• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Highlanders v Sharks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
highlanderssharks
196 Posts 36 Posters 6.1k Views
Highlanders v Sharks
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #158

    @Steven-Harris yeah across the board the Sharks players just seemed bigger and more robust in the exchanges.

    So Landers did the right thing in that 2nd half to speed the game up. Looked good, but then a couple of times when they had to score they coughed it up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    wrote on last edited by Stargazer
    #159

    Highlanders v Sharks: costly penalties, poor line-outs, bad kicking and big, strong South African backs

    I don't think anyone had very high expectations from this young, inexperienced Highlanders side, but the way the Highlanders lost was disappointing.

    Disappointing
    Coltman's line-out throwing was very bad (not that it was ever good, but it was just very noticeable in this game). Ill-discipline was costly (Curwin Bosch kicked 3 penalty goals). The Sharks conceded way more penalties (15; the Highlanders conceded 7), but not where they could lead to successful kicks at goal (and the Landers chose the line-out anyway).

    Rob Thompson - the most experienced back on the field - didn't lead by example, displaying a poor kicking game and making several other, uncharacteristic mistakes. Both Mitch Hunt and Josh Ioane couldn't get the backline firing and both produced wide passes that were almost intercepted by the speedy Sharks' backs. I don't know the reason for this 10-12 experiment, but it didn't work. Next game, they should try Ioane at 10, possibly with Hunt at 15 instead of McKay. Stat: Hunt missed two of his four kicks at goal (50%). Curwin Bosch's kicking percentage was 88% (he missed one kick).

    The inexperienced back three of Jona Nareki, Tima Fainga'anuku and Josh McKay couldn't get past the big South African defensive line: small men trying to run through big men usually doesn't work, but they tried it anyway. Gutsy, but not effective. Trying to catch the high ball with a big opposition player chasing, also wasn't a success. The back three also displayed the poor kicking game that we saw from Thompson. Not sure what the game plan was, but it either wasn't a good game plan, or it was poorly executed.

    The most disappointing stat of the night was that of turnovers: the Highlanders conceded 21 against the Sharks' 8.

    Positives
    Full credit should be given to the Sharks, with their powerful, big backline. Particularly, Makazole Mapimpi and Aphelele Fassi, who were running great lines with speed, were outstanding. The Sharks managed to turn many opportunities into tries - often feeding of Highlanders' mistakes. The Highlanders had no answer to the Sharks incredible line-speed.

    It was not all doom and gloom for the Highlanders though. The scrum went reasonably well; the Highlanders won 100% of their own scrums (the Sharks only 57%), especially Siate Tokolahi deserves a mention in this respect. The line-out improved considerably when Ash Dixon came on and there was a short Highlanders resurgence in the second half that could, and should, have made the score closer, if it wasn't for some soft tries given away at the end of the second half.

    Marino Mikaele-Tu'u was outstanding at number 8 and, by far, the best Highlander of the night. Most running metres of all players (105m), 3 clean breaks and 7 defenders beaten. Aaron Smith, despite a few bad passes, also had a very good game, both with his crisp passing and fast running.

    My MVP: Aphelele Fassi
    Best Highlanders player: Marino Mikaele-Tu'u
    Best Highlanders forward: Mikaele-Tu'u
    Best Highlanders back: Aaron Smith
    Most disappointing: Liam Coltman and Rob Thompson
    Greatest worry: the lack of size in the backs (especially the back three) and the team's inability to deal with the opposition's line-speed (I think we're going to reach that conclusion more often this season).

    (write-up based on detailed notes of the game and ESPN stats)

    antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #160

    @Stargazer said in Highlanders v Sharks:

    Best Highlanders forward: Mikaele-Tu'u
    Best Highlanders back: Aaron Smith

    By a long, long way unfortunately.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by
    #161

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Machpants
    wrote on last edited by
    #162

    SA teams looking pretty darned good, even with their huge exodus. Should be an interesting tighter comp this year, hopefully

    ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #163

    BOOM. Fucken take that naysayers. That's how you shit the bed.

    Highlanders appear to have spent the extra week taking etiquette lessons in how to curtsey and smile meekly whilst waving visitors in.

    Mixed bag from Fainganuku, who seemed to get better but will forever be judged by me on his biggest run. Nothing makes my blood boil more than watching a winger with the corner open decide he'd rather run into the cover.

    Matchbox 20 stone, what an atrocious performance. Too much weights not enough basic skills work.

    Something finally goes right for a SG special! Take a bow Mikael...Mika...Marino!

    Backline looked better with Ioane leading it last year than what I saw tonight. Although we probably missed Walden more than anything.

    That performance at the breakdown and general forward performance reminded me of the last time I was a canes supporter. Wonder what the link is?

    Don't really get the fuss about McKay. Think I'd rather see Collins given a bash.

    Dickson went well, good to see Hunt back out there and Lentjes actually starting to look like he's earnt his spot.

    Onwards and upwards.

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • sparkyS Offline
    sparkyS Offline
    sparky
    wrote on last edited by
    #164

    Sharks were excellent. Highlanders were dreadful. Bit of a Hammering.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • 9 Offline
    9 Offline
    98blueandgold
    wrote on last edited by
    #165

    For me we just do not have enough firepower and need our best 15 on the field at all times to get close to a result.

