Crusaders vs Force
-
@Chris-B. I'm also surprised that Bateman is named at 13; I thought he was brought back into the Crusaders squad to cover 10 and 12; we'll see how it will be played on the field.
Havili will cover 12. He played there when Crotty was injured last year. After Crotty's return (and Fonotia lost his spot), Crotty moved to 13 and Havili again played at 12.
McKenzie will cover 10 and 15.
-
I'd have thought Crotty will be staying at 12 as they shake down their top back line. Makes sense from that angle to see how Bateman goes at 13 compared to 12. I think they'll go alright, but expect to see Crotty taking most of the hit up runs.
I really liked Bateman when he was at the Canes and thought he was pretty decent prior to that. Not the biggest midfielder but he's got skills and is a clever player. Good pick up by the Saders imo.
-
Bateman played an NPC season at 13 a while back so I don't mind that call. I like Crotty defensively at 12.
Scott Barrett finished out the match last week pretty well at blindside. But Romano has provided spark off the bench which we won't get this week.
Wainui is NPC standard at best at that stage. Many work ons on both sides of the ball.
-
-
Luke Morahan, Alex Newsome, Curtis Rona, Marcel Brache, Chance Peni, Jono Lance (c), Ryan Louwrens, Richard Hardwick, Kane Koteka, Isi Naisarani, Matt Philip, Ross Haylett-Petty, Jermaine Ainsley, Tatafu Polota-Nau, Ben Daley
Reserves: Heath Tessmann, Pek Cowan, Tetera Faulkner, Richie Arnold, Matt Hodgson, Michael Ruru, Ian Prior, Robbie Coleman
-
I think Goodhues value in the Crusaders backline went up with his absence last week, although things did look better the moment Wainui went off.
-
-
@ACT-Crusader Yeah - Romano provides some additional bulk and muscle that our pack is a bit short on when he's not there.
Packweight when we have Whitelock and Barrett as locks seems to be about 865kg - which always looks a bit light when the opposition is fielding 900+kg packs. Luckily to date we've got plenty of technique to more than hold our own, but an extra 20 kg added to the pack through the re-shuffle might give us a bit more power and dominance in the scrum and maul.
-
I'm pretty excited about Barrett at 6. The AB selectors will be watching closely too - adds a lot of value if we can have someone genuinely cover lock/6 on the bench.
-
@No-Quarter said in Crusaders vs Force:
I'm pretty excited about Barrett at 6. The AB selectors will be watching closely too - adds a lot of value if we can have someone genuinely cover lock/6 on the bench.
Me too, still think he's a bit on the small side for a starting place at lock in the big games.
I mentioned in previous threads that I thought Robertson would look at playing him at 6. He would have seen him play club rugby there. Definitely a better option than Bedwell-Curtis.
-
Easier to go from 6 to lock than the other way around so Barrett will need as much time in that position as possible.
While having utilities on the AB bench is an advantage I'd be happy to see both Retallick and Whitelock play the full 80 mins. Squire would be most at risk if Barrett is a success at 6.
-
-
@Chris-B. said in Crusaders vs Force:
@SammyC I thought Razor didn't bother going to club rugby?!
Have you seen Dunshea play at all, Sammy?
He goes, But not to games involving a certain club I support.
Can't recall seeing dunshea, I'll ask the old man, he remembers players a bit better than me.
-
@SammyC said in Crusaders vs Force:
@Chris-B. said in Crusaders vs Force:
@SammyC I thought Razor didn't bother going to club rugby?!
Have you seen Dunshea play at all, Sammy?
He goes, But not to games involving a certain club I support.
Can't recall seeing dunshea, I'll ask the old man, he remembers players a bit better than me.
@Chris-B i just had a look and see he plays for Lincoln. So was probably at lock in the 2 games last year I saw Barrett at 6.
Both Lincoln locks looked bigger than Barrett from the sideline, so at least we aren't taking the Umaga approach of selecting shrimps in that position.
