NZ v Bangladesh Test #1
-
@MajorRage said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:
Wagner going apeshit. Much more interesting this evening.
I farken love Wags
-
@Cyclops said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:
Watling coming out indicates that we're still a long way away from declaring. I probably would have sent Colin in to hope for another Wagneresque innings. Lead is already close to 300.
We should give ourselves plenty of time to get them out. A day and a half should do it. Or even put them in for an hour tonight
-
Styris going on about a back foot no ball, about how it is first point of contact.
The law states:
21.5.1 the bowler’s back foot must land within and not touching the return crease appertaining to his/her stated mode of delivery.
So I read that as if your back foot touches the line it's a no ball.
Bowler landed on his toes and then bought his heel down onto the line. I would say the umpire is correct in calling no ball as that was part of his back foot landing.
What says The Fern?
-
@booboo said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:
Styris going on about a back foot no ball, about how it is first point of contact.
The law states:
21.5.1 the bowler’s back foot must land within and not touching the return crease appertaining to his/her stated mode of delivery.
So I read that as if your back foot touches the line it's a no ball.
Bowler landed on his toes and then bought his heel down onto the line. I would say the umpire is correct in calling no ball as that was part of his back foot landing.
What says The Fern?
I read it as all being at the time it lands. Agree that it's not completely clear though.
-
-
It's a Saturdee in Hamilton for crying out loud. it's not like Eminem is playing.....so how come there's about as many spectators as there is players?
Bangladesh sure aren't much of a drawcard.
Nice to see KW smash an unbeaten double, this guy sure is good.
Also amusing to see @mariner4life s mate CDGH smash quick runs against a demoralised attack and ensure his spot in the test team for at least the next 10-15 tests.
@Virgil not wrong, that is some effort from numbers 1-3
-
@mimic said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:
Pretty selfish to declare after reaching his milestone
I thought he didnt care much for stats
Why not wait for CdG.. give him a couple of overs..Maybe because with the lead as it was they had settled on declaring at drinks - and Kane managed to get enough balls faced to score his 200. Hardly selfish and given what happened against sri lanka, extra time on what is a friendly pitch is not a bad idea
-
-
@booboo said in NZ v Bangladesh Test #1:
4 down in an impossible position to bat out 2 days, but playing on a road with two set batsmen who didn't look greatly challenged ...
...a bit too much like first test v Lankans ...
Don't expect that to happen again though. (Fingers crossed.)
Not the same quality of batting for this Bangladeshi side.
-
-
Can't find coverage on Fox today. Instead we get to watch the chicks play cricket in slow motion.
No ball Law | MCC
