Wallabies v Ireland - Test #2 (Melbourne)
-
Haha pocock dives over, seals the ball. Ref for some reason gives aussies scrum feed
-
@mariner4life Yeah, didn't Pocock just completely go straight to ground and seal it off? Never let the guy release either.
Awful ref.
-
You dumb auusie fucks, if they don't have the ball, don't fucking hit them!
-
Gee the irish are inventive on attack. Really making the aussies make decisions on defense....
And eventually the bash over
-
Despite Ireland getting the try, I'd still be carding the player who rolled over and lay on the wrong side of the ruck.
-
Rugby is officially NFL
-
@mimic said in Wallabies v Ireland - Test #2 (Melbourne):
Yeah, for me it's a YC or a PT. Getting both is harsh.
The ref, however, knows the law. A PT should come with a card.
You may argue the law is wrong all you like, but the ref is obliged to use them as written.
-
@chester-draws said in Wallabies v Ireland - Test #2 (Melbourne):
@mimic said in Wallabies v Ireland - Test #2 (Melbourne):
Yeah, for me it's a YC or a PT. Getting both is harsh.
The ref, however, knows the law. A PT should come with a card.
You may argue the law is wrong all you like, but the ref is obliged to use them as written.
Depends. An penalisable transgression that prevents a try may result in a PT, but the action may not meet the threshold of a YC.
90 secs for Wallabies to score a converted try.
-
Yesssssssss
-
@mariner4life said in Wallabies v Ireland - Test #2 (Melbourne):
Gee the irish are inventive on attack. Really making the aussies make decisions on defense...
It's the big question hanging over Schmidt's coaching. Are the players he has just bereft of attacking instinct, or does he coach it out of them?
-
Lads. At long last NZ has a decent ref. That was an excellent display.
-
@billy-tell said in Wallabies v Ireland - Test #2 (Melbourne):
Lads. At long last NZ has a decent ref. That was an excellent display.
The second half, yes.