    In backs I think we need Walden and Tomkinson (even Nabura dear I say it) Just need to be able to match teams physically and for speed.

    In forwards the biggest disappointments were our locks, I thought they would really step up this year. Dickson played ok but Parkinson was anonymous and looked to avoid contact. There were a couple of times he could have won turnovers and he backed away.
    Next week In Canberra could be even worse!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #166

    @gt12 said in Highlanders v Sharks:

    McKay is no Ben Smith. Miles away from him.

    Not too many are.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    wrote on last edited by
    #167

    About the only positive for me is there's a chance teh Blues wind up 3rd, without playing much better than last year.

    Worrying how our NZ teams have fallen off a cliff. Fundamental skills missing in players - it's like we're optimising for size, and forgetting speed/skill is just as important. Saffers production line is back - they are going to be a hell of a force if they dont' destroy their team with politics (again)

    StargazerS BonesB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #168

    @nzzp said in Highlanders v Sharks:

    About the only positive for me is there's a chance teh Blues wind up 3rd, without playing much better than last year.

    Worrying how our NZ teams have fallen off a cliff. Fundamental skills missing in players - it's like we're optimising for size, and forgetting speed/skill is just as important. Saffers production line is back - they are going to be a hell of a force if they dont' destroy their team with politics (again)

    Not sure who you're talking about, but it was exactly size that the Highlanders were lacking in the backs, and the big lump in the forwards - Mikaele-Tu'u - was one of the best players on the field and showed plenty of skills.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    muddyriver
    wrote on last edited by
    #169

    Too many boys from bad nz 20s teams getting gigs.
    Too many 2nd tier players gone.
    But realistically highlanders are just reverting back to type after another golden period .

    1 Reply Last reply
    7
  • YeetyaahY Online
    YeetyaahY Online
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #170

    Just blame Hammer.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    wrote on last edited by
    #171

    The Hammettuer effect is in action. That was painful watching if you're a Highlanders fan, as an almost neutral who wanted the Highlanders to win there was some good attacking play from the Sharks.

    Good to see TBN get a run ... even if it was on the wing.

    Good to see Tu'u show what he's made of with decent minutes on the park.

    antipodeanA StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #172

    @Nepia said in Highlanders v Sharks:

    The Hammettuer effect is in action.

    How does he keep getting gigs or are we expected to believe the counterfactual. I.e. how bad they'd be without him?

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to antipodean on last edited by
    #173

    @antipodean said in Highlanders v Sharks:

    @Nepia said in Highlanders v Sharks:

    The Hammettuer effect is in action.

    How does he keep getting gigs or are we expected to believe the counterfactual. I.e. how bad they'd be without him?

    I guess he’s like those guys in any corporation who continue to fail their way up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • SiamS Offline
    SiamS Offline
    Siam
    wrote on last edited by
    #174

    Pretty decent indication of the depth of NZ rugby I'd have thought.

    Highlanders and nz lost a lot of intellectual property last year. Can't replace players with 10 years super rugby experience with a body the same size and expect the same results.

    Landers were decimated in a player turnover year like seldom (never) seen before. If you lose 2 thirds of your 1st 15, 500+ caps of experience you aren't going to be the same in anything but appearance, so I can't see how people expected too much.

    The Highlanders 2020 is as much a story about nz player depth as it is anything else

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • StargazerS Offline
    StargazerS Offline
    Stargazer
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #175

    @Nepia said in Highlanders v Sharks:

    The Hammettuer effect is in action.

    And is, apparently, stronger than the Tony Brown effect.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to Stargazer on last edited by
    #176

    @Stargazer said in Highlanders v Sharks:

    @nzzp said in Highlanders v Sharks:

    About the only positive for me is there's a chance teh Blues wind up 3rd, without playing much better than last year.

    Worrying how our NZ teams have fallen off a cliff. Fundamental skills missing in players - it's like we're optimising for size, and forgetting speed/skill is just as important. Saffers production line is back - they are going to be a hell of a force if they dont' destroy their team with politics (again)

    Not sure who you're talking about, but it was exactly size that the Highlanders were lacking in the backs, and the big lump in the forwards - Mikaele-Tu'u - was one of the best players on the field and showed plenty of skills.

    Sorry, yeah I expressed that badly. I was trying to say I think we've got a bunch of people out there who are physical specimens, but lack rugby (and often life) 'nous'. You see it at the Blues - great players, but just not skilled or rugby smart. I think chickens are coming home to roost in pro rugby here, and we're seeing one dimensional, narrow individuals playing the game.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BonesB Online
    BonesB Online
    Bones
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #177

    @nzzp said in Highlanders v Sharks:

    About the only positive for me is there's a chance teh Blues wind up 3rd, without playing much better than last year.

    Worrying how our NZ teams have fallen off a cliff. Fundamental skills missing in players - it's like we're optimising for size, and forgetting speed/skill is just as important. Saffers production line is back - they are going to be a hell of a force if they dont' destroy their team with politics (again)

    Fuuuuucken hell buddy. Are you alright?

    I hardly get that from watching the Highlanders play largely shit in their first game, against a very good sharks team.

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    0

Highlanders v Sharks
Rugby Matches
highlanderssharks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.