• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

ABs v Scotland

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksscotland
536 Posts 67 Posters 43.0k Views
ABs v Scotland
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #382

    @no-quarter said in ABs v Scotland:

    @taniwharugby @Nepia He could have not aimlessly run into the Scotsman in the air. I do agree with you guys though, but that's not how it's been ruled for some time. Hence I think he was very lucky to stay on.

    And as I said, look at the French XV game, the French winger fully tackled an AB in the air and didn't get carded - maybe their is a new normal being established?

    I don't think he ran aimlessely at all (and I've put the boot into Naholo many teams for his terrible kick chase). Common sense ruled as the impeding Scot player was a clear factor.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    replied to taniwharugby on last edited by
    #383

    @taniwharugby said in ABs v Scotland:

    @no-quarter after the obstruction from the Scot?

    Absolutely, when he realised he wasn't going to be able to make a play at the ball he should have stopped running forward. Yup mitigating circumstances but you can't just absolve Naholo of all responsibilty there.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Online
    No QuarterN Online
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #384

    @Nepia if WR are going to suddenly change the way this is being ruled it'd be great if they could actually inform the viewing public! Otherwise controversy ensues...

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #385

    @no-quarter said in ABs v Scotland:

    @Nepia if WR are going to suddenly change the way this is being ruled it'd be great if they could actually inform the viewing public! Otherwise controversy ensues...

    I don't think they even told people initially when they first started being anal about it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Talisker
    wrote on last edited by
    #386

    The collision with Hogg in the air was never a card, never in a month of Sundays.

    However, there were a few repeated penalties as we put pressure on and I don't think seven or eight cards would have been unwarranted - Cane himself should have had at least four ABs binned for the stuff he was getting up to

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Nepia on last edited by
    #387

    @nepia said in ABs v Scotland:

    @no-quarter That wasn't a yellow on Naholo, the French XV match established a new precedent. Plus, they go there in the end with the right decision I think, there were clear mitigating circumstances.

    Surprised they didn't penalise the Jock running obstruction aftr precedent mid-week

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Talisker
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #388

    @booboo "Jock"

    really?

    boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Talisker on last edited by
    #389

    @talisker said in ABs v Scotland:

    @booboo "Jock"

    really?

    Porridge Wog?

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Talisker
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #390

    @booboo

    Colonial?

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Crash
    wrote on last edited by
    #391

    Can't whinge about the ref. Thought he was ok overall....now Australia on the other hand...
    Cane's YC was pretty cynical.
    Just wish we would stop doing the dumb stuff. Naholo has a history of tackling players in mid-air. He should be taken aside and given a coaching clinic. Why does he persist in doing this shit? Shag have a word FFS.

    NepiaN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Talisker on last edited by
    #392

    @talisker

    Genuine question: is that an issue?

    Is standard term for Scotsman here (like Boer, Frog, Paddy, Pom).

    T boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Talisker on last edited by
    #393

    @talisker said in ABs v Scotland:

    @booboo

    Colonial?

    Cap fits.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • NepiaN Offline
    NepiaN Offline
    Nepia
    replied to Crash on last edited by
    #394

    @crash said in ABs v Scotland:

    Can't whinge about the ref. Thought he was ok overall....now Australia on the other hand...
    > Cane's YC was pretty cynical.
    Just wish we would stop doing the dumb stuff. Naholo has a history of tackling players in mid-air. He should be taken aside and given a coaching clinic. Why does he persist in doing this shit? Shag have a word FFS.

    On the replay it actually looked like Cane got pushed over by another AB and then sealing off the ball. Crockett's was stupid, really stupid, the 9 hadn't even really done that stupid NH roll the ball thing they do that refs let them get away with.

    taniwharugbyT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Talisker
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #395

    @booboo
    It would take a lot longer to answer properly than half past two on a Sunday morning allows.
    The short answer is that using "Jock" isn't cool

    boobooB Mick Gold Coast QLDM 2 Replies Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #396

    @booboo said in ABs v Scotland:

    @talisker

    Genuine question: is that an issue?

    Is standard term for Scotsman here (like Boer, Frog, Paddy, Pom).

    I prefer it to "Sweaty" that some of the Poms use.

    I laughed at Jegga's term Porridge Wog

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Talisker on last edited by
    #397

    @talisker said in ABs v Scotland:

    @booboo
    It would take a lot longer to answer properly than half past two on a Sunday morning allows.
    The short answer is that using "Jock" isn't cool

    Righto. I'll look for a suitable alternative

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Talisker
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #398

    @booboo

    I guess you are okay with "Kiwi"

    We only have derogatory shite from the English, such as Sweaty or Jock, that is why I object to it

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to Talisker on last edited by
    #399

    @talisker said in ABs v Scotland:

    @booboo

    I guess you are okay with "Kiwi"

    I think we named ourselves that

    T 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Talisker
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #400

    @booboo
    Hence you (plural) being fine with it - we didn't choose those nicknames for Scots

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Crash
    replied to Talisker on last edited by
    #401

    @talisker most people don't choose their nickname?

    T MartyM 2 Replies Last reply
    0

ABs v Scotland
Rugby Matches
allblacksscotland
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.