• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

'Super Rugby' 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.9k Posts 81 Posters 133.9k Views
'Super Rugby' 2021
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #814

    @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @Kiwiwomble said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    @mariner4life you think it will damage NZ? will it be much worse than previous comps?

    I mean if both teams go it alone. Australia need our quality, (sorry Aussies, it's arrogant but it's true);

    I'm not sure we do. I agree NZ sides are generally better (though not by as much as some here seem to think), but nobody I know has had any issues with the quality of rugby in SuperAU. Sure there's been a few stinkers, but you will get that in any competition.

    There's a world where we have 5 Aussie teams, the Fiji Drua (already involved in NRC), and one more team from Asia (Sunwolves?) and it's a pretty tidy little comp. Yeah it may not be world beating and I still prefer TT but I think it probably ends up a more solid commercial proposition than what NZ could muster. Not by a huge amount, but a little bit.

    mariner4lifeM NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #815

    @barbarian yeah righto, have fun with it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to mariner4life on last edited by
    #816

    @mariner4life said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    this is going to damage both Unions pretty badly.

    Yep. A "few" good Aussie teams would be good. However, how the fuck is having weak teams in a competition "growing the game" in any way?

    It comes down to the very heart of rugby to me - contest. Contest for the ball is the very premise of the game. Rucks, mauls, scrums, lineouts - all about winning the ball. Don't we all hate uncontested scrums? That is what extra Aussie teams add to me. Not worth watching.

    Until Australia can prove that they have enough good players to compete with 5 teams ...which they have yet to do, they would ruin what has been a fantastic SRA.

    How much would they actually bring financially for NZR?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    wrote on last edited by
    #817

    Whatever, let them have five but our red line is no guaranteed finals spots. Be careful what you wish for with no finals in Aussie at the pointy end of the comp.

    SnowyS WingerW sharkS 3 Replies Last reply
    10
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #818

    @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Whatever, let them have five but our red line is no guaranteed finals spots. Be careful what you wish for with no finals in Aussie at the pointy end of the comp.

    Nice.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #819

    We had this debate about five pages ago, but man you'd think no Aussie team had won a game in years. Or even been close. I know you guys think the rugby sun shines out your arsehole, but really you aren't quite as good as you think you are.

    And you need to realise that winning isn't the main concern of RA in designing this comp. It's getting a viable commercial product that ensures local fans get good content in their home city.

    YeetyaahY SnowyS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #820

    If the answer is a competitive NRC level team and the Force, the question is shit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #821

    @barbarian viable rugby in Melbourne?????

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    wrote on last edited by
    #822

    Why not? They have had pretty solid support, albeit with poor results. Regularly have big crowds at Bledisloes, tests etc.

    antipodeanA mariner4lifeM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #823

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    It's getting a viable commercial product that ensures local fans get good content in their home city.

    Loads of fans want to go a see a substandard team go and lose in their home town, aye?

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • barbarianB Offline
    barbarianB Offline
    barbarian
    replied to Snowy on last edited by
    #824

    @Snowy But the alternative is ending that team, and telling their fans to just go home. It's not as simple a choice as you all seem to think.

    SnowyS 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #825

    @barbarian Nobody thinks it's simple. It is just harsh reality.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #826

    Super 10 still sounds a hell of a lot better than Super 18 was.

    You don't have the issue of big travel - you'd have say 7-8 competitive teams every year competing for say 4 semi final spots.

    You don't have the issue of conferences and lopsided schedules.

    The Kiwis would watch the kiwi derbies - the Aussies would watch the aussie derbies. The good trans Ta$man games would get watched. Ok the bad games wouldn't get many viewers but how is that much different to Super 12 was?

    Sounds good.

    M KirwanK SnowyS 3 Replies Last reply
    8
  • WingerW Offline
    WingerW Offline
    Winger
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #827

    @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Whatever, let them have five but our red line is no guaranteed finals spots. Be careful what you wish for with no finals in Aussie at the pointy end of the comp.

    Aust can't even support 4 sides (financially or player quality). If they want 5 they should do it alone (it would be better for them rather than their teams being thrashed ever other week by NZ sides). NZ would be best just to step away until they come to their senses (likely after about 1 or 2 years when they are close to bankrupt)

    I would sooner watch 5 NZ sides as the main competition (but NZ need to set a financial structure up so its impossible for 1 team to win year after year) than playing 2nd rate Aussie sides. NZ should stick with the 5 sides plus a PI side. 6 sides but NZ must ensure the PI can compete

    And maybe look at some sort of pool knockout competition as well. This may include SA, Aust NZ PI Japan and maybe some Celtic league sides as well

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #828

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Why not? They have had pretty solid support, albeit with poor results. Regularly have big crowds at Bledisloes, tests etc.

    barbarianB boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #829

    @KiwiMurph Yup that’s where I’m at too. Reality for Oz and us.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    replied to barbarian on last edited by
    #830

    @barbarian said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Why not? They have had pretty solid support, albeit with poor results. Regularly have big crowds at Bledisloes, tests etc.

    don't they average less than 10k through the gate?

    Those tests are always packed with people from other states travelling because a weekend in Melbourne is awesome for the rugby. That and Melbournians will actually front for an international event.

    FWIW i am happy to keep the 5 if you really want, but you cannot pretend the comp is going to be better for it.

    You are effectively hanging your hat on one side a year being a shot. Australian supporters are not going to stand for that (they haven't in the past, why would they now?)

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • KirwanK Offline
    KirwanK Offline
    Kirwan
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #831

    @KiwiMurph said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Super 10 still sounds a hell of a lot better than Super 18 was.

    You don't have the issue of big travel - you'd have say 7-8 competitive teams every year competing for say 4 semi final spots.

    You don't have the issue of conferences and lopsided schedules.

    The Kiwis would watch the kiwi derbies - the Aussies would watch the aussie derbies. The good trans Ta$man games would get watched. Ok the bad games wouldn't get many viewers but how is that much different to Super 12 was?

    Sounds good.

    Yeah, maybe another key point is a max of 12 sides. So eventually the islands side and maybe one from Japan. But no more bloat.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • sharkS Offline
    sharkS Offline
    shark
    replied to Kirwan on last edited by
    #832

    @Kirwan said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Whatever, let them have five but our red line is no guaranteed finals spots. Be careful what you wish for with no finals in Aussie at the pointy end of the comp.

    Yep bang on. Enough with the cock measuring. Let's have on-field results determine who's right and who's wrong. But if there is ANY talk of conferences and automatic qualifiers, they can fuck off. Then come back a little bit, and fuck off a bit further.

    barbarianB 1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • SnowyS Offline
    SnowyS Offline
    Snowy
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #833

    @KiwiMurph said in 'Super Rugby' 2021:

    Super 10 still sounds a hell of a lot better than Super 18 was.

    For sure, but Australia provide the extra 2 competitive teams?

    8 teams home and away with a finals series? Or we are back to a PI and Japan add on? I doubt that they would be competitive too.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

'Super Rugby' 2021
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.