• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

NZ v SA Test Series

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
606 Posts 48 Posters 72.8k Views
NZ v SA Test Series
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #378

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    That is an extremely foolish selection by NZ Cricket.

    Did they not see the shitstorms that blew up around the Chiefs and Wellington rugby?

    "Oh, that looks like fun and good PR. We'll have a piece of that."

    The man is innocent. So no problem. The PC police can fuck right off.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    8
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #379

    @Gunner Good luck with that.

    NZ Cricket have painted a big red nose on their faces and said "punch me".

    They've asked and they will surely receive.

    DuluthD G 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #380

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Gunner Good luck with that.

    NZ Cricket have painted a big red nose on their faces and said "punch me".

    They've asked and they will surely receive.

    I'm not sure what you are saying. Are you saying they shouldn't have selected him?

    I agree there will be a reaction from some sections of the media, but shouldn't they ignore that?

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    wrote on last edited by
    #381

    @Chris-B Are you saying he should never be selected?

    The guy was not guilty.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Duluth on last edited by
    #382

    @Duluth I think it's complete madness to select him a couple of weeks after his rape re-trial finished.

    It will be more than the media reacting and they are running a business - they might as well sack their PR department.

    @Hooroo Maybe in a couple of years, when he's slipped out of the immediate public consciousness.

    DuluthD taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gunner
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #383

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Gunner Good luck with that.

    NZ Cricket have painted a big red nose on their faces and said "punch me".

    They've asked and they will surely receive.

    I don't understand the logic of anyone having a problem with an innocent man being selected.
    Is he supposed to be punished for being accused of rape?

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    6
  • DuluthD Offline
    DuluthD Offline
    Duluth
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by Duluth
    #384

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Duluth I think it's complete madness to select him a couple of weeks after his rape re-trial finished.

    How long after an unproven allegation before he should be available?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by taniwharugby
    #385

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Duluth I think it's complete madness to select him a couple of weeks after his rape re-trial finished.

    It will be more than the media reacting and they are running a business - they might as well sack their PR department.

    @Hooroo Maybe in a couple of years, when he's slipped out of the immediate public consciousness.

    by which time his career might well be over or well past his best or had a career ending injury, honestly, I don't think there is any right time, cant let the PC peeps or media dictate how you select your team, there will always be those that will bring it up anyway, I mean remember Roger Randle.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Gunner on last edited by
    #386

    @Gunner said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Gunner Good luck with that.

    NZ Cricket have painted a big red nose on their faces and said "punch me".

    They've asked and they will surely receive.

    I don't understand the logic of anyone having a problem with an innocent man being selected.
    Is he supposed to be punished for being accused of rape?

    He's not innocent - he's not guilty - and it took two goes to get that verdict.

    But that is irrelevant to my point.

    NZ Cricket is running a business and they have just bought themselves a shitstorm of negative publicity. It is, in my view, a completely idiotic decision by the organization.

    HoorooH taniwharugbyT rotatedR 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • HoorooH Offline
    HoorooH Offline
    Hooroo
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #387

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Gunner said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Gunner Good luck with that.

    NZ Cricket have painted a big red nose on their faces and said "punch me".

    They've asked and they will surely receive.

    I don't understand the logic of anyone having a problem with an innocent man being selected.
    Is he supposed to be punished for being accused of rape?

    He's not innocent - he's not guilty - and it took two goes to get that verdict.

    But that is irrelevant to my point.

    NZ Cricket is running a business and they have just bought themselves a shitstorm of negative publicity. It is, in my view, a completely idiotic decision by the organization.

    He is innocent of the charges laid against him. Don't twist what didn't happen.

    That is like saying anyone found not guilty is not innocent but not guilty as well.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MN5M Offline
    MN5M Offline
    MN5
    wrote on last edited by
    #388

    Google his old man's test batting average. Beating that should be his first priority.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugbyT Offline
    taniwharugby
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #389

    @Chris-B. if not for Ferguson, Boult & Southee being injured, I don't think he'd of been called in, not that what the media are gonna say should have a bearing, as you say they are running a business, they need to win games, he is a cricketer in NZ like all the others, and the best of a bunch that gives them a shot at winning the test, which is the goal of the business

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BovidaeB Offline
    BovidaeB Offline
    Bovidae
    wrote on last edited by
    #390

    The only other bowler who might have been chosen is Milne, but he is coming back from injury (again).

    Kuggeleijn has played for NZ A before and is up there with the best bowlers in the Plunket Shield (wickets and average) this season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to Hooroo on last edited by
    #391

    @Hooroo said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Gunner said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Gunner Good luck with that.

    He is innocent of the charges laid against him. Don't twist what didn't happen.

    That is like saying anyone found not guilty is not innocent but not guilty as well.

    Actually your second point is correct in a legal sense. Not guilty is not the same as innocent. But, it's the best you can get from the court - roughly, that the case couldn't be proven against you.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • No QuarterN Offline
    No QuarterN Offline
    No Quarter
    wrote on last edited by
    #392

    @Chris-B I take your point, from a PR side of things this could blow up, especially with all the nonsense about a "rape culture" in the media lately, but at the end of the day he got accused of something that could not be proved in court. You can't ruin someone's career because of accusations alone. I'm comfortable with their decision to select him. If he can take a stack of wickets that won't hurt... 🙂

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to No Quarter on last edited by
    #393

    @No-Quarter Well, at least if the shitstorm arrives, they've got David White to handle it all for them, so nothing's going wrong there. 🙂

    I wonder - after his experiences in 2016 - whether Steve Tew would have allowed this?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    hydro11
    wrote on last edited by
    #394

    Appeasing the PC police never ends well. The people who aren't happy with Kuggeleijn being picked now, won't be happy in a year's time either. Chris you seem to be arguing that the people who don't want Kuggeleijn to be selected because of the rape trial are being irrational but we should listen to them anyway.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to hydro11 on last edited by
    #395

    @hydro11 I don't think I've expressed a view on their rationality one way or the other.

    H 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • rotatedR Offline
    rotatedR Offline
    rotated
    replied to Chris B. on last edited by
    #396

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    He's not innocent - he's not guilty - and it took two goes to get that verdict.

    By the same token he was tried twice and both times they failed to get a guilty verdict.

    Absolutely buy that a media shitstorm is going to ensue, but at the end of the day the national team should be selected on merit - it is a representative side. Being cleared on all charges this should be available for selection.

    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.C Offline
    Chris B.
    replied to rotated on last edited by
    #397

    @rotated said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    @Chris-B. said in NZ v SA Test Series:

    He's not innocent - he's not guilty - and it took two goes to get that verdict.

    Being cleared on all charges this should be available for selection.

    So if Cairnsie was still in his hey-day, would you be happy if he was picked?

    HoorooH taniwharugbyT rotatedR 3 Replies Last reply
    5

NZ v SA Test Series
Sports Talk
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.