Judiciary Happenings
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Might see some action tomorrow.
Louw punching. Video has disappeared. Will try to find it.
If he did, he's an idiot and I don't want him near the final then. Game costing stupidity if anyone indulges in that sort of thing these days. This Bok team has been so much better than that shit of late, I'd be deeply disappointed.
-
@Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Might see some action tomorrow.
Louw punching. Video has disappeared. Will try to find it.
If he did, he's an idiot and I don't want him near the final then. Game costing stupidity if anyone indulges in that sort of thing these days. This Bok team has been so much better than that shit of late, I'd be deeply disappointed.
Being held in at ruck, then delivers several uppercuts.
Can't see whether they connect, but intent was there.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
@Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Might see some action tomorrow.
Louw punching. Video has disappeared. Will try to find it.
If he did, he's an idiot and I don't want him near the final then. Game costing stupidity if anyone indulges in that sort of thing these days. This Bok team has been so much better than that shit of late, I'd be deeply disappointed.
Being held in at ruck, then delivers several uppercuts.
Can't see whether they connect, but intent was there.
ah, fair enough then
No, seriously, although I have a degree of sympathy for responding to off-the-ball illegal play, if he's swing punches it is stupidity of epic proportions.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
@Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Might see some action tomorrow.
Louw punching. Video has disappeared. Will try to find it.
If he did, he's an idiot and I don't want him near the final then. Game costing stupidity if anyone indulges in that sort of thing these days. This Bok team has been so much better than that shit of late, I'd be deeply disappointed.
Being held in at ruck, then delivers several uppercuts.
Can't see whether they connect, but intent was there.
I recall seeing someone held in a ruck but from the wide angle it looked like he was busy hitting the hand that was holding him in. May be different from a close shot.
If he's punching a person rather than hitting the arm holding him in, then no problems with him fronting the judiciary and missing the final. However, if it's the latter, then play on McDuff.
-
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Best I could find to date. Hit full screen.
Would love to see the reverse angle on that.
Intent is there. Connection?
Definitely on the arm.
-
@antipodean said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Best I could find to date. Hit full screen.
Would love to see the reverse angle on that.
Intent is there. Connection?
Definitely on the arm.
With his left hand yes.
would like to see what he's connecting with with his right hand uppercuts.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
@antipodean said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Best I could find to date. Hit full screen.
Would love to see the reverse angle on that.
Intent is there. Connection?
Definitely on the arm.
With his left hand yes.
would like to see what he's connecting with with his right hand uppercuts.
The arm holding onto him.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
@antipodean said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Best I could find to date. Hit full screen.
Would love to see the reverse angle on that.
Intent is there. Connection?
Definitely on the arm.
With his left hand yes.
would like to see what he's connecting with with his right hand uppercuts.
Nah. Unless there is another angle showing something else, you can let this one go Mike. From that angle it looks like a guy trying to free himself up from being illegally held back.
