Judiciary Happenings
-
@Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:
Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.
Wayne Barnes was a moran for over 80 minutes and his career blossomed afterwards.
Faeces has consistently been a moran and is still getting the big jobs.
Jaco might be O.K. but that would require some consistency. -
@Snowy said in Judiciary Happenings:
@Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:
Just hope for his sake it doesn't permanently harm his career.
Wayne Barnes was a moran for over 80 minutes and his career blossomed afterwards.
Faeces has consistently been a moran and is still getting the big jobs.
Jaco might be O.K. but that would require some consistency.Good points all of those.
At least Clive Woodward thinks it's a storm-in-a-teacup:
"I support Jaco Peyper 100 percent in having a little fun with Welsh supporters on Sunday night. It's ludicrous that the so-called incident is being investigated in any way and for those in the French camp kicking off I would say you have infinitely more serious things to be considering. Such as your shambolic coaching and persistent ill-discipline on the pitch which for decades now has seen France under-perform. There is zero controversy or intrigue here, the French lock got precisely what he deserved. Jaco Peyper was out relaxing after a huge game and the day a referee cannot enjoy a beer and a joke with either the players or fans is the day rugby has lost its way."
Not often I'd say this - but nicely said Sir Clive!
-
Might see some action tomorrow.
Louw punching. Video has disappeared. Will try to find it.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Might see some action tomorrow.
Louw punching. Video has disappeared. Will try to find it.
If he did, he's an idiot and I don't want him near the final then. Game costing stupidity if anyone indulges in that sort of thing these days. This Bok team has been so much better than that shit of late, I'd be deeply disappointed.
-
@Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Might see some action tomorrow.
Louw punching. Video has disappeared. Will try to find it.
If he did, he's an idiot and I don't want him near the final then. Game costing stupidity if anyone indulges in that sort of thing these days. This Bok team has been so much better than that shit of late, I'd be deeply disappointed.
Being held in at ruck, then delivers several uppercuts.
Can't see whether they connect, but intent was there.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
@Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Might see some action tomorrow.
Louw punching. Video has disappeared. Will try to find it.
If he did, he's an idiot and I don't want him near the final then. Game costing stupidity if anyone indulges in that sort of thing these days. This Bok team has been so much better than that shit of late, I'd be deeply disappointed.
Being held in at ruck, then delivers several uppercuts.
Can't see whether they connect, but intent was there.
ah, fair enough then
No, seriously, although I have a degree of sympathy for responding to off-the-ball illegal play, if he's swing punches it is stupidity of epic proportions.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
@Billy-Webb said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Might see some action tomorrow.
Louw punching. Video has disappeared. Will try to find it.
If he did, he's an idiot and I don't want him near the final then. Game costing stupidity if anyone indulges in that sort of thing these days. This Bok team has been so much better than that shit of late, I'd be deeply disappointed.
Being held in at ruck, then delivers several uppercuts.
Can't see whether they connect, but intent was there.
I recall seeing someone held in a ruck but from the wide angle it looked like he was busy hitting the hand that was holding him in. May be different from a close shot.
If he's punching a person rather than hitting the arm holding him in, then no problems with him fronting the judiciary and missing the final. However, if it's the latter, then play on McDuff.
-
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Best I could find to date. Hit full screen.
Would love to see the reverse angle on that.
Intent is there. Connection?
Definitely on the arm.
-
@antipodean said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Best I could find to date. Hit full screen.
Would love to see the reverse angle on that.
Intent is there. Connection?
Definitely on the arm.
With his left hand yes.
would like to see what he's connecting with with his right hand uppercuts.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
@antipodean said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Best I could find to date. Hit full screen.
Would love to see the reverse angle on that.
Intent is there. Connection?
Definitely on the arm.
With his left hand yes.
would like to see what he's connecting with with his right hand uppercuts.
The arm holding onto him.
-
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
@antipodean said in Judiciary Happenings:
@MiketheSnow said in Judiciary Happenings:
Best I could find to date. Hit full screen.
Would love to see the reverse angle on that.
Intent is there. Connection?
Definitely on the arm.
With his left hand yes.
would like to see what he's connecting with with his right hand uppercuts.
Nah. Unless there is another angle showing something else, you can let this one go Mike. From that angle it looks like a guy trying to free himself up from being illegally held back.
