Stormers v Crusaders
-
@taniwharugby said in Stormers v Crusaders:
Jason Pine is talking about this now on RS, saying there is no reason why the 'victims' would make this up...
I expect this, as with most things, is being blown out of proportion.
#believewomen
-
So apparently those that have accused the players of abuse are in the process of sourcing CC TV footage from the McDonalds where these events eventuated. They are adamant that the Crusader players are lying and are going to do anything to prove that.
I guess all will be revealed when that footage comes out.
-
-
Who knows, I guess if what they said did happen then they would be feeling pretty aggrieved, thus determined to back up their claims through footage.
On the other hand if they somehow can't pinpoint the event within that footage then they are most likely lying.
-
@Canes4life said in Stormers v Crusaders:
So apparently those that have accused the players of abuse are in the process of sourcing CC TV footage from the McDonalds where these events eventuated. They are adamant that the Crusader players are lying and are going to do anything to prove that.
I guess all will be revealed when that footage comes out.
My worry is that they're going to get Marius Jonker to make a ruling on the footage.
-
@Canes4life said in Stormers v Crusaders:
So apparently those that have accused the players of abuse are in the process of sourcing CC TV footage from the McDonalds where these events eventuated. They are adamant that the Crusader players are lying and are going to do anything to prove that.
I guess all will be revealed when that footage comes out.
I'll be quite interested to see what the SA guys are wearing. If Bridge asked them to take a selfie with him then I'm thinking it's going to be quite outlandish - and I can then see how things might have gone wrong from there.
-
@Chris-B said in Stormers v Crusaders:
@Machpants said in Stormers v Crusaders:
If it's proven the saders and probably the ABs will miss him for the rest of this year.
And there I was, just thinking, fuck it - he's going to get stood down for this week!
Since he's already apologised to the woman and she noted one of his friends came over and apologised in the nightclub, I think it can be assumed that someone (from the Crusaders) has told him he did it - spat beer on her - even though he can't remember it.
she isn't a waitress named Suzie is she?
-
@Toddy said in Stormers v Crusaders:
Will McDonald's really care enough to provide security footage. Seems pretty low level accusations for them to go to those lengths.
Unless things are different in South Africa, then I would be surprised if McDonalds hands over footage. In Qld, businesses like McD's and bars will normally only give provide footage to police when they are investigating criminal offences. Some businesses even insist on a search warrant.
-
No one has responded that Mounga did actually reply to the women.
You can fake Instagram/Facebook/Twitter messages to make it look like they’ve actually apologisedshe admitted it was dark so wasn’t 100% sure it was him.
All seems suspect to me nothing adds up -
-
-
-
@Stargazer I think you will find They will not.The Crusaders I have heard have witness statements from other people at McDonalds (who contacted the Crusaders)They are disputing the allegations and stating, "These people have a lot to answer for". So lets see where this goes.
-
@Smudge said in Stormers v Crusaders:
@Canes4life said in Stormers v Crusaders:
So apparently those that have accused the players of abuse are in the process of sourcing CC TV footage from the McDonalds where these events eventuated. They are adamant that the Crusader players are lying and are going to do anything to prove that.
I guess all will be revealed when that footage comes out.
My worry is that they're going to get Marius Jonker to make a ruling on the footage.
Outstanding sir.
-
@Chris said in Stormers v Crusaders:
@Stargazer I think you will find They will not.The Crusaders I have heard have witness statements from other people at McDonalds (who contacted the Crusaders)They are disputing the allegations and stating, "These people have a lot to answer for". So lets see where this goes.
Just so I am clear the "These people have a lot to answer for" are the Accused or the Accusers?
-
@Hooroo said in Stormers v Crusaders:
@Chris said in Stormers v Crusaders:
@Stargazer I think you will find They will not.The Crusaders I have heard have witness statements from other people at McDonalds (who contacted the Crusaders)They are disputing the allegations and stating, "These people have a lot to answer for". So lets see where this goes.
Just so I am clear the "These people have a lot to answer for" are the Accused or the Accusers?
cantabs
-
@Toddy it’s extremely easy to get the footage from the McDonald’s id say with all the media attention it’s worth it
