RWC Final: England v Springboks
-
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
We won a WC 8-7 so I wouldn’t go too far down that line. Rugby can be trench warfare and be exciting
It wasn't exciting at all. Fucking sucked. I thought I was going to die
-
@sparky said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
Would you call the 2011 final a dud product?
Yes, result was ok tho
-
Not an awful lot to talk about in that half. Both sides are better defenders than attackers, and so it played out. Some massive hits, and a period of great defense from the Boks on their own line, though all England really did the whole time was one off hit ups trying to just smash their way over.
Hoping it opens up a bit in the 2nd 40. If the Boks score first then they'll go more than 7 ahead and England will have to take a few more risks.
-
@sparky said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
Would you call the 2011 final a dud product?
That gamed need a product warning on it. My heart almost didn’t cope.
-
-
@chimoaus said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@sparky said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
Would you call the 2011 final a dud product?
That gamed need a product warning on it. My heart almost didn’t cope.
T-Bag and ending were pretty good though.
-
@Machpants said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
We won a WC 8-7 so I wouldn’t go too far down that line. Rugby can be trench warfare and be exciting
It wasn't exciting at all. Fucking sucked. I thought I was going to die
2005 Brian O'Driscoll is that you?
-
-
-
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@PN said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
Wonder what the odds are of Eddie taking a page out of the Italian's playbook and stitching up uncontested scrums?
That would be pretty smart, only one prop away
Cole to cop an injury? Does test rugby play man off? (I.E. the team that forces uncontested has to play with 14 players)?
-
South Africa have two fresh scrummaging props on the bench as well
-
@Anonymous said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Machpants said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
We won a WC 8-7 so I wouldn’t go too far down that line. Rugby can be trench warfare and be exciting
It wasn't exciting at all. Fucking sucked. I thought I was going to die
2005 Brian O'Driscoll is that you?
Don't you repress my right to identify as a whining Irish fluffybunny
I could've doid!
-
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
-
-
@MiketheSnow said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
But if Eddie watched our SF he knows SA can be beaten. We should have.
England can.
England need to get tighter not looser.
SA played within themselves and did enough to win against you. Always in control
-
@MrDenmore said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
The way the All Blacks play is what the market wants to see. This is a dud product.
Go watch league then.
2-all at halftime between NZ and GB
woot. -
@Damo said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@Kirwan said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
@PN said in RWC Final: England v Springboks:
Wonder what the odds are of Eddie taking a page out of the Italian's playbook and stitching up uncontested scrums?
That would be pretty smart, only one prop away
Cole to cop an injury? Does test rugby play man off? (I.E. the team that forces uncontested has to play with 14 players)?
Dunno, but I think they'd do better with 14 and uncontested scrums, than what they're doing ATM
