NZ v SA Test Series
-
-
@Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:
That is an extremely foolish selection by NZ Cricket.
Did they not see the shitstorms that blew up around the Chiefs and Wellington rugby?
"Oh, that looks like fun and good PR. We'll have a piece of that."
The man is innocent. So no problem. The PC police can fuck right off.
-
-
@Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Gunner Good luck with that.
NZ Cricket have painted a big red nose on their faces and said "punch me".
They've asked and they will surely receive.
I'm not sure what you are saying. Are you saying they shouldn't have selected him?
I agree there will be a reaction from some sections of the media, but shouldn't they ignore that?
-
@Duluth I think it's complete madness to select him a couple of weeks after his rape re-trial finished.
It will be more than the media reacting and they are running a business - they might as well sack their PR department.
@Hooroo Maybe in a couple of years, when he's slipped out of the immediate public consciousness.
-
@Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Gunner Good luck with that.
NZ Cricket have painted a big red nose on their faces and said "punch me".
They've asked and they will surely receive.
I don't understand the logic of anyone having a problem with an innocent man being selected.
Is he supposed to be punished for being accused of rape? -
@Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Duluth I think it's complete madness to select him a couple of weeks after his rape re-trial finished.
It will be more than the media reacting and they are running a business - they might as well sack their PR department.
@Hooroo Maybe in a couple of years, when he's slipped out of the immediate public consciousness.
by which time his career might well be over or well past his best or had a career ending injury, honestly, I don't think there is any right time, cant let the PC peeps or media dictate how you select your team, there will always be those that will bring it up anyway, I mean remember Roger Randle.
-
@Gunner said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Gunner Good luck with that.
NZ Cricket have painted a big red nose on their faces and said "punch me".
They've asked and they will surely receive.
I don't understand the logic of anyone having a problem with an innocent man being selected.
Is he supposed to be punished for being accused of rape?He's not innocent - he's not guilty - and it took two goes to get that verdict.
But that is irrelevant to my point.
NZ Cricket is running a business and they have just bought themselves a shitstorm of negative publicity. It is, in my view, a completely idiotic decision by the organization.
-
@Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Gunner said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Gunner Good luck with that.
NZ Cricket have painted a big red nose on their faces and said "punch me".
They've asked and they will surely receive.
I don't understand the logic of anyone having a problem with an innocent man being selected.
Is he supposed to be punished for being accused of rape?He's not innocent - he's not guilty - and it took two goes to get that verdict.
But that is irrelevant to my point.
NZ Cricket is running a business and they have just bought themselves a shitstorm of negative publicity. It is, in my view, a completely idiotic decision by the organization.
He is innocent of the charges laid against him. Don't twist what didn't happen.
That is like saying anyone found not guilty is not innocent but not guilty as well.
-
@Chris-B. if not for Ferguson, Boult & Southee being injured, I don't think he'd of been called in, not that what the media are gonna say should have a bearing, as you say they are running a business, they need to win games, he is a cricketer in NZ like all the others, and the best of a bunch that gives them a shot at winning the test, which is the goal of the business
-
@Hooroo said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Gunner said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:
@Gunner Good luck with that.
He is innocent of the charges laid against him. Don't twist what didn't happen.
That is like saying anyone found not guilty is not innocent but not guilty as well.
Actually your second point is correct in a legal sense. Not guilty is not the same as innocent. But, it's the best you can get from the court - roughly, that the case couldn't be proven against you.
-
@Chris-B I take your point, from a PR side of things this could blow up, especially with all the nonsense about a "rape culture" in the media lately, but at the end of the day he got accused of something that could not be proved in court. You can't ruin someone's career because of accusations alone. I'm comfortable with their decision to select him. If he can take a stack of wickets that won't hurt...
-
@No-Quarter Well, at least if the shitstorm arrives, they've got David White to handle it all for them, so nothing's going wrong there.
I wonder - after his experiences in 2016 - whether Steve Tew would have allowed this?
