KiwiwombleK SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #808

    @mariner4life you think it will damage NZ? will it be much worse than previous comps?

    mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to Kiwiwomble on last edited by
    #809

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @mariner4life you think it will damage NZ? will it be much worse than previous comps?

    I mean if both teams go it alone. Australia need our quality, (sorry Aussies, it's arrogant but it's true);

    we are simply too small to do it by ourselves.

    In the end both unions either go broke, or lose too many players to big O/S contracts.

    KiwiwombleK barbarianB boobooB 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • barbarianB Online
    barbarianB Online
    barbarian
    replied to Crucial on last edited by
    #810

    @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Call their bluff I reckon.

    They have neither the player quality or money to set up an attractive product themselves that would threaten what we want to set up.

    Just to clarify this - in order to avoid having five second rate Australian teams, you will set up a comp with five third rate teams from Asia, the PIs and the Americas?

    mariner4lifeM CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
    8
  • KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble Banned
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #811

    @mariner4life oh, misunderstood

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #812

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Crucial said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Call their bluff I reckon.

    They have neither the player quality or money to set up an attractive product themselves that would threaten what we want to set up.

    Just to clarify this - in order to avoid having five second rate Australian teams, you will set up a comp with five third rate teams from Asia, the PIs and the Americas?

    god that would suuuuck

    the worst of both worlds

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by antipodean
    #813

    We know from history that a league without sufficient depth results in terrible teams getting flogged. No one watches those games, so they're a net loss.

    New Zealand doesn't have the economics to support a competition of any considerable length of time but what it does bring to the table is quality.

    Australia brings more economic opportunity, but less quality. There's no way accepting the ham-fisted ultimatum by NZR is politically viable for RA. The economic opportunity is tied directly to the competitiveness of the Australian franchises.

    It's a terrible catch-22.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • barbarianB Online
    barbarianB Online
    barbarian
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #814

    @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @mariner4life you think it will damage NZ? will it be much worse than previous comps?

    I mean if both teams go it alone. Australia need our quality, (sorry Aussies, it's arrogant but it's true);

    I'm not sure we do. I agree NZ sides are generally better (though not by as much as some here seem to think), but nobody I know has had any issues with the quality of rugby in SuperAU. Sure there's been a few stinkers, but you will get that in any competition.

    There's a world where we have 5 Aussie teams, the Fiji Drua (already involved in NRC), and one more team from Asia (Sunwolves?) and it's a pretty tidy little comp. Yeah it may not be world beating and I still prefer TT but I think it probably ends up a more solid commercial proposition than what NZ could muster. Not by a huge amount, but a little bit.

    mariner4lifeM NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #815

    @barbarian yeah righto, have fun with it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #816

    @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    this is going to damage both Unions pretty badly.

    Yep. A "few" good Aussie teams would be good. However, how the fuck is having weak teams in a competition "growing the game" in any way?

    It comes down to the very heart of rugby to me - contest. Contest for the ball is the very premise of the game. Rucks, mauls, scrums, lineouts - all about winning the ball. Don't we all hate uncontested scrums? That is what extra Aussie teams add to me. Not worth watching.

    Until Australia can prove that they have enough good players to compete with 5 teams ...which they have yet to do, they would ruin what has been a fantastic SRA.

    How much would they actually bring financially for NZR?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #817

    Whatever, let them have five but our red line is no guaranteed finals spots. Be careful what you wish for with no finals in Aussie at the pointy end of the comp.

    SnowyS WingerW sharkS 3 Replies Last reply
    10
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #818

    @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Whatever, let them have five but our red line is no guaranteed finals spots. Be careful what you wish for with no finals in Aussie at the pointy end of the comp.

    Nice.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Online
    barbarianB Online
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #819

    We had this debate about five pages ago, but man you'd think no Aussie team had won a game in years. Or even been close. I know you guys think the rugby sun shines out your arsehole, but really you aren't quite as good as you think you are.

    And you need to realise that winning isn't the main concern of RA in designing this comp. It's getting a viable commercial product that ensures local fans get good content in their home city.

    YeetyaahY SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #820

    If the answer is a competitive NRC level team and the Force, the question is shit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • YeetyaahY Online
    YeetyaahY Online
    Yeetyaah
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #821

    @barbarian viable rugby in Melbourne?????

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Online
    barbarianB Online
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #822

    Why not? They have had pretty solid support, albeit with poor results. Regularly have big crowds at Bledisloes, tests etc.

    antipodeanA mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #823

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    It's getting a viable commercial product that ensures local fans get good content in their home city.

    Loads of fans want to go a see a substandard team go and lose in their home town, aye?

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Online
    barbarianB Online
    barbarian
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #824

    @Snowy But the alternative is ending that team, and telling their fans to just go home. It's not as simple a choice as you all seem to think.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.