• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefsbrumbies
201 Posts 33 Posters 4.0k Views
Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4)
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastieW Offline
    westcoastie
    wrote on last edited by
    #173

    so that stuff about Aussie rugby being stuffed was pretty on the money wasn't it?

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steven Harris
    wrote on last edited by
    #174

    Which Alalaatoa brother is looking in the better shape..?,both looking very lean..

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    chchfanatic
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #175

    @Nepia he spent 1 year in the academy. Played shit for Lincoln colts in 2018.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to westcoastie on last edited by
    #176

    @westcoastie said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    so that stuff about Aussie rugby being stuffed was pretty on the money wasn't it?

    One swallow doesn't make a summer.

    BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    chchfanatic
    wrote on last edited by
    #177

    So crusaders back to favourites again.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #178

    @antipodean said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @Nepia said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @sparky said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    Been this theory going around as he was injured that a dit DMac would have made all the difference at RWC.

    This game reveals that theory to be poke.

    Yeah, let's ignore all games that DMac played (including tests) before injury and rate him on this abortion alone.

    There were gaping holes in his game when he was good. People accepted them, or at least overlooked them, because of the positive impact his attack had.

    He's been decidedly average this year and dogshit in this game. There's no upside to his play.

    Which doesn't negate the fact this game has little relevance to what he would have contributed to the RWC team if he wasn't injured.

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #179

    @NTA said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @westcoastie said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    so that stuff about Aussie rugby being stuffed was pretty on the money wasn't it?

    One swallow doesn't make a summer.

    Pretty sure you're not Aussie anymore.

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DonsteppaD Offline
    DonsteppaD Offline
    Donsteppa
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #180

    @antipodean said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @Nepia said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @sparky said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    Been this theory going around as he was injured that a dit DMac would have made all the difference at RWC.

    This game reveals that theory to be poke.

    Yeah, let's ignore all games that DMac played (including tests) before injury and rate him on this abortion alone.

    There were gaping holes in his game when he was good. People accepted them, or at least overlooked them, because of the positive impact his attack had.

    He's been decidedly average this year and dogshit in this game. There's no upside to his play.

    Defensively he’s always varied between someone who can hammer a big runner in the last line of defence, and at other times can look like a wet bus ticket attached to the end of a turnstile. A very gifted yet mercurial player.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to chchfanatic on last edited by
    #181

    @chchfanatic said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    So crusaders back to favourites again.

    Uh.... "back"?

    alt text

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #182

    Poor performance from the Chiefs tonight but they have enough quality in their squad to hit back. A bye week next week may have come at the perfect time to allow them to reset.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to Bones on last edited by
    #183

    @Bones said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @NTA said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @westcoastie said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    so that stuff about Aussie rugby being stuffed was pretty on the money wasn't it?

    One swallow doesn't make a summer.

    Pretty sure you're not Aussie anymore.

    Waratahs have been disowned, its true.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    chchfanatic
    replied to NTA on last edited by
    #184

    @NTA didn’t everyone say the chiefs were favourites after they beat us.

    NTAN Y 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #185

    @Nepia said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @antipodean said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @Nepia said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @sparky said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    Been this theory going around as he was injured that a dit DMac would have made all the difference at RWC.

    This game reveals that theory to be poke.

    Yeah, let's ignore all games that DMac played (including tests) before injury and rate him on this abortion alone.

    There were gaping holes in his game when he was good. People accepted them, or at least overlooked them, because of the positive impact his attack had.

    He's been decidedly average this year and dogshit in this game. There's no upside to his play.

    Which doesn't negate the fact this game has little relevance to what he would have contributed to the RWC team if he wasn't injured.

    Well that's an academic argument and I'd suggest Mounga was a better play maker and Beaudy a better fullback, so not much. Particularly in a game where our forwards were dominated.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to chchfanatic on last edited by
    #186

    @chchfanatic said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @NTA didn’t everyone say the chiefs were favourites after they beat us.

    Not sure. Haven't spoken to everyone 😉

    Was a good game from them. But Round 4? Yeah, nah.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #187

    TSF version of Godwin’s law:

    “As a thread grows longer, the probability of discussing the RWC failure or Akira Ioane approaches 1”

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    16
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by sparky
    #188

    Latest (UK) odds that I could find for Super Rugby champions 2020 confirm that the Chiefs are no longer the favourites for the title:

    Crusaders 7/4, Chiefs 12/5, Jaguares 9/1, Stormers 9/1, Hurricanes 10/1, Sharks 14/1, Blues 20/1, Brumbies 25/1, Reds 80/1

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    replied to Duluth on last edited by sparky
    #189

    @Duluth said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    TSF version of Godwin’s law:

    “As a thread grows longer, the probability of discussing the RWC failure or Akira Ioane approaches 1”

    Chiefs made an error not signing Akira Ioane. A new environment would have done him wonders and his driving play from Number 8 was exactly what the Chiefs missed tonight.

    RWC failure seems to haunt Sam Cane and ALB still. Neither fully imposed themselves on this game.

    NTAN ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • NTAN Offline
    NTAN Offline
    NTA
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #190

    @sparky said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    RWC failure seems to haunt Sam Cane and ALB still. Neither imposed themselves on this game.

    They didn't, but they were also let down by 13 other numpties on the park. Hard to shine when you're swimming in shit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #191

    @Stargazer said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @taniwharugby
    alt text

    That first half was so bad they gave themselves two zeros.

    Fair effort from the Ponies. Played with a bit of intensity and endeavour.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to sparky on last edited by
    #192

    @sparky said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    @Duluth said in Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4):

    TSF version of Godwin’s law:

    “As a thread grows longer, the probability of discussing the RWC failure or Akira Ioane approaches 1”

    Chiefs made an error not signing Akira Ioane. A new environment would have done him wonders and his driving play from Number 8 was exactly what the Chiefs missed tonight.

    RWC failure seems to haunt Sam Cane and ALB still. Neither fully imposed themselves on this game.

    Landed both in the same post. You get a gold star.

    sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
    3

Chiefs v Brumbies (round 4)
Rugby Matches
chiefsbrumbies
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.