Other Cricket
-
Interesting stats
Root as non-captain 53 tests, batting average 52.80
Root as captain 28 tests, batting average 42.48Kane as non-captain 48 tests, batting average 49.23
Kane as captain 24 tests, batting average 63.69Kohli's numbers are 41.13 and then 62.70 as captain
Smith is 51.83 and then 70.36 as captain -
-
@Rapido said in Other Cricket:
My hunch is Ireland will find 200 (and the pressure) too much.
Their own first innings batting collapse may be costly, left their number 5 stranded on just 28 not out.But here's hoping.
I agree - I think 200 will be too far. But, as you say, here's hoping.
So, I just copied your post. Good for me. I will say if the pitch flattens out, and the openers can see off the hard ball, that 200 is very very gettable. So maybe I am optimistic... will take some disciplined batting for an hour, and then it'll be game on for Ireland.
-
Imagine winning your first test in less than 20 odd years of, admittedly war-interrupted, trying.
It took us:
20 years to win our first test.
30 years to win our first away test.
45 years to win our first test v England.
50 years to win our first test in England.
66 years to win our first test at Lords. -
-
@Donsteppa said in Other Cricket:
Ireland are collapsing faster than a Wallabies scrum.
Jaysus, out for 38. Didn't see that coming. Well done the poms, but gutted for the Irish; that was a golden opportunity. Chase 180 and it's all glory, but they just fell apart
-
-
@jegga said in Other Cricket:
( Richie Benaud voice ).........Welcome back here to the Support Womens Sport Basin Reserve.......
Ah yeah nah thanks.....
-
Shame, I loved watching this guy bowl. Always had that slightly unhinged look in his eyes and he was as good as anyone.
Dale Steyn retires from Tests, will focus on limited-overs cricket
"It's terrible to consider never playing another Test again but what's more terrifying is the thought of never playing again at all," says South Africa's all-time highest wicket taker
-
Modern day great
actually, fuck that, 439 @ 23 is all time. What a player, my favourite modern bowler.
-
@mariner4life said in Other Cricket:
Modern day great
actually, fuck that, 439 @ 23 is all time. What a player, my favourite modern bowler.
Yep that's Hadlee standard and remember Steyn played when anything under 30 is pretty outstanding.
-
-
@nzzp said in Other Cricket:
@MN5 said in Other Cricket:
Shame, I loved watching this guy bowl. Always had that slightly unhinged look in his eyes and he was as good as anyone.
Madman. Absolute quality, to ge tthose figures. Crazy cool dude too
Interesting he's given up the longest form, great ODI stats but it's as a test bowler he really shines.
-
@MN5 said in Other Cricket:
Interesting he's given up the longest form, great ODI stats but it's as a test bowler he really shines.
Agreed.
But his body just can't deal with the volume required in tests anymore.
Even an ODI feels a stretch. Suspect he will gravitate to T20's.Interesting fact given that injuries are now haunting him - he was one of the least injured bowlers early on in his career. It has really only been the last 3-4 years that father time has come to claim its dues.
-
Out of interest, I thought I'd do a comparison of Hadlee (left) and Steyn (right).
Shows just how much work Hadlee got through in his career - 7 matches less (86 vs 93), but bowled around 2,400 more deliveries than Steyn.
Bowling has a lot of similarities, but Hadlee was 3x the batsmen (literally).
Was a pleasure to watch Steyn, one of the few fast bowlers I went out of my way to watch. Quality for ages, and a dead set legend.
Hadlee (left) vs Steyn (right)
-
@nzzp said in Other Cricket:
Out of interest, I thought I'd do a comparison of Hadlee (left) and Steyn (right).
Shows just how much work Hadlee got through in his career - 7 matches less (86 vs 93), but bowled around 2,400 more deliveries than Steyn.
Bowling has a lot of similarities, but Hadlee was 3x the batsmen (literally).
Was a pleasure to watch Steyn, one of the few fast bowlers I went out of my way to watch. Quality for ages, and a dead set legend.
Hadlee (left) vs Steyn (right)
pains me to say it but Steyn may have been better. The argument can be made.....
In Hadlees favour is 36 michelles vs 26 which indicates he bowled more singular match changing spells. Batting is no comparison obviously but I still wouldn't call Sir RJ a true all rounder.
In Steyns favour is the era he played being much friendlier for batsman yet he still averaged only a smidgen under Paddles. Also a strike rate of 42 vs 50 speaks for itself too.
