NZ v SA Test Series
-
-
@MajorRage said in NZ v SA Test Series:
Yep, we need a wicket in the next 5 overs otherwise, the pressure release valve has been activated. Scoring freely now.
You're a good man @MajorRage
-
Neesham struggles a bit to find a decent line, but he gets the ball through.
He's fresh, but bowling in the low 140s. Boult came back to bowl the final over of the session and didn't get past 136kmh. I can't really recall Timmy past 140 in recent times.
Handy getting Faf. The big miss was at the start of the session where BJ was slow to get down to an Elgar nick and dropped it. Would have been 60 something for four.
-
And so ends the day.
Positives? The first hour. And despite still being in and only 4 down at stumps, they've only got 229 on the board, meaning they haven't got away on us.
Negatives are the workloads on the top 4 bowlers; by all accounts the fielding (again); and the fact they've been pretty comfortable even if not scoring. Imagine if ABdV was in now?
-
Very disappointing end result given that Cook, Amla and Duminy scored five runs between them.
Still, as I've noted before, on most pitches I reckon 220/4 is par, so hard to say they've really got away from us.
Is it too harsh to note that if Jeets can avoid getting a wicket for another 28 runs he'll get his test average up to 50?
-
-
This post is deleted!
-
-
@Hooroo said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@MN5 Did you know Patel hasn't take a test wicket in NZ since 2010!!!
Just thought you would like to know
You can bust out all kinds of statistics to prove a point especially on the interweb but I'm sure his variation is worth more than any number of Michelle's.....
-
-
-
@Tim said in NZ v SA Test Series:
That was a joke of a shot. Get out of test cricket and stay out.
Certainly a terrible shot - T20 effort. His captain won't be happy - Bavuma was looking untroubled and could have pushed them on to 400. If things go badly for SA in the next half hour we might get them for around 300 on what now looks like a pretty flat track.
