• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

Lions v Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
blueslions
102 Posts 31 Posters 7.6k Views
Lions v Blues
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Online
    A Online
    African Monkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    Just incase people didn't know, I think Hamish Bidwell hates the Blues

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/102167376/dark-day-for-lions-rugby-as-they-capitulate-to-blues-at-ellis-park

    nzzpN 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • nzzpN Offline
    nzzpN Offline
    nzzp
    replied to African Monkey on last edited by
    #90

    @african-monkey said in Lions v Blues:

    Just incase people didn't know, I think Hamish Bidwell hates the Blues

    Fark, that's bitter.

    HoorooH 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to nzzp on last edited by
    #91

    @nzzp said in Lions v Blues:

    @african-monkey said in Lions v Blues:

    Just incase people didn't know, I think Hamish Bidwell hates the Blues

    Fark, that's bitter.

    Is it fair though? The Blues lost to a very weak Chiefs side that they should have been able to put away. To me it does say more about the Lions

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Do not disturb
    S Do not disturb
    Steven Harris
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by Steven Harris
    #92

    @hooroo we put the boot into the Blues on most occasions,but on this occasion to fly into Joburg a day late and beat a Lions team that has been easily been the best team in the republic in the last few seasons and at various stages of the game your down 0-21 & 10-28 and you finish the stronger against the home team at altitude,to me that’s a more than solid effort
    Personally I think the Blues were very poor against the chiefs,I believe they dropped their standards from the Landers game.

    KiwiMurphK HoorooH 2 Replies Last reply
    7
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #93

    @steven-harris the Blues also had better selection v the Lions than they had v Chiefs - Rieko at centre, Wright as the bench hooker, Perofeta as the replacement 10 etc.

    TimT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Steven Harris on last edited by
    #94

    @steven-harris said in Lions v Blues:

    @hooroo we put the boot into the Blues on most occasions,but on this occasion to fly into Joburg a day late and beat a Lions team that has been easily been the best team in the republic in the last few seasons and at various stages of the game your down 0-21 & 10-28 and you finish the stronger against the home team at altitude,to me that’s a more than solid effort
    Personally I think the Blues were very poor against the chiefs,I believe they dropped their standards from the Landers game.

    Fair enough. I guess time will tell regarding the effectiveness of the Lions. It is always good to go and win away in SA

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    replied to KiwiMurph on last edited by
    #95

    @kiwimurph My 6/2 bench pick with Perofeta covering fullback paid off. 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • TimT Away
    TimT Away
    Tim
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    Nick Mallett on the game:

    http://www.sarugbymag.co.za/blog/details/lions-loss-is-worrying

    Full credit to the Blues. They made 938m against 547 for the Lions. The Lions had to make 177 tackles and 86 for the Blues. The Lions missed 32 tackles against 12 for the Blues. The Blues made 208 passes to 110 for the Lions, so nearly twice as many, and they enjoyed 63% territory as opposed to 37%. Those are really dominant statistics in terms of metres made, forcing the opposition to tackle more and, in the end, it was the better team that won.

    DuluthD DiceD 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #97

    Collins really does need to work hard on that speed/agility. He gets in great positions but just needs that explosiveness to be able to exploit them better.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #98

    @tim

    Which is part of the reason why Blues fans should be a little wary. We were dominating the stats throughout the game, yet somehow we were down by 18 points at the the 63min mark?? Until that final quarter it looked like a continuation of the Chiefs match.

    There's loads of positives from this match, but you still have to look at how much of a hole the Blues got themselves into.

    gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • gt12G Offline
    gt12G Offline
    gt12
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #99

    @duluth

    It's a good point, but I think you might have to buckle up and let that happen, because a few of those points came about from the way the Blues play - pushing passes and trying to take advantage of space can lead to turnovers (e.g., SBW dropped offload) and intercepts (e.g., Ruru) that lead to points. They are a risky team, but can really punish sides when it comes off.

    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    wrote on last edited by Duluth
    #100

    I thought this game was similar to the same match from a couple of years ago.

    I just looked it up, back in 2014 it was a slightly different result. Instead of winning 38-35 the comeback fell short and we lost 36-39. At the 64min the Blues were down by 15

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to gt12 on last edited by
    #101

    @gt12

    Good point. Then we might as well go all out attack - Duffie to fullback and Clarke on the wing. Try to win games 55-50

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • DiceD Offline
    DiceD Offline
    Dice
    replied to Tim on last edited by
    #102

    @tim said in Lions v Blues:

    Nick Mallett on the game:

    http://www.sarugbymag.co.za/blog/details/lions-loss-is-worrying

    Full credit to the Blues. They made 938m against 547 for the Lions. The Lions had to make 177 tackles and 86 for the Blues. The Lions missed 32 tackles against 12 for the Blues. The Blues made 208 passes to 110 for the Lions, so nearly twice as many, and they enjoyed 63% territory as opposed to 37%. Those are really dominant statistics in terms of metres made, forcing the opposition to tackle more and, in the end, it was the better team that won.

    We were meant to end this game with no legs, but it was the Lions who ended up gassing because of how many tackles they had to make.

    Although our bench did well, I'm wary of expecting them to repeat that feat, as they were given a pretty favourable situation to come into.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2

Lions v Blues
Rugby Matches
blueslions
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.