RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1)
-
@Duluth said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
That was hard to watch.
Read’s obvious disappointment and hurt made me want them to stop asking him questions.Bad luck to the ABs. You ran into an England team that played the best I have seen from them in a decade or more.
-
@The-Eagle said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
Don’t be too hard on your blokes. They tried as hard as they could. The difficulty with being consistently the best team in the world is that it feels doubly crap when you lose...although, how would I know.
PS good to see you fellas
Welcome back, even if briefly.
We haven't seen an ABs team schooled like that for a long time. Enjoy!
-
@The-Eagle said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
Don’t be too hard on your blokes. They tried as hard as they could. The difficulty with being consistently the best team in the world is that it feels doubly crap when you lose...although, how would I know.
PS good to see you fellas
Let me guess you googled “mourning rugby tragics” and found your way back.
Congrats on the win mate.
-
@ACT-Crusader said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
Well done England and Eddie Jones. Very good execution to keep us out of the game.
What he said
-
Well, I don't really feel too down - unlike 2007. Beaten by a far better team on the day. Still think we could have won it after Ardie scored but dumb penalties and mistakes stuffed up our chances.
Off to pull the swing-arm off the Suzuki and prep for a re-spray.
-
@Tim said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
@Duluth "A disrespectful question", "If you want to go outside I'll give you a rugby education".
Shut the fuck up you arrogant prick. You lost, the team was shit, you wear it.
He has the tamest press in the world normally. Oh no, someone asked him if the All Blacks "turned up with the right mindset?" They didn't, they choked under the pressure.
What the hell was that?
He had just said he asked them to get more desperate and hungrier at halftime. He has been pretty open in saying they haven't turned up with the right mindset in the past when they have been tipped over - as recently as Perth. We've lost RWC semi-finals on the back of not turning up mentally - 1999 being the obvious example.
Reasonable question - especially given the first two minutes. Crazy response - but in a way I like it in a way because all his other responses seem somewhat ambivalent.
-
-
-
-
@ACT-Crusader said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
@Devon-Kiwi said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
Like you guys have been a rabid ABs fan all of my life and have never ever missed a game
Have to ask, did Bob Deans score or not?
Of course, he bloody scored.
-
I honestly don’t think it was a case of NZ not being “hungry” enough.
England simply didn’t allow you to play. They were that good on the night. -
@Billy-Webb said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
I honestly don’t think it was a case of NZ not being “hungry” enough.
England simply didn’t allow you to play. They were that good on the night.I strongly disagree. We had opportunities to just try and get territory, then from there, try to build pressure - get penalties - and try to break them down. Instead, with every piece of possession we got, we took terrible options, usually kicking it straight back to them. Had we buckled down after the first try, and said, fuck it, let's just play it in their half, we'd have put ourselves in the position to have challenged. But we never put them under any pressure - in their half - and the only time we did, we got a lucky try. I'm fucked if I know who was running things out there, but whoever it was shouldn't wear a black jersey again, And if the do, I hope they have nightmares about this game. We got fucking hammered .
-
@Nepia said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
@Victor-Meldrew said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
Cane would have made a difference.
Also think he adds a lot in the leadership department - sadly lacking today.
Yeah, it's utter BS to pretend Cane wouldn't have made a difference when starting even if the result stayed the same - we have a much better chance of a win if he starts.
Agreed.
But S Barrett is the fall guy for a very shit Read performance and captaincy.
Unfair IMHO.
-
@gt12 said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
@Billy-Webb said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
I honestly don’t think it was a case of NZ not being “hungry” enough.
England simply didn’t allow you to play. They were that good on the night.I strongly disagree. We had opportunities to just try and get territory, then from there, try to build pressure - get penalties - and try to break them down. Instead, with every piece of possession we got, we took terrible options, usually kicking it straight back to them. Had we buckled down after the first try, and said, fuck it, let's just play it in their half, we'd have put ourselves in the position to have challenged. But we never put them under any pressure - in their half - and the only time we did, we got a lucky try. I'm fucked if I know who was running things out there, but whoever it was shouldn't wear a black jersey again, And if the do, I hope they have nightmares about this game. We got fucking hammered .
Fair enough comment. There were some poor options taken. But I see that in the context of England putting so much pressure on the ABs.
-
@rotated said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
@sparky said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
Steve Hansen "We played as well as we could today. We stepped up to the plate."
Utter bullsh#t. So long, fattie.
"The bronze final is an exciting opportunity for us" what the hell?
Fuck me thats bullshit
-
@MiketheSnow said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
@Nepia said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
@Victor-Meldrew said in RWC: England v New Zealand (SF1):
Cane would have made a difference.
Also think he adds a lot in the leadership department - sadly lacking today.
Yeah, it's utter BS to pretend Cane wouldn't have made a difference when starting even if the result stayed the same - we have a much better chance of a win if he starts.
Agreed.
But S Barrett is the fall guy for a very shit Read performance and captaincy.
Unfair IMHO.
No, the coaches are the fall guys for selecting Barrett - if you read my earlier post (and the one before the game) I note that it completely threw out the balance of the loose forwards trio. I even said Barrett had a decent game.
